I'm sure you're not stupid, but you are acting like you are. Your incorrect statement that I took issue with, and that you had your panties in enough of a bunch to dig up and quote state law about, had nothing to do with law or vacation time in any way. And then you say that I'm the one who has a problem with criticism, because I pointed out that you're wrong? :birdman:
"pack93z" wrote:
What was I wrong about? You implied that he should be entitled to days off or not perform up to expectations..
He took a couple days off for the birth of his child.. which was Wednesday. And he had to be back to work on Saturday night.. all I did was provide information that he doesn't qualify for additional time off or shouldn't be ready for work.. even though the Packers excused him in the days around the birth.
But yet we will give him a free pass on his performance?
So how long do we give him a pass on this? ;)
Okay then.. throw out some other colorful adjective for me.. two threads in a row. Where have I insulted you?
So it is clear.. I am happy he had a good day in camp.. but to announce that he has earned his way onto the squad based on a single practice or base his worth is a stretch in my opinion.
Lets see him do it against the Colts.. I hope he does.
My simple underlying point is.. if he isn't ready to play or can't play why keep him around.
Through two games in a preseason he knows he must shine. he is 1 for 2.
"get_louder_at_lambeau" wrote: