It's not about getting another skill player. It's about getting better linemen in front of whatever RB they have.
Want to make a costly trade that might make a difference, go after Logan Mankins not some star RB.
:pottytrain2: :horse: :pottytrain2: :horse: :pottytrain2: :horse: :pottytrain2: :horse: :pottytrain2: :horse: :pottytrain2: :horse:
"Wade" wrote:
The thing is, IF someone such as Lynch could be had for a 4th round pick, I don't really think we would get anyone better talent wise than him in the 4th round. Sure, we might, but with Lynch one KNOWS the talent level. The only question would be character issues. If our front office doesn't think their locker room and team could handle the character issues and that he would be a complete flop, then I would have to agree with their decision. But if that's not an issue, then I think they have to go for it.
Of course, he's probably not available for that much and a 3rd would be about the highest I would be willing to go for him. I agree it's more about the O-Line. If there is a linemen out there with borderline elite potential for a 3rd or 4th round pick, then I'd be all about that as well. It's all about taking what options are available.
As for Mankins, the price tag is probably too high. A 4th round pick for Lynch isn't going to jeopardize the future in anyway. Anything over a 1st round pick just might have a negative impact down the road. If a deal like that was made I would hope it would totally pay off otherwise it wouldn't seem so wise. If a guy like Lynch doesn't work out it would suck, but wouldn't be a huge deal. Low risk vs. high reward.
I have no idea what the asking price is for Mankins, but if its reasonable and we can afford to pay the man then I hope it's being looked into.