Pack93z
  • Pack93z
  • Select Member Topic Starter
14 years ago
Leave it to someone from California, needing a cause for her voice and garner some attention, to kick off such a campaign.

Novel idea.. tell your children.. NO.


Consumer Group Sues McDonald's Over Happy Meal Toys
 

Dear Child In The Back Seat: Your days of whining for the Strawberry Shortcake Happy Meal toy you saw on TV may be numbered. At least in California.

The Center for Science in the Public Interest filed a lawsuit today against McDonald's in state court in California to stop the company from advertising toys with Happy Meals.

It's no sure thing that the consumer group will get its way in court, of course, but the lawsuit ups the pressure on the fast-food chain over the combination of food and toys that appeal to kids. McDonald's defends the meals.


The group filed the class action suit on behalf of parents, including plaintiff Monet Parham, a 41-year-old mother of two from Sacramento who says she's fed up with the pestering.

"Happy meals are among the those things frequently requested, and the first thing they ask me to do is open the toy," Parham said in a press conference today. "I'm really concerned about the health of my children, and I don't think its OK to entice children to get Happy Meals with a toy," she added.

McDonald's didn't immediately return requests for comment about the lawsuit, although it has known that CSPI intended to file a suit since June.

The lawsuit asserts that under California's consumer protection laws, McDonald's toy advertising is deceptive. It targets children under 8 years old who don't have the ability to understand advertising.

"Little kids don't know the difference between a program and a commercial," says CSPI's Executive Director Michael Jacobson. The Institute of Medicine and the Supreme Court have said as much.

But the real concern for the group, and for parents, CSPI says, is that McDonald's advertising makes kids beg their parents to buy food that's high in calories, sugar, fat and salt, which contributes to obesity.

"Marketing to kids is an end-run around parental control," says Stephen Gardner, CSPI's director of litigation.

But CSPI is not asking for damages, just for McDonald's to stop advertising toys.

"This is about the change, not the money," Gardner says.

For its part, McDonald's has added healthier items to its menu in recent years, like apple slices, low-fat milk. But french fries still go into Happy Meals more than 90 percent of the time, Jacobson notes.

McDonald's and other fast food companies spend over half a billion dollars a year on advertising and marketing kids meals most of it on toys.

Separately, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors overrode a mayoral veto last month to push ahead with an ordinance that would effectively ban toys from most Happy Meals starting in December 2011.

UPDATE: 12:48pm. McDonald's spokesperson Bridget Coffing issued the following statement. It addresses neither toys nor advertising:

We are proud of our Happy Meals and intend to vigorously defend our brand, our reputation and our food.

We stand on our 30 year track record of providing a fun experience for kids and families at McDonalds.

We listen to our customers, and parents consistently tell us they approve of our Happy Meals. We are confident that parents understand and appreciate that Happy Meals are a fun treat, with quality, right-sized food choices for their children that can fit into a balanced diet
.


"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
4PackGirl
14 years ago
utter stupidity.
last time i checked, no kid can drive him/herself to mickey d's & buy a happy meal on their own. DUH!!
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
McDonalds should countersue the parents for defamation and maybe for abusive parenting practices too.
UserPostedImage
IronMan
14 years ago
What a dumb bitch.
Formo
14 years ago
Holy shit.

Hate to say it, but it's crap like this that makes me wish that the whole damn state would break off and sink into the Pacific. Sorry ZS, time to get the fuck outta dodge.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
RaiderPride
14 years ago
I am not even going to start on this.
""People Will Probably Never Remember What You Said, And May Never Remember What You Did. However, People Will Always Remember How You Made Them Feel."
Dulak
14 years ago
I can see both sides of the coin with this -
#1 to allow freedoms
and
#2 to not allow certain things because opportunity could lead to a certain behavior

case in point -
1. I never liked the lack of gun control in the states; and since living in england for the past 4 years I can see it even more so clearly. Opportunity could lead to problems.

Example; was a school shooting recently in the states and many people think about what the parents or teachers or peer groups could of done. But IMO the most obvious question is; what about gun control ... if the opportunity wasnt there for that child to get a gun and bring it to school then there would be no shooting.

2. Lets look at it on the opposite side of the coin. I used to think that the states had a big drinking culture and wisconsin being one of the biggest ... I WAS WRONG. I came to england ... I often see kids 18 and younger often 16 or even younger drinking on public transport or on street corners. Adults hanging in pubs much more here then in the states ...
IMO instead of trying to instill values and hoping people listen and make sense; IMO there needs to be better control. Higher drinking age and actual cops that dont allow antisocial drinking to occure ...

my point is that I think some rules and laws are good; I dont think we should be left to our own devices about anything that goes ...
yaya the freedom thing ... but seriously ... if someday your kid got shot with a gun in school - I know I would wonder if that would of happened if there were better gun laws and they werent just everywhere ...
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
You're right. If someday my kid gets run over by a car, I'm going to wonder why there isn't more car control. If someday he chokes on a piece of candy, I'm going to wonder why there isn't more candy control. If someday he falls off a slide and gets hurt, I'm going to wonder why there isn't more slide control. (Come to think of it, the problem these days is too much slide control. When I was a kid, we had slippery metal slides and we went down so fast that we flew off the ends. It was awesome. Nowadays, I watch kids literally pulling themselves down slides because the coefficient of friction on the plastic slides is so absurdly high. They're taking all the fun out of something as fundamental to childhood as a slide. But I digress.)

Seriously, Dulak, you can't prevent everything. With freedom comes an element of danger. That's the way it's supposed to be. That's what makes life fun. That's what makes life worth living. I'd far rather have the danger that comes with being able to control my own life than the illusion of safety that comes with the government telling me what to do. It's not like more laws really prevent problems anyway; they just drive the problems underground.

For example, the age of consent in Germany is 14, and in Germany, about 40% of babies are born out of wedlock. In America, the age of consent ranges from 16 to 18. Guess how many babies are born out of wedlock here? You're right -- about 40%. But at least in Germany, the teens mothers and their boyfriends aren't worried about going to jail for doing what humans do. The increase in out-of-wedlock births in this country is much more a function of young people being encouraged to delay marriage than it is teens having more sex than they used to. But I digress again.

Who gives a shit if teens are drinking anyway? Let them drink. It's not like they have anything else to do in our society that is so contemptuous of young people. Is fining and throwing them in jail for having fun really a better alternative? I'll bet you any amount of money the rate of teen death due to drunk driving is far lower in England than it is in the United States. I saw teens drinking all over the place in Germany, yet I never saw any of the public intoxication problems (fighting, binge drinking, etc.) that I see all the time in my home town, where the police patrol constantly and harass students at every opportunity.

The problems you decry are much more a symptom of a sick culture than they are of availability. If someone wants to get their hands on alcohol, they'll always manage to do so, no matter how tight enforcement may be. Similarly, if someone wants to commit a murder badly enough, they can always find a gun, no matter how strict the laws are. Or they can just use a candle stick.
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
14 years ago
Non got a +1.
I always said, we should take away ALL cars, cause some idiots abuse their rights and drive drunk. Makes as much sense as outlawing guns, because some idiots abuse them.
Fact is, when guns are outlawed in any place, the only people that have guns are the ones you should be most worried about. The criminals. They don't obey ANY laws, including "gun control" laws.
I bet alot more kids are killed because they got drunk or high then are killed by guns in schools. But school shootings get all the "headlines".
Guess we should take all booze and beer out of homes too, cause some teen might get ahold of it.
Now....with the thread, parents need to say NO and mean it. If the kid KNOWS he/she will get their way if they just whine long enough, who's fault is that? Bad parenting is the problem.
A swat on the ass is what those kids need. "OH!!! I CAN'T BELIEVE YOU SAID THAT!!! SPANK A KID?!?! YOU NEANDERTHAL!!!"
I'll tell you what....it worked on me when i was a kid. And i was NOT abused. Fact is, i deserved more spankings then i got. But the fear of consequences for my actions more often then not kept me in line. Not a bad thing, if you ask me.
UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
14 years ago

Holy shit.

Hate to say it, but it's crap like this that makes me wish that the whole damn state would break off and sink into the Pacific. Sorry ZS, time to get the fuck outta dodge.

"Formo" wrote:



California is the most beautiful place on earth. I can't help it that half the people here are fucking idiots. I've been to New Zealand and that's a close 2nd. Europe and Asia are too overpopulated to even be considered in the running.

I don't run away from fights. I'll fight to the very end. I'm learning that there are a lot of angry folks here who think like I do.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Fan Shout
beast (1h) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately
Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.
dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.
Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Guessing they probably knew. Did he have cast or something on?
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : Did they know that at the time or was that something the realized afterwards?
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Van Ness played most of season with broken thumb
wpr (9-Apr) : yay
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy says Steelers likely to protect Packers game. Meaning, no Ireland
Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Struggling to figure out what text editor options are needed and which are 'nice to have'
Mucky Tundra (8-Apr) : *CHOMP CHOMP CHOMP*
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : WR who said he'd break Xavier Worthy 40 time...and ran slower than you
Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Who?
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Texas’ WR Isaiah Bond is scheduled to visit the Bills, Browns, Chiefs, Falcons, Packers and Titans starting next week.
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Spotting ball isn't changing, only measuring distance is, Which wasn't the issue.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
21h / Random Babble / wpr

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

15-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

29-Mar / Random Babble / wpr

28-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

26-Mar / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.