Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
14 years ago

I appreciated the cue too. I had no idea that discussions were the norm here. ;)

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:




Discussions are your job. I'm here to pontificate and babble, thank you very much.


And practice using emoticons...

:magnifyglass: :pottytrain1: :thumbright: :thumbleft: :headwall: :headwall: :headwall: :headwall: :headwall: :headwall: :headwall:
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Lynn_Dickey
14 years ago

in running YPC at 4.7. Good thing we are a pass first Offense. Discuss

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



Thanks for the queue to discuss on a discussion board, we'd have been lost with that.

"Lynn_Dickey" wrote:



WHOA DUDE...it was a reference to a very famous SNL skit called "Coffee Talk".......it made Mike Myers famous. Sorry if you didn't get the reference. You are probably too young to remember, just liike you are too young to remember the greatness of Lynn Dickey, James Lofton and John Jefferson!
blank
Zero2Cool
14 years ago

WHOA DUDE...it was a reference to a very famous SNL skit called "Coffee Talk".......it made Mike Myers famous. Sorry if you didn't get the reference. You are probably too young to remember, just liike you are too young to remember the greatness of Lynn Dickey, James Lofton and John Jefferson!

"Lynn_Dickey" wrote:



Whoa Dude! That means me = suck @ life!
UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
14 years ago



WHOA DUDE...it was a reference to a very famous SNL skit called "Coffee Talk".......it made Mike Myers famous. Sorry if you didn't get the reference. You are probably too young to remember, just liike you are too young to remember the greatness of Lynn Dickey, James Lofton and John Jefferson!

"Lynn_Dickey" wrote:



And people don't understand why I hate the Cows 100 times more than I hate any of the NFC [strike]Central[/strike] North opponents.

1982. You'll get it. A lot of the others won't.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
macbob
14 years ago
My perception had also been that we were not running as nearly as often as in past years. I also haven't been happy with McCarthy's playcalling all along in that I felt he abandoned the run too quickly. I liked the Mike Sherman run-it-down-their-throat days, daring them to stop us.

So I went back and looked at the stats (just % of runs vs passes) from 2003 to present (2003 was THE year where we ran the ball more than 50% of the time). I didn't look at the circumstances of the runs, but I was pretty sure we had more games in the preceding years where we got a lead and then started running out the clock than we've faced this year.

I was sure the stats (especially including 2003) would show we were running less.

Here's the stats for the last 8 years. Someone had commented that Rodger's runs were skewing the stats, so I subtracted out the QB runs and the % at the end are the number of RB rushes vs Pass Attempts.
Year =Year, PA = Pass Attempts, Rush = Rushes, PA/G = Pass Attempts/Game, R/GA = Rushes/Game, %PA=%Pass Attempts, %R=%Rushes, QB = QB Runs, RB = RB Runs, % RB Rus + % RB Rushes

Year PA Rush PA/G R/G %PA %Run QB RB %RB Rush
2010168 113 33.6 22.6 0.597 0.402 19 94 0.358
2009 553 438 34.6 27.4 0.558 0.441 58 380 0.407
2008 541 437 33.8 27.3 0.553 0.446 56 381 0.413
2007 578 388 36.1 24.2 0.598 0.401 29 359 0.383
2006 630 431 39.4 26.9 0.593 0.406 23 408 0.393
2005 626 398 39.1 24.9 0.611 0.388 18 380 0.377
2004 598 441 37.4 27.6 0.575 0.424 16 425 0.415
2003 473 507 29.5 31.6 0.482 0.517 18 489 0.508

2010 #s are a little low, but a very little low. If GB had run 10 more times in the 1st 5 games (only 2 attempts per game), our Rush % would have been right up there with the preceding years. That's 1 attempt each half. Our overall numbers (22.7 rushes per game is down 4-5 attempts over most years, but our pass attempts are down, too, a sign our offense isn't doing as well overall).

With Favre running less, the QB runs for 03-07 are a lot lower than 08-10 (in fact, Rodgers has run more in 2+ years than Favre in 5 years). But even factoring that in, here's Rodgers vs Favres #s:

QB PA Rush PA/G R/G %PA %Rush QB RB % RB Rush
R 1262 988 34.1 26.7 0.560 0.439 133 855 0.403
F 2905 2165 36.3 27.0 0.572 0.427 104 2061 0.415

Now, these #s only reflect 3 years of Mike Sherman vs 4+ years of McCarthy, but the % rush vs pass are virtually identical. So, as much as I hate to admit it, I was wrong.
Lynn_Dickey
14 years ago



WHOA DUDE...it was a reference to a very famous SNL skit called "Coffee Talk".......it made Mike Myers famous. Sorry if you didn't get the reference. You are probably too young to remember, just liike you are too young to remember the greatness of Lynn Dickey, James Lofton and John Jefferson!

"zombieslayer" wrote:



And people don't understand why I hate the Cows 100 times more than I hate any of the NFC [strike]Central[/strike] North opponents.

1982. You'll get it. A lot of the others won't.

"Lynn_Dickey" wrote:



YES!!! Btw, wasn't that Packer team the most entertaining team we ever had (not great mind you), but a whole lotta fun! That 48-47 win on MNF was a gem!
blank
zombieslayer
14 years ago



YES!!! Btw, wasn't that Packer team the most entertaining team we ever had (not great mind you), but a whole lotta fun! That 48-47 win on MNF was a gem!

"Lynn_Dickey" wrote:



That was 1983 and I think the 'Skins won it all that year, AND had the NFL's best D.

Best game ever. Yes, we were entertaining. Not good, but definitely entertaining. Dickey, Lofton, Jefferson, Coffman. Fun times.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
warhawk
14 years ago
I find it ironic that we have ONE long run and people want to discredit the overall numbers. If anything our average is probably skewed LESS than most teams who have more big runs in their totals than we do.

I wish we could create MORE breakaways but that big long run is not something we do often. Even a 30 yarder now and then would be nice and I can guarantee the other teams with higher rushing numbers has SEVERAL runs in the 30+ yard range.

A RB is going to break one now and then so you can't take it away. It's not a stat your going to see only a couple times a year or something. Long runs happen. They count, period. I just wish we could get a guy loose a little more often.

The NFL is all about making big plays and making them when it counts and people want to say "ah well, it wouldn't look so good if it weren't for that one run" is rediculous to me.

McNabb didn't do squat throwing the ball until that 40+ yard bomb for a TD. Too bad that counted I guess, huh?
"The train is leaving the station."
zombieslayer
14 years ago

My perception had also been that we were not running as nearly as often as in past years. I also haven't been happy with McCarthy's playcalling all along in that I felt he abandoned the run too quickly. I liked the Mike Sherman run-it-down-their-throat days, daring them to stop us.

So I went back and looked at the stats (just % of runs vs passes) from 2003 to present (2003 was THE year where we ran the ball more than 50% of the time). I didn't look at the circumstances of the runs, but I was pretty sure we had more games in the preceding years where we got a lead and then started running out the clock than we've faced this year.

I was sure the stats (especially including 2003) would show we were running less.

Here's the stats for the last 8 years. Someone had commented that Rodger's runs were skewing the stats, so I subtracted out the QB runs and the % at the end are the number of RB rushes vs Pass Attempts.
Year =Year, PA = Pass Attempts, Rush = Rushes, PA/G = Pass Attempts/Game, R/GA = Rushes/Game, %PA=%Pass Attempts, %R=%Rushes, QB = QB Runs, RB = RB Runs, % RB Rus + % RB Rushes

Year PA Rush PA/G R/G %PA %Run QB RB %RB Rush
2010168 113 33.6 22.6 0.597 0.402 19 94 0.358
2009 553 438 34.6 27.4 0.558 0.441 58 380 0.407
2008 541 437 33.8 27.3 0.553 0.446 56 381 0.413
2007 578 388 36.1 24.2 0.598 0.401 29 359 0.383
2006 630 431 39.4 26.9 0.593 0.406 23 408 0.393
2005 626 398 39.1 24.9 0.611 0.388 18 380 0.377
2004 598 441 37.4 27.6 0.575 0.424 16 425 0.415
2003 473 507 29.5 31.6 0.482 0.517 18 489 0.508

2010 #s are a little low, but a very little low. If GB had run 10 more times in the 1st 5 games (only 2 attempts per game), our Rush % would have been right up there with the preceding years. That's 1 attempt each half. Our overall numbers (22.7 rushes per game is down 4-5 attempts over most years, but our pass attempts are down, too, a sign our offense isn't doing as well overall).

With Favre running less, the QB runs for 03-07 are a lot lower than 08-10 (in fact, Rodgers has run more in 2+ years than Favre in 5 years). But even factoring that in, here's Rodgers vs Favres #s:

QB PA Rush PA/G R/G %PA %Rush QB RB % RB Rush
R 1262 988 34.1 26.7 0.560 0.439 133 855 0.403
F 2905 2165 36.3 27.0 0.572 0.427 104 2061 0.415

Now, these #s only reflect 3 years of Mike Sherman vs 4+ years of McCarthy, but the % rush vs pass are virtually identical. So, as much as I hate to admit it, I was wrong.

"macbob" wrote:



Virtually identical? Look at the RB rush %. That's what matters. It's significantly higher under Sherman.

The thing is though, we ran under Sherman because that's what we were designed to do. Sherman had a superior OL to what we have today. Green and Grant are about equal in efficiency. Had Grant run behind that line, he would probably have the same stats Green had. Not taking anything away from Green. I just think Grant is that good.

You play to your strengths. Our current strengths are our QB and WRs. What I don't understand is why we got away from the short passing game. Let's throw some short passes and let Driver, Jennings, and Jones get us some YAC, like we did in 2007. Drove D's nuts and kept us on the field all day long. That's one reason why 2007 was so successful.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
porky88
14 years ago

I find it ironic that we have ONE long run and people want to discredit the overall numbers. If anything our average is probably skewed LESS than most teams who have more big runs in their totals than we do.

I wish we could create MORE breakaways but that big long run is not something we do often. Even a 30 yarder now and then would be nice and I can guarantee the other teams with higher rushing numbers has SEVERAL runs in the 30+ yard range.

A RB is going to break one now and then so you can't take it away. It's not a stat your going to see only a couple times a year or something. Long runs happen. They count, period. I just wish we could get a guy loose a little more often.

The NFL is all about making big plays and making them when it counts and people want to say "ah well, it wouldn't look so good if it weren't for that one run" is rediculous to me.

McNabb didn't do squat throwing the ball until that 40+ yard bomb for a TD. Too bad that counted I guess, huh?

"warhawk" wrote:



If Brandon Jackson's history was different/better, I'd take this side. Much like I don't discredit McNabb's bomb because he's done it time and time again.

But Jackson's history says he hasn't earned the benefit of the doubt. His career yards per carry average is around four. Sure, that's not terrible, but a lot of the better runs have come on 3rd and longs, with the defense playing a deep zone or just out of a draw play on first and ten.

It's yards, but it's not the same thing as taking a stretch play and cutting back for seven, eight, nine or ten yards.

Jackson has proven that he cannot line up and take the hand-off and give the Packers anything more than three yards. That's what he'll get.

I agree the Packers need to run the ball more, but only because they need attempts to setup their playaction passing game. In addition, they have to pickup the 3rd and twos of the world.

However, they aren't going to get the production I think people are craving for out of Jackson. He's just not that type of RB. 4.6 yards per carry on 20 carries a game translates to over 1,000 yards on the ground. I'm sorry, but that's wishful thinking.
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (4h) : Kaydon Finley, son of Jermichael Finley, commits to Notre Dame
dfosterf (3-Jul) : Make sure to send my props to him! A plus move!
Zero2Cool (3-Jul) : My cousin, yes.
dfosterf (3-Jul) : That was your brother the GB press gazette referenced with the red cross draft props thing, yes?
Zero2Cool (2-Jul) : Packers gonna unveil new throwback helmet in few weeks.
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : I know it's Kleiman but this stuff writes itself
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : "Make sure she signs the NDA before asking for a Happy Ending!"
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : @NFL_DovKleiman Powerful: Deshaun Watson is taking Shedeur Sanders 'under his wing' as a mentor to the Browns QBs
Zero2Cool (30-Jun) : Dolphins get (back) Minkah Fitzpatrick in trade
Zero2Cool (30-Jun) : Steelers land Jalen Ramsey via Trade
dfosterf (26-Jun) : I think it would be great to have someone like Tom Grossi or Andy Herman on the Board of Directors so he/they could inform us
dfosterf (26-Jun) : Fair enough, WPR. Thing is, I have been a long time advocate to at least have some inkling of the dynamics within the board.
wpr (26-Jun) : 1st world owners/stockholders problems dfosterf.
Martha Careful (25-Jun) : I would have otherwise admirably served
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Also, no more provision for a write-in candidate, so Martha is off the table at least for this year
dfosterf (25-Jun) : You do have to interpret the boring fine print, but all stockholders all see he is on the ballot
dfosterf (25-Jun) : It also says he is subject to another ballot in 2028. I recall nothing of this nature with Murphy
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy is on my ballot subject to me penciling him in as a no.
dfosterf (25-Jun) : I thought it used to be we voted for the whatever they called the 45, and then they voted for the seven, and then they voted for Mark Murphy
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Because I was too lazy to change my address, I haven't voted fot years until this year
dfosterf (25-Jun) : of the folks that run this team. I do not recall Mark Murphy being subject to our vote.
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy yay or nay is on the pre-approved ballot that we always approve because we are uninformed and lazy, along with all the rest
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Weird question. Very esoteric. For stockholders. Also lengthy. Sorry. Offseason.
Zero2Cool (25-Jun) : Maybe wicked wind chill made it worse?
Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : And then he signs with Cleveland in the offseason
Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : @SharpFootball WR Diontae Johnson just admitted he refused to enter a game in 41° weather last year in Baltimore because he felt “ice cold”
Zero2Cool (24-Jun) : Yawn. Rodgers says he is "pretty sure" this be final season.
Zero2Cool (23-Jun) : PFT claims Packers are having extension talks with Zach Tom, Quay Walker.
Mucky Tundra (20-Jun) : GB-Minnesota 2004 Wild Card game popped up on my YouTube page....UGH
beast (20-Jun) : Hmm 🤔 re-signing Walker before Tom? Sounds highly questionable to me.
Mucky Tundra (19-Jun) : One person on Twitter=cannon law
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Well, to ONE person on Tweeter
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : According to Tweeter
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Packers are working on extension for LT Walker they hope to have done before camp
dfosterf (18-Jun) : E4B landed at Andrews last night
dfosterf (18-Jun) : 101 in a 60
dfosterf (18-Jun) : FAFO
Zero2Cool (18-Jun) : one year $4m with incentives to make it up to $6m
dfosterf (18-Jun) : Or Lions
dfosterf (18-Jun) : Beats the hell out of a Vikings signing
Zero2Cool (18-Jun) : Baltimore Ravens now have signed former Packers CB Jaire Alexander.
dfosterf (14-Jun) : TWO magnificent strikes for touchdowns. Lose the pennstate semigeezer non nfl backup
dfosterf (14-Jun) : There was minicamp Thursday. My man Taylor Engersma threw
dfosterf (11-Jun) : There will be a mini camp practice Thursday.
Zero2Cool (11-Jun) : He's been sporting a ring for a while now. It's probably Madonna.
Martha Careful (10-Jun) : We only do the tea before whoopee, it relaxes me.
wpr (10-Jun) : That's awesome Martha.
Mucky Tundra (10-Jun) : How's the ayahuasca tea he makes, Martha?
Martha Careful (10-Jun) : Turns out he like older women
Martha Careful (10-Jun) : I wasn't supposed to say anything, but yes the word is out and we are happy 😂😂😂
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
4-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

2-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

2-Jul / Fantasy Sports Talk / dfosterf

1-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

29-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

25-Jun / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

23-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

18-Jun / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

16-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

15-Jun / Random Babble / Martha Careful

14-Jun / Around The NFL / beast

14-Jun / Community Welcome! / dfosterf

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.