Could we have gotten Julius Peppers?· Page 2

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

14 years ago

Perhaps. There has been plenty of speculation that current budgets will be "grandfathered" under the new CBA, allowing teams to keep their superstar players through the duration of their budgets. I'm not sure what the precise logistics of that would be, since players were cut in the middle of their contracts all the time under the former CBA.

ILikeThePackers39
Registered

14 years ago

#12

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:

I think I'd need a guarantee of that grandfather clause - Peppers is making a huge wad of cash at this point.

I think the guy's a beast when he comes to play (it has been and can be argued that he's guilty of not doing so at times), and I'd be a fool to say "don't need him, don't want him". However, given the pressure the Packers are getting so far, I just don't feel like it was a miss (other than, you know, him going to a division rival - that's not so good).

blank

Chutzpah515
Registered

14 years ago

#13

No. We don't. There is no cap.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:

Yes, therefore we have PLENTY of cap room at Ted Thompson's disposal.

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

14 years ago

#14

That raises an interesting question: Whom would a grandfather clause favor more -- the teams or the players? In other words, who would have to give up concessions in order for a grandfather clause to be included in the CBA? I can see it going both ways, but it's more likely, in my opinion, that the players would lobby for the clause.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

14 years ago

#15

No. We don't. There is no cap.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:

Doesn't much matter. There's no cap on what I can spend either, but that doesn't mean I can spend whatever I want. Same goes with the Packers. There might not be a cap, but there is a limit on what they can spend.

millertime
Member

14 years ago

#16

I thought the D played well last night. We just couldn't catch a break with penalties and I saw a lot of missed holding calls where the Bears were mugging CM3 or Jenkins. The STs are what cost us the game between the blocked FG and Hesters punt return.

Didn't they block a FG two years ago to beat us?

Johnson
Registered

14 years ago

#17

We have the cap money.
I dunno why Thompson didn't go for Peppers.
He is virtually unstoppable.

To me, Peppers is the sole reason we lost last night.
He is stronger, faster, and scarier than Jared Allen.

If we had Peppers on the packers, could you have imagined
the edge rushers w/Peppers on one side and Clay Matthews on the other?

Sorry..just crying over spilled milk.

"Cal2GreenBay" wrote:

I think by now its pretty obvious that we have a GM who doesn't "believe" in signing high $$ free agents. Its also pretty obvious after last night that such "beliefs" are totally erroneous, and foolish to boot. One word: Reggie.

We lost to a team that is totally inferior in terms of talent, and as much as people have criticized McCarthy, the dumbest coach in the NFC north is easily Lovie Smith. But not by much.

blank

Cal2GreenBay
Registered Topic Starter

14 years ago

#18

"Johnson" wrote:

"Cal2GreenBay" wrote:

They may have been inferior overall talentwise, but from a defensive end standpoint, they have one of the most dominant forces around.

Most of the penalties yesterday was around trying to stop Peppers and the OL overreacting. W/out him on the Bears...penalties go away.

If Peppers were on the packers...penalties go away and penalties increase for other teams.

blank

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

14 years ago

#19

"millertime" wrote:

That was I believe '08 😞 yes

RaiderPride
Senior Member

14 years ago

#20

I love the Packers "D" as is. That is my job, as a fan. This is what the Packers Organization has given me to love this year.

I am not the GM, I have never been a GM. I will never be a GM. So I take what they give me every freakin year and root them on with every fiber of passion in my body.

Last time I looked at the stats Peppers did not have a sack last night. In Fact the Bears "D" as a whole did not have a sack last night. But the Packers had THREE.

I do not even want to waste a single minute of my football season thinking about questions like "Should The Packers Have Got Peppers?"

For me (Personally) it is pointless.

This is my team, So are the Raiders. This is what I have been dealt.

All I can do is root them on.

""People Will Probably Never Remember What You Said, And May Never Remember What You Did. However, People Will Always Remember How You Made Them Feel."

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Mucky Tundra (14h) : TD but another failed 2 pt conversion!

Mucky Tundra (14h) : Ravens still alive, but barely

Mucky Tundra (17h) : Or not...BUT THAT CATCH BY NACUA

Mucky Tundra (17h) : WE MAY HAVE BEEN PREMATURE KANATA

TheKanataThrilla (17h) : Time to make dinner

TheKanataThrilla (18h) : Ouch!!!! Dagger for the Eagles

Mucky Tundra (18h) : DAGGER

TheKanataThrilla (18h) : pass plays

TheKanataThrilla (18h) : Seems some of their passes are too deep. Reminds me of MLF as well.

Mucky Tundra (18h) : Oren Burks with a clutch pass break up...I will now light myself on fire

Mucky Tundra (18h) : a run on 2nd down and 17 from McVay? So that's where MLF gets it from!

Mucky Tundra (18h) : Do or die time for the Rams

TheKanataThrilla (18h) : Kicking field goals are impressive

Mucky Tundra (18h) : Oh that might be a backbreaker

Mucky Tundra (18h) : That's what I thought too, just wasn't sure

TheKanataThrilla (18h) : Kicking doesn't make much sense

Mucky Tundra (18h) : If the Rams score a TD on the upcoming drive, they go for 2, right?

TheKanataThrilla (18h) : Stafford is pretty good with 4th quarter comebacks. I would like to see it.

Mucky Tundra (18h) : YUGE stand by the Rams D there

Mucky Tundra (18h) : killer penalty!

Mucky Tundra (18h) : Philly has to go for this right?

Mucky Tundra (18h) : FUMBLE

TheKanataThrilla (18h) : pre-safety

TheKanataThrilla (18h) : Hurts being a gamer, that tackle on him looked painful on his knee

Mucky Tundra (18h) : Ooo a safety! Things are getting spicy

Martha Careful (19h) : quick analysis, Philly Oline, for the most part, is what our Oline should strive to be

Zero2Cool (20h) : I just saw score. Teams are really struggling with place kicks.

Martha Careful (20h) : nevermind...its on NBC

Martha Careful (20h) : does anyone have a thread to a broadcast? I do not have Peacock.

Mucky Tundra (21h) : Baltimore-Buffalo line has been BAL -1 to -1.5. Gotta be rare that a divisional home team that won 13 games is an underdog at home

Martha Careful (19-Jan) : Ironically, our QB played the best of all 3

beast (19-Jan) : 0-3 NFC North Dominated the Regular season and shutout in the post season

Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : Burn Detroit to the ground over losing to the Commanders? Bit extreme

packerfanoutwest (19-Jan) : Burn your city Lion fans!!

packerfanoutwest (19-Jan) : suck it lions!!!

Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : Knew that playoffs loss for the Lions would hit like crack but I could absolutely OD on this

TheKanataThrilla (19-Jan) : Gonna sleep better after that game

Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : goodnight!

Martha Careful (19-Jan) : goodnight

Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : (not you Martha, it's a saying lol)

Martha Careful (19-Jan) : America loves an underdog

Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : That'll do pig, that'll do

Martha Careful (19-Jan) : 4 turnovers by Goff

Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : that INT was definately on Goff!

Martha Careful (19-Jan) : we arent the only guys who blow contain

Martha Careful (19-Jan) : it should be 4th down

Martha Careful (19-Jan) : I can't blame the call, Ijust would have gone for it

Martha Careful (19-Jan) : miss

TheKanataThrilla (19-Jan) : I had the feeling he was gonna miss

Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : The football gods chortled

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24

Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM

Eagles

10 - 22