Pack93z
  • Pack93z
  • Select Member Topic Starter
14 years ago
Leave it to someone from California, needing a cause for her voice and garner some attention, to kick off such a campaign.

Novel idea.. tell your children.. NO.


Consumer Group Sues McDonald's Over Happy Meal Toys
 

Dear Child In The Back Seat: Your days of whining for the Strawberry Shortcake Happy Meal toy you saw on TV may be numbered. At least in California.

The Center for Science in the Public Interest filed a lawsuit today against McDonald's in state court in California to stop the company from advertising toys with Happy Meals.

It's no sure thing that the consumer group will get its way in court, of course, but the lawsuit ups the pressure on the fast-food chain over the combination of food and toys that appeal to kids. McDonald's defends the meals.


The group filed the class action suit on behalf of parents, including plaintiff Monet Parham, a 41-year-old mother of two from Sacramento who says she's fed up with the pestering.

"Happy meals are among the those things frequently requested, and the first thing they ask me to do is open the toy," Parham said in a press conference today. "I'm really concerned about the health of my children, and I don't think its OK to entice children to get Happy Meals with a toy," she added.

McDonald's didn't immediately return requests for comment about the lawsuit, although it has known that CSPI intended to file a suit since June.

The lawsuit asserts that under California's consumer protection laws, McDonald's toy advertising is deceptive. It targets children under 8 years old who don't have the ability to understand advertising.

"Little kids don't know the difference between a program and a commercial," says CSPI's Executive Director Michael Jacobson. The Institute of Medicine and the Supreme Court have said as much.

But the real concern for the group, and for parents, CSPI says, is that McDonald's advertising makes kids beg their parents to buy food that's high in calories, sugar, fat and salt, which contributes to obesity.

"Marketing to kids is an end-run around parental control," says Stephen Gardner, CSPI's director of litigation.

But CSPI is not asking for damages, just for McDonald's to stop advertising toys.

"This is about the change, not the money," Gardner says.

For its part, McDonald's has added healthier items to its menu in recent years, like apple slices, low-fat milk. But french fries still go into Happy Meals more than 90 percent of the time, Jacobson notes.

McDonald's and other fast food companies spend over half a billion dollars a year on advertising and marketing kids meals most of it on toys.

Separately, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors overrode a mayoral veto last month to push ahead with an ordinance that would effectively ban toys from most Happy Meals starting in December 2011.

UPDATE: 12:48pm. McDonald's spokesperson Bridget Coffing issued the following statement. It addresses neither toys nor advertising:

We are proud of our Happy Meals and intend to vigorously defend our brand, our reputation and our food.

We stand on our 30 year track record of providing a fun experience for kids and families at McDonalds.

We listen to our customers, and parents consistently tell us they approve of our Happy Meals. We are confident that parents understand and appreciate that Happy Meals are a fun treat, with quality, right-sized food choices for their children that can fit into a balanced diet
.


"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
4PackGirl
14 years ago
utter stupidity.
last time i checked, no kid can drive him/herself to mickey d's & buy a happy meal on their own. DUH!!
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
McDonalds should countersue the parents for defamation and maybe for abusive parenting practices too.
UserPostedImage
IronMan
14 years ago
What a dumb bitch.
Formo
14 years ago
Holy shit.

Hate to say it, but it's crap like this that makes me wish that the whole damn state would break off and sink into the Pacific. Sorry ZS, time to get the fuck outta dodge.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
RaiderPride
14 years ago
I am not even going to start on this.
""People Will Probably Never Remember What You Said, And May Never Remember What You Did. However, People Will Always Remember How You Made Them Feel."
Dulak
14 years ago
I can see both sides of the coin with this -
#1 to allow freedoms
and
#2 to not allow certain things because opportunity could lead to a certain behavior

case in point -
1. I never liked the lack of gun control in the states; and since living in england for the past 4 years I can see it even more so clearly. Opportunity could lead to problems.

Example; was a school shooting recently in the states and many people think about what the parents or teachers or peer groups could of done. But IMO the most obvious question is; what about gun control ... if the opportunity wasnt there for that child to get a gun and bring it to school then there would be no shooting.

2. Lets look at it on the opposite side of the coin. I used to think that the states had a big drinking culture and wisconsin being one of the biggest ... I WAS WRONG. I came to england ... I often see kids 18 and younger often 16 or even younger drinking on public transport or on street corners. Adults hanging in pubs much more here then in the states ...
IMO instead of trying to instill values and hoping people listen and make sense; IMO there needs to be better control. Higher drinking age and actual cops that dont allow antisocial drinking to occure ...

my point is that I think some rules and laws are good; I dont think we should be left to our own devices about anything that goes ...
yaya the freedom thing ... but seriously ... if someday your kid got shot with a gun in school - I know I would wonder if that would of happened if there were better gun laws and they werent just everywhere ...
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
You're right. If someday my kid gets run over by a car, I'm going to wonder why there isn't more car control. If someday he chokes on a piece of candy, I'm going to wonder why there isn't more candy control. If someday he falls off a slide and gets hurt, I'm going to wonder why there isn't more slide control. (Come to think of it, the problem these days is too much slide control. When I was a kid, we had slippery metal slides and we went down so fast that we flew off the ends. It was awesome. Nowadays, I watch kids literally pulling themselves down slides because the coefficient of friction on the plastic slides is so absurdly high. They're taking all the fun out of something as fundamental to childhood as a slide. But I digress.)

Seriously, Dulak, you can't prevent everything. With freedom comes an element of danger. That's the way it's supposed to be. That's what makes life fun. That's what makes life worth living. I'd far rather have the danger that comes with being able to control my own life than the illusion of safety that comes with the government telling me what to do. It's not like more laws really prevent problems anyway; they just drive the problems underground.

For example, the age of consent in Germany is 14, and in Germany, about 40% of babies are born out of wedlock. In America, the age of consent ranges from 16 to 18. Guess how many babies are born out of wedlock here? You're right -- about 40%. But at least in Germany, the teens mothers and their boyfriends aren't worried about going to jail for doing what humans do. The increase in out-of-wedlock births in this country is much more a function of young people being encouraged to delay marriage than it is teens having more sex than they used to. But I digress again.

Who gives a shit if teens are drinking anyway? Let them drink. It's not like they have anything else to do in our society that is so contemptuous of young people. Is fining and throwing them in jail for having fun really a better alternative? I'll bet you any amount of money the rate of teen death due to drunk driving is far lower in England than it is in the United States. I saw teens drinking all over the place in Germany, yet I never saw any of the public intoxication problems (fighting, binge drinking, etc.) that I see all the time in my home town, where the police patrol constantly and harass students at every opportunity.

The problems you decry are much more a symptom of a sick culture than they are of availability. If someone wants to get their hands on alcohol, they'll always manage to do so, no matter how tight enforcement may be. Similarly, if someone wants to commit a murder badly enough, they can always find a gun, no matter how strict the laws are. Or they can just use a candle stick.
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
14 years ago
Non got a +1.
I always said, we should take away ALL cars, cause some idiots abuse their rights and drive drunk. Makes as much sense as outlawing guns, because some idiots abuse them.
Fact is, when guns are outlawed in any place, the only people that have guns are the ones you should be most worried about. The criminals. They don't obey ANY laws, including "gun control" laws.
I bet alot more kids are killed because they got drunk or high then are killed by guns in schools. But school shootings get all the "headlines".
Guess we should take all booze and beer out of homes too, cause some teen might get ahold of it.
Now....with the thread, parents need to say NO and mean it. If the kid KNOWS he/she will get their way if they just whine long enough, who's fault is that? Bad parenting is the problem.
A swat on the ass is what those kids need. "OH!!! I CAN'T BELIEVE YOU SAID THAT!!! SPANK A KID?!?! YOU NEANDERTHAL!!!"
I'll tell you what....it worked on me when i was a kid. And i was NOT abused. Fact is, i deserved more spankings then i got. But the fear of consequences for my actions more often then not kept me in line. Not a bad thing, if you ask me.
UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
14 years ago

Holy shit.

Hate to say it, but it's crap like this that makes me wish that the whole damn state would break off and sink into the Pacific. Sorry ZS, time to get the fuck outta dodge.

"Formo" wrote:



California is the most beautiful place on earth. I can't help it that half the people here are fucking idiots. I've been to New Zealand and that's a close 2nd. Europe and Asia are too overpopulated to even be considered in the running.

I don't run away from fights. I'll fight to the very end. I'm learning that there are a lot of angry folks here who think like I do.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Fan Shout
beast (40m) : Not nessarily, he might of been injured either way. He's playing about 50% of the games the last 4 years
Zero2Cool (7h) : If they'd been more patient with him, he'd be back already. Putting him out there vs Bears caused him to tweak it and here we are.
packerfanoutwest (7h) : well this is his last season with the PAck, book it
beast (8h) : Sounds like no Alexander (again), I'm wondering if his time with the Packers is done
Zero2Cool (15h) : Could ban beast and I still don't think anyone catches him.
Mucky Tundra (26-Dec) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore
packerfanoutwest (25-Dec) : Feliz Navidad!
Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!
beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

25-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Dec / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.