But Zombie throws stats like candy on a playground.. I can throw stats out back that support the element of my stance.
"Pack93z" wrote:
And this is why I'm done arguing this argument.
I did a shitload of research analyzing what it takes to win the Super Bowl. It started with Raider Pride saying "Defense wins Championships" and in the effort to prove him wrong, I proved him right. I found that if we take all the stats there are, the one that had the highest rates of a SB winning team is the #1 D.
Then I found what is more effective - an elite QB or an elite RB. It became obvious an elite QB was more effective and it wasn't even close. I proved all this with hours of research. This stuff isn't exactly easy to do.
In fact, it was so skewed that my conclusion was #1 D is the #1 qualifier for winning the SB. 2nd is an elite QB who doesn't throw INTs in important games. The elite RB couldn't even be considered because it didn't matter. In fact, the elite RB didn't have that much bearing on a team's record, period.
Now if you want to take all the research I've done and just say I'm throwing stats around without any meaning, then you can take my college degree too and I must have apparently paid off my professors as well as I apparently don't know what I'm doing with research, right?
Do you even realize how condescending what you said is? I actually take pride in what I'm doing here. I find football fascinating and would like to believe I'm a contributing member to this forum.
My man Donald Driver
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷