14 years ago

poop

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



Indeed.
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
This is without a doubt sexual harassment if the advances were unwelcome. The girl still hasn't actually commented on this publicly, so we still don't know if they were unwelcome. Even her agent says these events "allegedly" happened two years ago.

I tend to agree with Bruce Jacobs. If I were sexually harassed two years ago, I'd file charges two years ago. The fact that she waits two years to make an issue of this makes her look at the very least opportunistic and at the worst like she's totally skewing the story and engaging in a bit of self-serving revisionist history. I don't think these advances were nearly as offensive or unwelcome as she's making them out to be.

I mean . . . two years? And women wonder why they have such a hard time obtaining convictions for sexual offenses? It's not that the courts are stacked against them -- it's that they're so dumb in the way they go about prosecuting offenders.
UserPostedImage
14 years ago

This is without a doubt sexual harassment if the advances were unwelcome. The girl still hasn't actually commented on this publicly, so we still don't know if they were unwelcome. Even her agent says these events "allegedly" happened two years ago.

I tend to agree with Bruce Jacobs. If I were sexually harassed two years ago, I'd file charges two years ago. The fact that she waits two years to make an issue of this makes her look at the very least opportunistic and at the worst like she's totally skewing the story and engaging in a bit of self-serving revisionist history. I don't think these advances were nearly as offensive or unwelcome as she's making them out to be.

I mean . . . two years? And women wonder why they have such a hard time obtaining convictions for sexual offenses? It's not that the courts are stacked against them -- it's that they're so dumb in the way they go about prosecuting offenders.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



Maybe she suspected the shit storm she would start and the amount of negative talk around the country that would be aimed at her. Now she's being called a money grubbing whore by anyone with any allegiance to Favre.

I still haven't heard that she's pursuing it. She clearly wanted Favre and all of this to just go away, other than a few laughs with her friends to ease the tension of an otherwise awkward situation. If she pursues a case now, I'm sure it would require a decent amount of persuasion.
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
That's the problem. With the passage of time it's simply impossible to know what transpired. Maybe she was genuinely interested in him for a while. Maybe she was in it for the money. Maybe she simply wanted the pics for insurance. Or maybe Favre truly is an utter asshole and was shamelessly harassing her. We just can't know.
UserPostedImage
4PackGirl
14 years ago
sure we can know. phone records don't just magically disappear. she has the voicemails & texts. proof. if she called him incessantly, she was actively involved in whatever the hell this is. more proof.

just as we don't know what favre's motives were - we certainly don't know what hers are either.

i still say it's just icky ick icky.
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
I would submit that even we had the complete correspondence between them, we still wouldn't know the full story. There is so much that goes on underneath the surface of a voicemail or text. I know there are messages I send that if people didn't know the inside story would probably be grossly misinterpreted.
UserPostedImage
4PackGirl
14 years ago
well ok there attorney non. 😉
DakotaT
14 years ago



i still say it's just icky ick icky.

"4PackGirl" wrote:



My image of you is totally blown. You are our fanatasy girl and you think this stuff is icky? Thanks alot Julie, prude in vixen clothing. :icon_smile:

I'm not appalled by any of it. I just think it's funny. My old man used to say, if you're gonna play, you better be prepared to pay.
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
14 years ago
To those that say it's "no one's business." Favre plays in a league where you are supposed to follow certain conduct guidelines. IF he did these things, he should be held accountable under the NFL rules.
But just as the linemen on the Vikings that never had to pay for what they did, the 'stars" do seem to get special treatment. Which is of course WRONG.

As was just said, "If you play, someday you will have to pay". So i won't feel sorry for him IF he did these things and got caught.
UserPostedImage
4PackGirl
14 years ago
:whipitgood:



i still say it's just icky ick icky.

"DakotaT" wrote:



My image of you is totally blown. You are our fanatasy girl and you think this stuff is icky? Thanks alot Julie, prude in vixen clothing. :icon_smile:

I'm not appalled by any of it. I just think it's funny. My old man used to say, if you're gonna play, you better be prepared to pay.

"4PackGirl" wrote:



prude, eh? you really don't know me very well, do you?? 😉 :whipitgood:

i'm looking at it from a daughter point of view. if it happened, it's f'in disgusting to find out your dad is takin pics of his junk & sendin it to other chicks.
Fan Shout
beast (5m) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (8h) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (12h) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (14h) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I literally just said it.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
14m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

3h / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

10h / Random Babble / beast

15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.