zombieslayer
14 years ago
Well, I didn't watch the game but nobody answered my question. I think I've asked this it on several threads. What happened to Kuhn? How come we didn't put him in there on those 4th and 1s? Was he suited up?

I'm not for all pass. I think it depends on the circumstance. Atlanta's weakness is defending the pass so that's why I'm adamant about passing against them. The Giants however are #1 in the NFL at defending the pass so we better be able to run against them.

Now, someone please answer my question - what happened to Kuhn?
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Finley88Beast
14 years ago

Well, I didn't watch the game but nobody answered my question. I think I've asked this it on several threads. What happened to Kuhn? How come we didn't put him in there on those 4th and 1s? Was he suited up?

I'm not for all pass. I think it depends on the circumstance. Atlanta's weakness is defending the pass so that's why I'm adamant about passing against them. The Giants however are #1 in the NFL at defending the pass so we better be able to run against them.

Now, someone please answer my question - what happened to Kuhn?

"zombieslayer" wrote:



Idk thats a good question I didn't really see that much of him these past 2 games at all..

Maybe he"ll go back to his fb roll or something,honestly don't have an answer to where he has been.

For the most part ill answer your question,I think he hasn't played much because of how Mike McCarthy Gameplaned for the last 2 games with not to much I-formations.V.S the falcons idk if he even carried the ball once he just played as the 3rd down back in shotgun sometimes..

Could be like the A.J hawk situation in week 1 sorta thing but who knows.
A Quote from my brother Mike(Bears Fan)
"Fucking Greg Jennings"
After he makes a catch
Dulak
14 years ago

Well, I didn't watch the game but nobody answered my question. I think I've asked this it on several threads. What happened to Kuhn? How come we didn't put him in there on those 4th and 1s? Was he suited up?

I'm not for all pass. I think it depends on the circumstance. Atlanta's weakness is defending the pass so that's why I'm adamant about passing against them. The Giants however are #1 in the NFL at defending the pass so we better be able to run against them.

Now, someone please answer my question - what happened to Kuhn?

"zombieslayer" wrote:



I asked this same question multiple times in the chat and after - wtf was kuhn; I remember him only getting 1 play that game and I think it was a pass.

Here we were at the endzone 3rd and 1 and we give it to rodgers to sneak 2x against the falcons stiff run D.

2 things stood out for me with the packers and short yardage plays. We often were successful with short passes to kuhn (remember last year hom many times we saw kuhn in the endzone holding the ball ...)
and #2 with big quinn as our lead blocker and big kuhn as our RB ... those 2 could often get the job done.

We didnt even use him on our other 4th and 1 that rodgers called us to do.

and btw - where's the freaking screens? ... ok so we cant run vs the falcons; how about some short yardage screens? with some lead blockers ... just cuz taucher is out doesnt mean we cant screen.

anyways - seems like we were trying to do some things that were different and yet didnt work when we could of done some things that would of probably worked.

But this topic is about 5 wr sets ... and ya do what works ...
Cheesey
  • Cheesey
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
14 years ago
Had he gone to the 5, that opens up a running lane for Rodgers, which would keep the defense "honest".
And the runs were NOT WORKING. That's my point. Should we do it every game? No....i never said that. But in THIS game running got us NOTHING. Unless it was Rodgers taking off.
Am i wrong about that?
UserPostedImage
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
14 years ago
Zombieslayer and others have convinced me on the "balance" question. And while I still hanker for the return of running game "dominance", I realize that the game has changed.

But I'm still with Shawn and macbob.

Because a team still needs to be able to do some things running-wise. There must be some situations that the opposing team must be considering "run play" as a credible option.

1. Play action only works to the extent that people believe you might be calling a running play.
2. When it's first and goal inside the ten, the opposing team has to consider run plays as real possibilities. And not just quarterback sneaks and trick run plays like quarterback draws.
3. A team must be able to get a first down with regularity by running the ball when it's third and short, or fourth and one.

IMO #3 is not the case with this team, and #2 is questionable. And, partly because of #3 and #2, #1 is not as powerful as it should be.

We have been spoiled because Rodgers is so good at covering up the weaknesses of the line. But unless they are solved, problems in #1-#3 are going to make his job more and more difficult. Maybe not against SF or Detroit. But if the team gets to the playoffs?
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Cheesey
  • Cheesey
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
14 years ago
Yes....for the most part, you need "balance".
But how many times in one particular game do you need to slam your head into a wall before you decide, "Hey....maybe this isn't working".?

We need a running game. That's a given. But in that game, it wasn't working even a little bit. Every run was a waste of a down.
Play to your strengths until the opposition proves they can stop you.

Doesn't that make sense?

And as far as i can see, our running game is just not working this year. So should you be stubborn, just to say "Look! We ran the ball!" so that people don't say your one dimensional?
Do what works for that game. If you CAN run, GREAT!
If you can't, do something else.
Or in the end, you will end up on the wrong end of the won-lost column.
You know.....just like we did.
UserPostedImage
warhawk
14 years ago
Our passing game was affective to a degree because McCarthy did call on the run and Rodgers was able to play behind the center often enough to require the defense to defend the run.

I think the offense and Rodgers does very well with him under center and faking a handoff. Regardless of whether or not the run is working the defense has to respect it which allows the play action to work. This is about holding the LB's and making the DL maintain their gaps vs. allowing the LB's to cheat on the pass and allowing the linemen to all out push the pocket.

Now the best of both worlds is we get something positive out of the run game as well. This was a week where that didn't happen but while rushing the ball has not been prolific it usually accomplishes the mission of getting some positive yards and keeping the D honest. Afterall, we average about 100 yds a game.

I have resolved myself to the fact we, like most prolific passing teams, will not kick butt in the run game when we play stout four man fronts but it's going to be harder for Rodgers if we don't line up with him under center and either hand it off or go with a play action pass.

Almost everytime I see Rodgers under center and he pulls the ball back and throws it the protection is solid and something good happens. This only works because the defense must remain disciplined and true to their assigments. Otherwise they would ignore the possibility of the run altogether and just pour in on Rodgers regardless of how we are lined up.
"The train is leaving the station."
zombieslayer
14 years ago

Yes....for the most part, you need "balance".
But how many times in one particular game do you need to slam your head into a wall before you decide, "Hey....maybe this isn't working".?

We need a running game. That's a given. But in that game, it wasn't working even a little bit. Every run was a waste of a down.
Play to your strengths until the opposition proves they can stop you.

Doesn't that make sense?

And as far as i can see, our running game is just not working this year. So should you be stubborn, just to say "Look! We ran the ball!" so that people don't say your one dimensional?
Do what works for that game. If you CAN run, GREAT!
If you can't, do something else.
Or in the end, you will end up on the wrong end of the won-lost column.
You know.....just like we did.

"Cheesey" wrote:



Yes, it totally makes sense. When talking about this game and this game only, it completely makes sense.

I try to emphasise that we're talking about this game and this game only but people will still bring up other games.

OK, this game, and this game only (for the 3rd time now) - the run was a complete waste of a down. I showed in the play by play on two threads now that running wasted a down and passing worked. We had essentially 3 TD drives including the fumble in the end zone. They were pretty much all passes. When we ran, we had to punt.

Note that I'm talking about this game and this game only.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
PackerTraxx
14 years ago
In the big picture we are toast without a running game. Unless your goal is to simply get into the playoffs. JMHO
Why is Jerry Kramer not in the Hall of Fame?
zombieslayer
14 years ago
Wow. I said it 4 times. Maybe I have to say it 5 times.

This thread is about the game VERSUS THE ATLANTA FALCONS ONLY.
This thread is about the game VERSUS THE ATLANTA FALCONS ONLY.
This thread is about the game VERSUS THE ATLANTA FALCONS ONLY.
This thread is about the game VERSUS THE ATLANTA FALCONS ONLY.
This thread is about the game VERSUS THE ATLANTA FALCONS ONLY.

OK. Now that we're clear (hopefully) that we're talking about the Atlanta Falcons game, please continue.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (5h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (5h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
bboystyle (5h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
Mucky Tundra (8h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
Mucky Tundra (8h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
Mucky Tundra (8h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
buckeyepackfan (9h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks
Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak
beast (21-Dec) : So far the college playoffs have sucked... One team absolutely dominates the other
beast (21-Dec) : Well even if you weren't positive towards a guy, you wouldn't nessarily want to tell the media that (if they don't know about it)
Martha Careful (21-Dec) : I think MLF want Love to look past the end half issues, and feel good about his play. Our coaches generally keep a very positive tone.
beast (21-Dec) : I think a great running game will do that for most QBs
packerfanoutwest (21-Dec) : Coach Matt LaFleur has said quarterback Jordan Love is playing the best football of his career.
beast (21-Dec) : Oh, that's how you keep beating buckeye, with cheating
Zero2Cool (20-Dec) : There is a rule that if your name starts with 'b' you lose 15 points. Hey, I don't make the rules, I just enforce them!
wpr (20-Dec) : and then there is Beast. Running away with it all.
beast (20-Dec) : As of tonight, 3 way tie for 2nd in Pick'em, that battle is interesting!
beast (20-Dec) : Lions vs Vikings could be the main last game as it could determine division winners or #1 vs #2 seed
Mucky Tundra (20-Dec) : Or if KC needs to win for the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (20-Dec) : Right now it looks like the only prime worthy games are Det-Minny and KC-Denver (if Denver can clinch a wild card spot)
Mucky Tundra (20-Dec) : The entirety of week 18 being listed as flex is weird
Zero2Cool (19-Dec) : Matt LaFleur today says unequivocally "Ted Thompson had nothing to do with the drafting of Jordan Love."
Zero2Cool (19-Dec) : Apparently, the editing is what pieces comments together. That Ted thing ... fake news.
Zero2Cool (19-Dec) : LaFleur "opportunity that Ted Thompson thought was too good to pass up"
Zero2Cool (19-Dec) : Jordan Love pick was Ted Thompson's idea.
Mucky Tundra (19-Dec) : Kyle Shanahan on signing De'Vondre Campbell as a FA last offseason: “We obviously made a mistake.”
packerfanoutwest (19-Dec) : Alexander’s last season with GB
Martha Careful (18-Dec) : if I were a professional athlete, I would probably look to see who the agent is for Kirk Cousins and then use him
beast (18-Dec) : $100 million fully guaranteed Kirk Cousins gets benched for rookie
Mucky Tundra (18-Dec) : a lower case b
Mucky Tundra (18-Dec) : The real lie is how beast capitalized his name in his message while it's normally spelled with
packerfanoutwest (18-Dec) : haha that's a lie
beast (17-Dec) : Despite what lies other might tell, Beast didn't hate the Winter Warnings, it felt refreshing to Beast for some reason.
Zero2Cool (17-Dec) : whiteout uniforms in general are pretty lame and weak. NFL greed at it's worst
Martha Careful (17-Dec) : The Viking uniforms, the whiteout uniforms specifically absolutely suck
beast (17-Dec) : Thanks Zero2Cool, looks a lot better now
beast (17-Dec) : Seems like someone has a crush on me, can't stop talking about me
Zero2Cool (17-Dec) : Should be gooder now. The forum default theme went to goofy land.
Zero2Cool (17-Dec) : What the hell
packerfanoutwest (17-Dec) : yeah beast hates the Winter Warning Unies
Mucky Tundra (16-Dec) : Okay I'm glad to know it's not just something happening to me lol
Mucky Tundra (16-Dec) : Zero, did you copy the Packers uniforms from last night and white out the board?
beast (16-Dec) : Oh crap, is the board going to the Winter Warning Uniforms too?!? It's all white on white right now!
Zero2Cool (16-Dec) : WR Odell Beckham Jr is officially a free agent after clearing waivers.
Zero2Cool (16-Dec) : Packers are 6th in sacks.
Zero2Cool (16-Dec) : RB David Montgomery will undergo season-ending knee surgery.
Mucky Tundra (16-Dec) : Dan Campbell on onside kick with 12 minutes left: In hindsight, wish I didn’t do that
Zero2Cool (16-Dec) : They have that whole 12th man thing so ...
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.