Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
14 years ago

I appreciated the cue too. I had no idea that discussions were the norm here. ;)

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:




Discussions are your job. I'm here to pontificate and babble, thank you very much.


And practice using emoticons...

:magnifyglass: :pottytrain1: :thumbright: :thumbleft: :headwall: :headwall: :headwall: :headwall: :headwall: :headwall: :headwall:
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Lynn_Dickey
14 years ago

in running YPC at 4.7. Good thing we are a pass first Offense. Discuss

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



Thanks for the queue to discuss on a discussion board, we'd have been lost with that.

"Lynn_Dickey" wrote:



WHOA DUDE...it was a reference to a very famous SNL skit called "Coffee Talk".......it made Mike Myers famous. Sorry if you didn't get the reference. You are probably too young to remember, just liike you are too young to remember the greatness of Lynn Dickey, James Lofton and John Jefferson!
blank
Zero2Cool
14 years ago

WHOA DUDE...it was a reference to a very famous SNL skit called "Coffee Talk".......it made Mike Myers famous. Sorry if you didn't get the reference. You are probably too young to remember, just liike you are too young to remember the greatness of Lynn Dickey, James Lofton and John Jefferson!

"Lynn_Dickey" wrote:



Whoa Dude! That means me = suck @ life!
UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
14 years ago



WHOA DUDE...it was a reference to a very famous SNL skit called "Coffee Talk".......it made Mike Myers famous. Sorry if you didn't get the reference. You are probably too young to remember, just liike you are too young to remember the greatness of Lynn Dickey, James Lofton and John Jefferson!

"Lynn_Dickey" wrote:



And people don't understand why I hate the Cows 100 times more than I hate any of the NFC [strike]Central[/strike] North opponents.

1982. You'll get it. A lot of the others won't.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
macbob
14 years ago
My perception had also been that we were not running as nearly as often as in past years. I also haven't been happy with McCarthy's playcalling all along in that I felt he abandoned the run too quickly. I liked the Mike Sherman run-it-down-their-throat days, daring them to stop us.

So I went back and looked at the stats (just % of runs vs passes) from 2003 to present (2003 was THE year where we ran the ball more than 50% of the time). I didn't look at the circumstances of the runs, but I was pretty sure we had more games in the preceding years where we got a lead and then started running out the clock than we've faced this year.

I was sure the stats (especially including 2003) would show we were running less.

Here's the stats for the last 8 years. Someone had commented that Rodger's runs were skewing the stats, so I subtracted out the QB runs and the % at the end are the number of RB rushes vs Pass Attempts.
Year =Year, PA = Pass Attempts, Rush = Rushes, PA/G = Pass Attempts/Game, R/GA = Rushes/Game, %PA=%Pass Attempts, %R=%Rushes, QB = QB Runs, RB = RB Runs, % RB Rus + % RB Rushes

Year PA Rush PA/G R/G %PA %Run QB RB %RB Rush
2010168 113 33.6 22.6 0.597 0.402 19 94 0.358
2009 553 438 34.6 27.4 0.558 0.441 58 380 0.407
2008 541 437 33.8 27.3 0.553 0.446 56 381 0.413
2007 578 388 36.1 24.2 0.598 0.401 29 359 0.383
2006 630 431 39.4 26.9 0.593 0.406 23 408 0.393
2005 626 398 39.1 24.9 0.611 0.388 18 380 0.377
2004 598 441 37.4 27.6 0.575 0.424 16 425 0.415
2003 473 507 29.5 31.6 0.482 0.517 18 489 0.508

2010 #s are a little low, but a very little low. If GB had run 10 more times in the 1st 5 games (only 2 attempts per game), our Rush % would have been right up there with the preceding years. That's 1 attempt each half. Our overall numbers (22.7 rushes per game is down 4-5 attempts over most years, but our pass attempts are down, too, a sign our offense isn't doing as well overall).

With Favre running less, the QB runs for 03-07 are a lot lower than 08-10 (in fact, Rodgers has run more in 2+ years than Favre in 5 years). But even factoring that in, here's Rodgers vs Favres #s:

QB PA Rush PA/G R/G %PA %Rush QB RB % RB Rush
R 1262 988 34.1 26.7 0.560 0.439 133 855 0.403
F 2905 2165 36.3 27.0 0.572 0.427 104 2061 0.415

Now, these #s only reflect 3 years of Mike Sherman vs 4+ years of McCarthy, but the % rush vs pass are virtually identical. So, as much as I hate to admit it, I was wrong.
Lynn_Dickey
14 years ago



WHOA DUDE...it was a reference to a very famous SNL skit called "Coffee Talk".......it made Mike Myers famous. Sorry if you didn't get the reference. You are probably too young to remember, just liike you are too young to remember the greatness of Lynn Dickey, James Lofton and John Jefferson!

"zombieslayer" wrote:



And people don't understand why I hate the Cows 100 times more than I hate any of the NFC [strike]Central[/strike] North opponents.

1982. You'll get it. A lot of the others won't.

"Lynn_Dickey" wrote:



YES!!! Btw, wasn't that Packer team the most entertaining team we ever had (not great mind you), but a whole lotta fun! That 48-47 win on MNF was a gem!
blank
zombieslayer
14 years ago



YES!!! Btw, wasn't that Packer team the most entertaining team we ever had (not great mind you), but a whole lotta fun! That 48-47 win on MNF was a gem!

"Lynn_Dickey" wrote:



That was 1983 and I think the 'Skins won it all that year, AND had the NFL's best D.

Best game ever. Yes, we were entertaining. Not good, but definitely entertaining. Dickey, Lofton, Jefferson, Coffman. Fun times.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
warhawk
14 years ago
I find it ironic that we have ONE long run and people want to discredit the overall numbers. If anything our average is probably skewed LESS than most teams who have more big runs in their totals than we do.

I wish we could create MORE breakaways but that big long run is not something we do often. Even a 30 yarder now and then would be nice and I can guarantee the other teams with higher rushing numbers has SEVERAL runs in the 30+ yard range.

A RB is going to break one now and then so you can't take it away. It's not a stat your going to see only a couple times a year or something. Long runs happen. They count, period. I just wish we could get a guy loose a little more often.

The NFL is all about making big plays and making them when it counts and people want to say "ah well, it wouldn't look so good if it weren't for that one run" is rediculous to me.

McNabb didn't do squat throwing the ball until that 40+ yard bomb for a TD. Too bad that counted I guess, huh?
"The train is leaving the station."
zombieslayer
14 years ago

My perception had also been that we were not running as nearly as often as in past years. I also haven't been happy with McCarthy's playcalling all along in that I felt he abandoned the run too quickly. I liked the Mike Sherman run-it-down-their-throat days, daring them to stop us.

So I went back and looked at the stats (just % of runs vs passes) from 2003 to present (2003 was THE year where we ran the ball more than 50% of the time). I didn't look at the circumstances of the runs, but I was pretty sure we had more games in the preceding years where we got a lead and then started running out the clock than we've faced this year.

I was sure the stats (especially including 2003) would show we were running less.

Here's the stats for the last 8 years. Someone had commented that Rodger's runs were skewing the stats, so I subtracted out the QB runs and the % at the end are the number of RB rushes vs Pass Attempts.
Year =Year, PA = Pass Attempts, Rush = Rushes, PA/G = Pass Attempts/Game, R/GA = Rushes/Game, %PA=%Pass Attempts, %R=%Rushes, QB = QB Runs, RB = RB Runs, % RB Rus + % RB Rushes

Year PA Rush PA/G R/G %PA %Run QB RB %RB Rush
2010168 113 33.6 22.6 0.597 0.402 19 94 0.358
2009 553 438 34.6 27.4 0.558 0.441 58 380 0.407
2008 541 437 33.8 27.3 0.553 0.446 56 381 0.413
2007 578 388 36.1 24.2 0.598 0.401 29 359 0.383
2006 630 431 39.4 26.9 0.593 0.406 23 408 0.393
2005 626 398 39.1 24.9 0.611 0.388 18 380 0.377
2004 598 441 37.4 27.6 0.575 0.424 16 425 0.415
2003 473 507 29.5 31.6 0.482 0.517 18 489 0.508

2010 #s are a little low, but a very little low. If GB had run 10 more times in the 1st 5 games (only 2 attempts per game), our Rush % would have been right up there with the preceding years. That's 1 attempt each half. Our overall numbers (22.7 rushes per game is down 4-5 attempts over most years, but our pass attempts are down, too, a sign our offense isn't doing as well overall).

With Favre running less, the QB runs for 03-07 are a lot lower than 08-10 (in fact, Rodgers has run more in 2+ years than Favre in 5 years). But even factoring that in, here's Rodgers vs Favres #s:

QB PA Rush PA/G R/G %PA %Rush QB RB % RB Rush
R 1262 988 34.1 26.7 0.560 0.439 133 855 0.403
F 2905 2165 36.3 27.0 0.572 0.427 104 2061 0.415

Now, these #s only reflect 3 years of Mike Sherman vs 4+ years of McCarthy, but the % rush vs pass are virtually identical. So, as much as I hate to admit it, I was wrong.

"macbob" wrote:



Virtually identical? Look at the RB rush %. That's what matters. It's significantly higher under Sherman.

The thing is though, we ran under Sherman because that's what we were designed to do. Sherman had a superior OL to what we have today. Green and Grant are about equal in efficiency. Had Grant run behind that line, he would probably have the same stats Green had. Not taking anything away from Green. I just think Grant is that good.

You play to your strengths. Our current strengths are our QB and WRs. What I don't understand is why we got away from the short passing game. Let's throw some short passes and let Driver, Jennings, and Jones get us some YAC, like we did in 2007. Drove D's nuts and kept us on the field all day long. That's one reason why 2007 was so successful.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
porky88
14 years ago

I find it ironic that we have ONE long run and people want to discredit the overall numbers. If anything our average is probably skewed LESS than most teams who have more big runs in their totals than we do.

I wish we could create MORE breakaways but that big long run is not something we do often. Even a 30 yarder now and then would be nice and I can guarantee the other teams with higher rushing numbers has SEVERAL runs in the 30+ yard range.

A RB is going to break one now and then so you can't take it away. It's not a stat your going to see only a couple times a year or something. Long runs happen. They count, period. I just wish we could get a guy loose a little more often.

The NFL is all about making big plays and making them when it counts and people want to say "ah well, it wouldn't look so good if it weren't for that one run" is rediculous to me.

McNabb didn't do squat throwing the ball until that 40+ yard bomb for a TD. Too bad that counted I guess, huh?

"warhawk" wrote:



If Brandon Jackson's history was different/better, I'd take this side. Much like I don't discredit McNabb's bomb because he's done it time and time again.

But Jackson's history says he hasn't earned the benefit of the doubt. His career yards per carry average is around four. Sure, that's not terrible, but a lot of the better runs have come on 3rd and longs, with the defense playing a deep zone or just out of a draw play on first and ten.

It's yards, but it's not the same thing as taking a stretch play and cutting back for seven, eight, nine or ten yards.

Jackson has proven that he cannot line up and take the hand-off and give the Packers anything more than three yards. That's what he'll get.

I agree the Packers need to run the ball more, but only because they need attempts to setup their playaction passing game. In addition, they have to pickup the 3rd and twos of the world.

However, they aren't going to get the production I think people are craving for out of Jackson. He's just not that type of RB. 4.6 yards per carry on 20 carries a game translates to over 1,000 yards on the ground. I'm sorry, but that's wishful thinking.
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (15m) : Jalen Hurts has cleared the concussion protocol. He’s playing Sunday.
Zero2Cool (39m) : 𝕏avier McKinney First Team All-Pro
Zero2Cool (4h) : NFL moves Vikings-Rams playoff tilt to Arizona due to fires
Zero2Cool (4h) : Rams lose home field advantage for Monday game.
Mucky Tundra (19h) : Notre Lame=Notre Dame, Luckeyes=Ohio State, Pedo St=Penn St
Zero2Cool (20h) : ... It clearly was not what we were supposed to be in, certainly."
Zero2Cool (20h) : Hafley says 3rd and 11 call there was a miscommunication.
Zero2Cool (21h) : The only team I know is Texas from that. Who are the other three?
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Notre Lame vs Pedo St tonight and the Luckeyes vs Texas tomorrow
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Stud
Zero2Cool (9-Jan) : E. Cooper. Rookie of Month. Defense.
Mucky Tundra (8-Jan) : @AaronNagler · 2m Both Jordan Love and Malik Willis were Limited participants at Packers practice today.
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : Johnson didn't make it until 2020. Ring 2023. 🤷 Personally, he should have been in years prior to Hall.
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : HUMP DAY
beast (8-Jan) : Guys that have a good shot at making the NFL Hall of Fame usually get into their teams pretty fast
beast (8-Jan) : Yeah, but is Kampman and the others in the NFL Hall of Fame?
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : Johnson was Hall of Fame, 2020. Should haev been in Ring a year later, not three years.
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : I could be wrong there though
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : Guys like Kampman, Tim Harris, Al Harris, etc all over 15 years. Hall of Fame is 5 year wait
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : I guess I see players in Packers Hall come way later
beast (8-Jan) : Yeah, usually teams hall of fames are a much lower bar than the NFL
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : is it uncommon for Hall before Ring?
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : S Xavier McKinney named first-team All-Pro by NFLPA
beast (8-Jan) : I missed it, sorry, but he got into the NFL Hall of Fame years before that
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : Jones took his sweet ole time!
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : Yeah, he's in the ring of honor, just saw video and his name is up there
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : Didn't they have a thing in 2023 for Jimmy's ring of honor? I swear I saw it
beast (8-Jan) : Though if they're legitimately trying to re-sign MM, then it makes sense.
beast (8-Jan) : Jerry Jones still hasn't put Jimmy Johnson in the Ring of Honor, but he's in the NFL's Hall of Fame, Jones is petty
Mucky Tundra (8-Jan) : Unless the Cowboys are planning an extension, seems kinda petty
beast (8-Jan) : Cowboys denied Bears request
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : From what I'm reading, MM is under contract through the 14th of January; after that he's free game
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : McCarthy let go or not extended??
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Chicago Bears have asked the Dallas Cowboys permission to interview Mike McCarthy for head coaching vacancy
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : The winners page that is
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : I was not hoping for that. It messes up the page lol
beast (6-Jan) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3.
beast (6-Jan) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3.
beast (6-Jan) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : congrats beast on 2024 !
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : congrats porky on winning 2023 pick'em! (oops sorry)
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : Packers have $60M+ of 2025 cap space on paper TODAY.
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Missed FG into a Lions TD; that'll do pig, that'll do
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : That might be it for the Vikings
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Oh so the refs do know what intentional grounding is
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : what the hell was that Goff?! Not much pressure and he just air mails it to Harrison
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : They really need to to get rid of the auto first down for illegal contact
Martha Careful (6-Jan) : watching the Vikings and Lions it's understandable why they swept the Packers. So much better product
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Even when GB got pressure he was throwing darts; vs no pressure on that last pass he just air mails an open guy
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : didn't have guys in his face ... pressure makes difference
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
28m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

40m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22h / Around The NFL / beast

9-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

9-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

8-Jan / Around The NFL / beast

7-Jan / Fantasy Sports Talk / wpr

7-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

7-Jan / Fantasy Sports Talk / Zero2Cool

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

6-Jan / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.