Packers release Montgomery· Page 3

bigfog
Registered

14 years ago

You guys advocating for Moss are crazy. The last thing this team needs is a quitter, prima donna, has-been. If the dude wasn't happy playing with Brady or Favre, what makes you think he'll be content with Rodgers?

Ludicrous.

"I wouldn't root for the Minnesota Vikings to win a chess match against Nazi Germany."

musccy
Veteran Member

14 years ago

#22

Nice I've been waiting for something to happen. .

"gbguy20" wrote:

You know the team did pick up 4 guys off of waivers last week, including 2 that made meaningful contributions vs. the Jets (Walden, Green)

Greg C.
Registered

14 years ago

#23

Ehh, he's got to be an upgrade over some of our OLBs. Anything to give us another pass rusher.

"millertime" wrote:

What makes you so sure he'd be an upgrade? He's declined so much that he got waived.

blank

packer98
Registered

14 years ago

#24

We gave Harrell a shot, why not Merriman? He has to be a bit of an upgrade from some of the guys we have. I'd bring him in for looksee atleast. he might be a good compliment to Matthews.

blank

gbguy20
Veteran Member

14 years ago

#25

Nice I've been waiting for something to happen. .

"musccy" wrote:

You know the team did pick up 4 guys off of waivers last week, including 2 that made meaningful contributions vs. the Jets (Walden, Green)

"gbguy20" wrote:

I meant more like something to happen with the PUP guys which im hoping this move is a sign of.

also im surprised no1 has compared merrimam coming out of SD to charles woodson coming out of OAK

BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.

Greg C.
Registered

14 years ago

#26

We gave Harrell a shot, why not Merriman? He has to be a bit of an upgrade from some of the guys we have. I'd bring him in for looksee atleast. he might be a good compliment to Matthews.

"packer98" wrote:

Why? Why does he have to be an upgrade? And why do people keep repeating this with no evidence whatsoever?

Here's my evidence to the contrary: He's done almost nothing in the last three seasons except get injured, and the Chargers put him on IR and then waived him.

blank

beast
Select Member

14 years ago

#27

My guess is this is for the PUP players... and a LB will be next... LB Robert Francois or ILB Matt Wilhelm or ODiyral Briggs.

~ Francois has been around longer and should know the system the best but hasn't done too much and got leap frogged at OLB by new OLB Erik Walden. Also has played on some STs and has played both OLB and ILB.

~ Wilhelm is a vet who's hasn't done too much other than start one season and back-up and STs a lot of seasons at ILB.

~ Briggs is very raw but very athletic 4-3 DE who's too small to play there other than maybe a KGB role of pass rush and limited run stopping... he's been trying to covert to OLB. But he's having troubles... he needs an attacking system... one that he knows what he's doing before the snap... and not one that is based on reading the offense after the snap of the ball because he has big trouble with that.

porky88
Veteran Member

14 years ago

#28

I suspect Al Harris or James Starks will be activated first.

http://www.row12.com/

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

14 years ago

#29

I suspect Al Harris or James Starks will be activated first.

"porky88" wrote:

BIGBY!

:P

Pack93z
Select Member

14 years ago

#30

Has anyone watched Merriman play in the past two season.. then try and quantify his salary into that production. Not worth a waiver claim.

If he passes waivers and we could sign him on a interim basis that he could prove he still has worth, great. Then try and ink him in the offseason for a longer term.

Maybe he will be hungry and play.. or maybe he pick a new B level porn star to make headlines with in his new city. 😉

"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (1h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (1h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (1h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (1h) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (1h) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (1h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (1h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (1h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (2h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (2h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (2h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (3h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (3h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (3h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (3h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (3h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (4h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (4h) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (4h) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (4h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (5h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (5h) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (5h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (6h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (6h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (7h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (7h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (7h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (7h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (7h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (7h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (7h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (7h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (7h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (7h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (7h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (7h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (7h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (7h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (7h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (8h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (8h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (8h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (8h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (8h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (8h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (8h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

packerfanoutwest (8h) : falcons are already ahead of us

beast (8h) : Packers will get in

beast (8h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS