zombieslayer
14 years ago
Well, I didn't watch the game but nobody answered my question. I think I've asked this it on several threads. What happened to Kuhn? How come we didn't put him in there on those 4th and 1s? Was he suited up?

I'm not for all pass. I think it depends on the circumstance. Atlanta's weakness is defending the pass so that's why I'm adamant about passing against them. The Giants however are #1 in the NFL at defending the pass so we better be able to run against them.

Now, someone please answer my question - what happened to Kuhn?
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Finley88Beast
14 years ago

Well, I didn't watch the game but nobody answered my question. I think I've asked this it on several threads. What happened to Kuhn? How come we didn't put him in there on those 4th and 1s? Was he suited up?

I'm not for all pass. I think it depends on the circumstance. Atlanta's weakness is defending the pass so that's why I'm adamant about passing against them. The Giants however are #1 in the NFL at defending the pass so we better be able to run against them.

Now, someone please answer my question - what happened to Kuhn?

"zombieslayer" wrote:



Idk thats a good question I didn't really see that much of him these past 2 games at all..

Maybe he"ll go back to his fb roll or something,honestly don't have an answer to where he has been.

For the most part ill answer your question,I think he hasn't played much because of how Mike McCarthy Gameplaned for the last 2 games with not to much I-formations.V.S the falcons idk if he even carried the ball once he just played as the 3rd down back in shotgun sometimes..

Could be like the A.J hawk situation in week 1 sorta thing but who knows.
A Quote from my brother Mike(Bears Fan)
"Fucking Greg Jennings"
After he makes a catch
Dulak
14 years ago

Well, I didn't watch the game but nobody answered my question. I think I've asked this it on several threads. What happened to Kuhn? How come we didn't put him in there on those 4th and 1s? Was he suited up?

I'm not for all pass. I think it depends on the circumstance. Atlanta's weakness is defending the pass so that's why I'm adamant about passing against them. The Giants however are #1 in the NFL at defending the pass so we better be able to run against them.

Now, someone please answer my question - what happened to Kuhn?

"zombieslayer" wrote:



I asked this same question multiple times in the chat and after - wtf was kuhn; I remember him only getting 1 play that game and I think it was a pass.

Here we were at the endzone 3rd and 1 and we give it to rodgers to sneak 2x against the falcons stiff run D.

2 things stood out for me with the packers and short yardage plays. We often were successful with short passes to kuhn (remember last year hom many times we saw kuhn in the endzone holding the ball ...)
and #2 with big quinn as our lead blocker and big kuhn as our RB ... those 2 could often get the job done.

We didnt even use him on our other 4th and 1 that rodgers called us to do.

and btw - where's the freaking screens? ... ok so we cant run vs the falcons; how about some short yardage screens? with some lead blockers ... just cuz taucher is out doesnt mean we cant screen.

anyways - seems like we were trying to do some things that were different and yet didnt work when we could of done some things that would of probably worked.

But this topic is about 5 wr sets ... and ya do what works ...
Cheesey
  • Cheesey
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
14 years ago
Had he gone to the 5, that opens up a running lane for Rodgers, which would keep the defense "honest".
And the runs were NOT WORKING. That's my point. Should we do it every game? No....i never said that. But in THIS game running got us NOTHING. Unless it was Rodgers taking off.
Am i wrong about that?
UserPostedImage
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
14 years ago
Zombieslayer and others have convinced me on the "balance" question. And while I still hanker for the return of running game "dominance", I realize that the game has changed.

But I'm still with Shawn and macbob.

Because a team still needs to be able to do some things running-wise. There must be some situations that the opposing team must be considering "run play" as a credible option.

1. Play action only works to the extent that people believe you might be calling a running play.
2. When it's first and goal inside the ten, the opposing team has to consider run plays as real possibilities. And not just quarterback sneaks and trick run plays like quarterback draws.
3. A team must be able to get a first down with regularity by running the ball when it's third and short, or fourth and one.

IMO #3 is not the case with this team, and #2 is questionable. And, partly because of #3 and #2, #1 is not as powerful as it should be.

We have been spoiled because Rodgers is so good at covering up the weaknesses of the line. But unless they are solved, problems in #1-#3 are going to make his job more and more difficult. Maybe not against SF or Detroit. But if the team gets to the playoffs?
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Cheesey
  • Cheesey
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
14 years ago
Yes....for the most part, you need "balance".
But how many times in one particular game do you need to slam your head into a wall before you decide, "Hey....maybe this isn't working".?

We need a running game. That's a given. But in that game, it wasn't working even a little bit. Every run was a waste of a down.
Play to your strengths until the opposition proves they can stop you.

Doesn't that make sense?

And as far as i can see, our running game is just not working this year. So should you be stubborn, just to say "Look! We ran the ball!" so that people don't say your one dimensional?
Do what works for that game. If you CAN run, GREAT!
If you can't, do something else.
Or in the end, you will end up on the wrong end of the won-lost column.
You know.....just like we did.
UserPostedImage
warhawk
14 years ago
Our passing game was affective to a degree because McCarthy did call on the run and Rodgers was able to play behind the center often enough to require the defense to defend the run.

I think the offense and Rodgers does very well with him under center and faking a handoff. Regardless of whether or not the run is working the defense has to respect it which allows the play action to work. This is about holding the LB's and making the DL maintain their gaps vs. allowing the LB's to cheat on the pass and allowing the linemen to all out push the pocket.

Now the best of both worlds is we get something positive out of the run game as well. This was a week where that didn't happen but while rushing the ball has not been prolific it usually accomplishes the mission of getting some positive yards and keeping the D honest. Afterall, we average about 100 yds a game.

I have resolved myself to the fact we, like most prolific passing teams, will not kick butt in the run game when we play stout four man fronts but it's going to be harder for Rodgers if we don't line up with him under center and either hand it off or go with a play action pass.

Almost everytime I see Rodgers under center and he pulls the ball back and throws it the protection is solid and something good happens. This only works because the defense must remain disciplined and true to their assigments. Otherwise they would ignore the possibility of the run altogether and just pour in on Rodgers regardless of how we are lined up.
"The train is leaving the station."
zombieslayer
14 years ago

Yes....for the most part, you need "balance".
But how many times in one particular game do you need to slam your head into a wall before you decide, "Hey....maybe this isn't working".?

We need a running game. That's a given. But in that game, it wasn't working even a little bit. Every run was a waste of a down.
Play to your strengths until the opposition proves they can stop you.

Doesn't that make sense?

And as far as i can see, our running game is just not working this year. So should you be stubborn, just to say "Look! We ran the ball!" so that people don't say your one dimensional?
Do what works for that game. If you CAN run, GREAT!
If you can't, do something else.
Or in the end, you will end up on the wrong end of the won-lost column.
You know.....just like we did.

"Cheesey" wrote:



Yes, it totally makes sense. When talking about this game and this game only, it completely makes sense.

I try to emphasise that we're talking about this game and this game only but people will still bring up other games.

OK, this game, and this game only (for the 3rd time now) - the run was a complete waste of a down. I showed in the play by play on two threads now that running wasted a down and passing worked. We had essentially 3 TD drives including the fumble in the end zone. They were pretty much all passes. When we ran, we had to punt.

Note that I'm talking about this game and this game only.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
PackerTraxx
14 years ago
In the big picture we are toast without a running game. Unless your goal is to simply get into the playoffs. JMHO
Why is Jerry Kramer not in the Hall of Fame?
zombieslayer
14 years ago
Wow. I said it 4 times. Maybe I have to say it 5 times.

This thread is about the game VERSUS THE ATLANTA FALCONS ONLY.
This thread is about the game VERSUS THE ATLANTA FALCONS ONLY.
This thread is about the game VERSUS THE ATLANTA FALCONS ONLY.
This thread is about the game VERSUS THE ATLANTA FALCONS ONLY.
This thread is about the game VERSUS THE ATLANTA FALCONS ONLY.

OK. Now that we're clear (hopefully) that we're talking about the Atlanta Falcons game, please continue.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (13h) : @AaronNagler · 2m Both Jordan Love and Malik Willis were Limited participants at Packers practice today.
Zero2Cool (15h) : Johnson didn't make it until 2020. Ring 2023. 🤷 Personally, he should have been in years prior to Hall.
Zero2Cool (15h) : HUMP DAY
beast (16h) : Guys that have a good shot at making the NFL Hall of Fame usually get into their teams pretty fast
beast (16h) : Yeah, but is Kampman and the others in the NFL Hall of Fame?
Zero2Cool (16h) : Johnson was Hall of Fame, 2020. Should haev been in Ring a year later, not three years.
Zero2Cool (16h) : I could be wrong there though
Zero2Cool (16h) : Guys like Kampman, Tim Harris, Al Harris, etc all over 15 years. Hall of Fame is 5 year wait
Zero2Cool (16h) : I guess I see players in Packers Hall come way later
beast (16h) : Yeah, usually teams hall of fames are a much lower bar than the NFL
Zero2Cool (16h) : is it uncommon for Hall before Ring?
Zero2Cool (16h) : S Xavier McKinney named first-team All-Pro by NFLPA
beast (18h) : I missed it, sorry, but he got into the NFL Hall of Fame years before that
Zero2Cool (18h) : Jones took his sweet ole time!
Zero2Cool (18h) : Yeah, he's in the ring of honor, just saw video and his name is up there
Zero2Cool (18h) : Didn't they have a thing in 2023 for Jimmy's ring of honor? I swear I saw it
beast (18h) : Though if they're legitimately trying to re-sign MM, then it makes sense.
beast (18h) : Jerry Jones still hasn't put Jimmy Johnson in the Ring of Honor, but he's in the NFL's Hall of Fame, Jones is petty
Mucky Tundra (8-Jan) : Unless the Cowboys are planning an extension, seems kinda petty
beast (8-Jan) : Cowboys denied Bears request
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : From what I'm reading, MM is under contract through the 14th of January; after that he's free game
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : McCarthy let go or not extended??
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Chicago Bears have asked the Dallas Cowboys permission to interview Mike McCarthy for head coaching vacancy
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : The winners page that is
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : I was not hoping for that. It messes up the page lol
beast (6-Jan) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3.
beast (6-Jan) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3.
beast (6-Jan) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : congrats beast on 2024 !
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : congrats porky on winning 2023 pick'em! (oops sorry)
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : Packers have $60M+ of 2025 cap space on paper TODAY.
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Missed FG into a Lions TD; that'll do pig, that'll do
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : That might be it for the Vikings
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Oh so the refs do know what intentional grounding is
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : what the hell was that Goff?! Not much pressure and he just air mails it to Harrison
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : They really need to to get rid of the auto first down for illegal contact
Martha Careful (6-Jan) : watching the Vikings and Lions it's understandable why they swept the Packers. So much better product
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Even when GB got pressure he was throwing darts; vs no pressure on that last pass he just air mails an open guy
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : didn't have guys in his face ... pressure makes difference
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Where was this Darnold vs GB?
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : BALL DON'T LIE
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : how was that not a safety? Goff throws it at an offensive lineman
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Zero, I thought that was a given! ;)
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Zero I looked through earlier and noticed the same thing. Bonkers year. I just wonder if beast put any money on games
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : I'm hoping for BLOODBATH. Pummel one another.
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : 8 people in pick'em would have won any year with their total lol
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : I'm rooting for the Lions to lose.
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : God help me but I'm rooting for the Vikings to...Vikings to...Christ I can't say it
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : 4 td for Rodgers
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : Chiefs got shutout
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

8-Jan / Around The NFL / beast

7-Jan / Fantasy Sports Talk / wpr

7-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

7-Jan / Fantasy Sports Talk / Zero2Cool

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

6-Jan / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

5-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

3-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.