Tezzy
14 years ago

I was sort of surprised he didn't get more of a look at OLB last year.

"earthquake" wrote:



I think last year it was important for Chillar to be prepared at ILB since it was an unknown how effective Barnett was going to be after coming back from the injury.
On top of every beard grows a man.
"The Bears are shell-shocked... and it's breaking my heart."
Dulak
14 years ago

I was sort of surprised he didn't get more of a look at OLB last year.

"Tezzy" wrote:



I think last year it was important for Chillar to be prepared at ILB since it was an unknown how effective Barnett was going to be after coming back from the injury.

"earthquake" wrote:



that and besides chillar was paid to be the best coverage ILB we had ... ya I know he got handed too in the viks game but that is what he was paid for ...

besides we had matthews and kampman to start ...
RajiRoar
14 years ago
anyways, I think of the play in 08' againt Dallas where Chillar forced a fumble that shot into the air, sadly I believe TO caught it.

MintBaconDrivel
Dec, 11, 2012 - FOREVER!
beast
14 years ago
What happens when Chillar is rushing from the outside?

This!



Also how do you embed youtube videos on here?
UserPostedImage
nerdmann
14 years ago
Jones is the starter. They're pissed because he was "injured" and not practicing. A helmet in the bank. Bruised labia.
I would still love to see Bishop outside. Maybe they don't think he can cover. He sure can get after the QB though.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
What exactly is a "stunt" anyway? I see this word used all the time, but I've never been able to dig up an actual definition of the term.
UserPostedImage
beast
14 years ago

What exactly is a "stunt" anyway? I see this word used all the time, but I've never been able to dig up an actual definition of the term.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



A stunt is when a play that is designed to move at least one guy out of his normal position or gap.

Say the defense is playing a 4-3 and the offense runs a pass play.

Normally the DT would attack the OG or OC and a DE would attack the OT.

On a stunt the DT might under cut the DE and go out and attack the OT while the DE goes around the DT and attacks the OG or OC. It's all about creating confusion for the offense with normally leads to the offense making a mistake.


Or like a CB normally covers a WR. But on a stunt last year against the Bears one of the Packers CBs (I think Williams) blitzed Cuter and Cutler saw it and tried to get it to what he thought was an open WR. Well other than Collins was also part of the stunt and was covering the WR one on one instead of what he normally does and Collins undercut the pass and I believe he got a pick 6 with it.
UserPostedImage
go.pack.go.
14 years ago

What exactly is a "stunt" anyway? I see this word used all the time, but I've never been able to dig up an actual definition of the term.

"beast" wrote:



A stunt is when a play that is designed to move at least one guy out of his normal position or gap.

Say the defense is playing a 4-3 and the offense runs a pass play.

Normally the DT would attack the OG or OC and a DE would attack the OT.

On a stunt the DT might under cut the DE and go out and attack the OT while the DE goes around the DT and attacks the OG or OC. It's all about creating confusion for the offense with normally leads to the offense making a mistake.


Or like a CB normally covers a WR. But on a stunt last year against the Bears one of the Packers CBs (I think Williams) blitzed Cuter and Cutler saw it and tried to get it to what he thought was an open WR. Well other than Collins was also part of the stunt and was covering the WR one on one instead of what he normally does and Collins undercut the pass and I believe he got a pick 6 with it.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



This is correct. Great explanation.
UserPostedImage
Rockmolder
14 years ago

What happens when Chillar is rushing from the outside?

This!




Also how do you embed youtube videos on here?

"beast" wrote:



Interesting to see my own video with someone else's music, lol.

Anyway, [ youtube ] DZNF_dj6tLw [ /youtube ]

But then, obviously, without the spaces.

[youtube]5w9KF-hs5GA[/youtube]
beast
14 years ago

This is correct. Great explanation.

"go.pack.go." wrote:



Thanks :icon_smile:


What happens when Chillar is rushing from the outside?

This!




Also how do you embed youtube videos on here?

"Rockmolder" wrote:



Interesting to see my own video with someone else's music, lol.

Anyway, [ youtube ] DZNF_dj6tLw [ /youtube ]

But then, obviously, without the spaces.

[youtube]5w9KF-hs5GA[/youtube]

"beast" wrote:



Thank you :icon_smile: and I didn't make the video for the record. I just saw it and posted the link.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (44m) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (44m) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (44m) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (52m) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (53m) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (1h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (2h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (2h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (3h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (3h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (3h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (3h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (3h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (3h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (3h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (3h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (3h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (3h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (3h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (3h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (3h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (3h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (4h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (4h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (4h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (4h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
packerfanoutwest (4h) : falcons are already ahead of us
beast (4h) : Packers will get in
beast (4h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
packerfanoutwest (4h) : they still are in the playoffs
packerfanoutwest (4h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
Zero2Cool (6h) : We can say it. We don't play.
Mucky Tundra (7h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
Mucky Tundra (7h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
Mucky Tundra (7h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
buckeyepackfan (8h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
Mucky Tundra (17h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (17h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
bboystyle (17h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
buckeyepackfan (21h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks
Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.