longtimefan
14 years ago
Anyone have the actual personal conduct policy....
ILikeThePackers39
14 years ago

MySpace'n, Calling, Texting, etc to a fellow co-worker who does not want the contact is wrong, no matter how you try to slice it.


Brett's innocent though, he did nothing he's accused of. You'll see, it will take its course.

"RedSoxExcel" wrote:



Do you really think it was all unwanted though? Would someone really be crazy enough to send three seperate random pictures of their stuff without any contact from the other side? I agree Favre is weird but even he isn't that weird (well at least I hope not).

My assumption, they had an affair, thats why she hasn't come out pubically because Favre is married. I don't think it was harassment or whatever, just plain adultery, which is not suspension worthy - that should not be the NFL's business.

I think Favre will admit to the affair to Goodel and so will Jenn and they will say they don't have enough evidence to prove harrassment, therefore Favre gets a fine.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:




Answering the bolded part: Of course someone would, if that someone was accustomed to women swooning at the thought of spending time with him. Would I? No, but I'm not a handsome future HOF QB worth a quarter billion dollars.

These folks don't play by our rules, and I doubt it would even occur to someone like Favre that the lady wouldn't be interested.
blank
longtimefan
14 years ago
Its all about sexual harassment, not affairs, or Denanna being okay with it all

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/10/12/league-emphasizes-that-favre-investigation-is-about-sexual-harassment/ 

From the moment the league announced that it was investigating the allegation that former Jets (now Vikings) quarterback Brett Favre sent voice messages and photos to a former Jets in-house sideline reporter, the reason for the league's zeal was obvious.

An excellent summary of the status of the situation in Tuesday's SportsBusiness Daily includes the key quote from NFL spokesman Greg Aiello: "It's a totally different world with the Internet. Information and videos that never once existed are the new reality and the new news. But our issue here is the conduct of our employees and the question of whether this is a case of sexual harassment."

The fact that Favre first became exposed (sometimes the double entendres are impossible to avoid) to Jenn Sterger in the workplace compels the league to investigate whether Favre's conduct may have risen to the level of sexual harassment. As we explained in this week's Monday 10-pack, "sexual harassment" means much more than a boss harassing his secretary for sex. The "hostile work environment' form of sexual harassment requires careful consideration of a stew of often disputed facts, viewed both from the perspective of the objective interpretation of the words and deeds and the subjective reaction by the target of them.

Part of the problem, as mentioned in the 10-pack (did we mention the 10-pack?), is the surprising reality that neither the league nor the Jets have provided to Jets players specific guidance on what sexual harassment is, the conduct that may give rise to it, and the potential consequences for engaging in it.

Moving forward generally, count on that changing.

Moving forward specifically, the question of whether Sterger cooperates continues to be critical to the outcome. Without her input, the league has no context within which to assess whether Favre's conduct was unwelcome. Without her version of the events, Favre could go behind closed doors with NFL Security and say something like, "You should see the pictures she sent to me."

If the league concludes sexual harassment occurred, the Personal Conduct Policy becomes the vehicle for disciplining him. Even without a finding of sexual harassment, the Personal Conduct Policy contains sufficient "do what we want to do when and how we want to do it" looseness in the joints to allow the league to do whatever it wants with Favre. Whenever the league wants to do it. However the league wants to do it.

Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
I think she's holding out for a settlement.

Either that, or as this article implies, she's afraid Favre has kept some pretty damning evidence himself.
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
14 years ago
Harassment is the only avenue the NFL has any business in.... can you imagine trying to police whom NFL players hook up with and when.. these are free men and as long as they stay within the letter of the law.. they have the right to pursue any relationship they wish.

People can form there own opinion, if they wish, from there.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Formo
14 years ago

Harassment is the only avenue the NFL has any business in.... can you imagine trying to police whom NFL players hook up with and when.. these are free men and as long as they stay within the letter of the law.. they have the right to pursue any relationship they wish.

People can form there own opinion, if they wish, from there.

"pack93z" wrote:



This.

And that being the case, is this a case of harassment or just adultery (or attempted)?
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Pack93z
14 years ago
I forgot one piece to my above.. they, a husband, father or son, will have to answer to those closest to them when it hits the public sector.

Can you image the comments Brett's daughters will be subjected to for their fathers "accused" indiscretions. Deanna has some level of accountability in this, as she as excepted him back in the past. His daughters and mother are probably the only other victims past possibly the accuser.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago

as long as they stay within the letter of the law.. they have the right to pursue any relationship they wish.

"pack93z" wrote:



I don't know the laws of the state of New York, but under the laws of the state of Wisconsin, adultery is a felony. 😉
UserPostedImage
Formo
14 years ago

as long as they stay within the letter of the law.. they have the right to pursue any relationship they wish.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



I don't know the laws of the state of New York, but under the laws of the state of Wisconsin, adultery is a felony. ;)

"pack93z" wrote:



Wow, seriously?!
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Pack93z
14 years ago
Yes.. it is illegal in Wisconsin.. however allegations weren't in Wisconsin.. well yet anyway. 😉
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (3h) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore
packerfanoutwest (9h) : Feliz Navidad!
Zero2Cool (14h) : Merry Christmas!
beast (22h) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
11h / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Dec / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.