Chillar at OLB· Page 2

Tezzy
Senior Member

14 years ago

I was sort of surprised he didn't get more of a look at OLB last year.

"earthquake" wrote:

I think last year it was important for Chillar to be prepared at ILB since it was an unknown how effective Barnett was going to be after coming back from the injury.

On top of every beard grows a man.
"The Bears are shell-shocked... and it's breaking my heart."

Dulak
Veteran Member

14 years ago

#12

I was sort of surprised he didn't get more of a look at OLB last year.

"Tezzy" wrote:

I think last year it was important for Chillar to be prepared at ILB since it was an unknown how effective Barnett was going to be after coming back from the injury.

"earthquake" wrote:

that and besides chillar was paid to be the best coverage ILB we had ... ya I know he got handed too in the viks game but that is what he was paid for ...

besides we had matthews and kampman to start ...

RajiRoar
Senior Member

14 years ago

#13

anyways, I think of the play in 08' againt Dallas where Chillar forced a fumble that shot into the air, sadly I believe TO caught it.

MintBaconDrivel
Dec, 11, 2012 - FOREVER!

beast
Select Member

14 years ago

#14

What happens when Chillar is rushing from the outside?

This!

Also how do you embed youtube videos on here?

nerdmann
Premier Member

14 years ago

#15

Jones is the starter. They're pissed because he was "injured" and not practicing. A helmet in the bank. Bruised labia.
I would still love to see Bishop outside. Maybe they don't think he can cover. He sure can get after the QB though.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

14 years ago

#16

What exactly is a "stunt" anyway? I see this word used all the time, but I've never been able to dig up an actual definition of the term.

beast
Select Member

14 years ago

#17

What exactly is a "stunt" anyway? I see this word used all the time, but I've never been able to dig up an actual definition of the term.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:

A stunt is when a play that is designed to move at least one guy out of his normal position or gap.

Say the defense is playing a 4-3 and the offense runs a pass play.

Normally the DT would attack the OG or OC and a DE would attack the OT.

On a stunt the DT might under cut the DE and go out and attack the OT while the DE goes around the DT and attacks the OG or OC. It's all about creating confusion for the offense with normally leads to the offense making a mistake.

Or like a CB normally covers a WR. But on a stunt last year against the Bears one of the Packers CBs (I think Williams) blitzed Cuter and Cutler saw it and tried to get it to what he thought was an open WR. Well other than Collins was also part of the stunt and was covering the WR one on one instead of what he normally does and Collins undercut the pass and I believe he got a pick 6 with it.

go.pack.go.
Veteran Member

14 years ago

#18

What exactly is a "stunt" anyway? I see this word used all the time, but I've never been able to dig up an actual definition of the term.

"beast" wrote:

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:

This is correct. Great explanation.

Rockmolder
Honored Member

14 years ago

#19

What happens when Chillar is rushing from the outside?

This!

Also how do you embed youtube videos on here?

"beast" wrote:

Interesting to see my own video with someone else's music, lol.

Anyway, [ youtube ] DZNF_dj6tLw [ /youtube ]

But then, obviously, without the spaces.

[youtube]5w9KF-hs5GA[/youtube]

beast
Select Member

14 years ago

#20

This is correct. Great explanation.

"go.pack.go." wrote:

Thanks :icon_smile:

What happens when Chillar is rushing from the outside?

This!

Also how do you embed youtube videos on here?

"Rockmolder" wrote:

Interesting to see my own video with someone else's music, lol.

Anyway, [ youtube ] DZNF_dj6tLw [ /youtube ]

But then, obviously, without the spaces.

[youtube]5w9KF-hs5GA[/youtube]

"beast" wrote:

Thank you :icon_smile: and I didn't make the video for the record. I just saw it and posted the link.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

packerfanoutwest (1h) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (1h) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (1h) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (3h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (3h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (3h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (3h) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (4h) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (4h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (4h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (4h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (5h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (5h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (5h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (5h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (5h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (6h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (6h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (6h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (6h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (7h) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (7h) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (7h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (7h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (7h) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (7h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (9h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (9h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (10h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (10h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (10h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (10h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (10h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (10h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (10h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (10h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (10h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (10h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (10h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (10h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (10h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (10h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (10h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (10h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (10h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (10h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (10h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (10h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (10h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (11h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS