all_about_da_packers
14 years ago

Our needs: OT, OLB, S, CB, KR.

WR just isn't one of them.

"millertime" wrote:




Let me ask you one question:

What do we do if Greg Jennings gets injured? Worst case scenario: Jennings is lost for the year. You are down a play-maker, and a key one at that. Jones and Jordy may be good, but they have yet to show they are in the same league as Jennings, play making wise..
The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.
all_about_da_packers
14 years ago

My fix on the O-line involves inserting Lang at LG, turning Colledge back into his real position of LT (lets not read too much into his perfomance against Jared Allen last year when he was playing on a a sprained ankle). Colledge wouldn't even play unless Clifton got hurt, and he's probably better than most of the second tier OT's this year anyway.

"DakotaT" wrote:



Dakota, I love this trade proposal because I think it's well thought out. But my problem with Colledge at LT is that, frankly, he has not shown anything that indicates he could be a long-term LT.

At G, he has had issues with leverage and hand placement. Bigger players (DTs) who aren't as quick as others (DEs) have been able to nock down Colledges hand and get penetration. They've been able to get under him and drive him back. Last year, he may have played on one ankle but his performance was frankly disturbingly bad.

There is not a whole lot to think those two problems will get solved when he is a LT. And if they don't, Aaron Rodgers is going to be a dead man walking.... I don't even want to imagine the number of sacks we could potentially give up.
The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.
all_about_da_packers
14 years ago

Now go tell Rock to stop talking silliness about getting rid of Jordy and Jones in trade for Marshall. :pottytrain2:

"dfosterf" wrote:




I think Rock's comment about giving up both James and Jordy was more to show how enthusiastic he is about adding Marshall to the team.

Frankly, this idea has me captured as well (although it is an idea, and not even a rumor [yet]).

Driver has a bit left in him. Jennings is terrific. If you add Marshall, you're adding a player that can break tackles not with speed or agility, but because of his sheer strength. Frankly, I'd rather give up Jones than Jordy becaue I think Jordy has a promising future.

Warren Sapp and Darren Sharper, on State of the Packers on NFL Total Access last week, said hands down the Packers have the best receiving core in the game. You add Marshall to Driver / Jennings / Finley.... this team, in my opinion, has special written all over it. You maintain 1st and 2nd round picks, and you can trade back your 1st to reacquire a third.

Now I'm pumped up... I wonder if Ted has even looked into adding Marshall.
The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.
Packers_Finland
14 years ago



What do we do if Greg Jennings gets injured? Worst case scenario: Jennings is lost for the year. You are down a play-maker, and a key one at that. Jones and Jordy may be good, but they have yet to show they are in the same league as Jennings, play making wise..

"all_about_da_packers" wrote:



What does any team do when their number one goes down? I'm thinking there are maybe 1-3 teams in the league that are as well equipped as us if our number one goes down. After all, we're talking about BACKUPS, and none of Jennings, Driver or Marshall are probably willing to accept that role.
This is a placeholder
DakotaT
  • DakotaT
  • Select Member Topic Starter
14 years ago

My fix on the O-line involves inserting Lang at LG, turning Colledge back into his real position of LT (lets not read too much into his perfomance against Jared Allen last year when he was playing on a a sprained ankle). Colledge wouldn't even play unless Clifton got hurt, and he's probably better than most of the second tier OT's this year anyway.

"all_about_da_packers" wrote:



Dakota, I love this trade proposal because I think it's well thought out.

"DakotaT" wrote:




I can't believe some little purple bastard isn't all over this statement like white on rice. I was always was better at chess than checkers. Thanks AADP.


I don't know if Colledge has it or not, but I know he can't handle the DT's in our division, and that's why I think Lang would really excel on the interior with Sitton, because he has the strength. Lang was an awesome pick last year, but we need him starting not playing super sub.

At 23 we aren't getting starting material at LT, so if we're settling for a project, why waste a first round pick.
UserPostedImage
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
14 years ago
What Foster said (several posts earlier).

IMO the only priority lower for this team than WR is getting a starting quarterback. Sorry, Dakota, the team should no more be spending serious attention to Brandon Marshall than it should be spending serious attention to Sam Bradford.

Some times I just want to stamp my feet and throw a tantrum. If Greg Jennings goes down, that's a major blow. But right now, if that happens, the team has two stud receiving threats (Driver, Finley), and two reasonably good ones (Jones, Nelson). On the other hand, the OL has one stud (Sitton), one up and comer who hasn't yet proven himself as a starter (Lang), a solid center (Wells), and....

A RT who is on the decline.
A LT who is even more on the decline.
And a bunch of guys.

I'd rather have to rely on Jones AND Nelson starting at WR than have to rely on Spitz, Colledge, et al to start.

And I'd definitely be content with Jones/Nelson fighting it out for #3 than have to depend on any current "depth" on the OL.

The only way Marshall should get a look is if, when Ted Thompson says "you'd be no higher than our #3", he said, "That's cool!"
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
all_about_da_packers
14 years ago

What does any team do when their number one goes down? I'm thinking there are maybe 1-3 teams in the league that are as well equipped as us if our number one goes down. After all, we're talking about BACKUPS, and none of Jennings, Driver or Marshall are probably willing to accept that role.

"Packers_Finland" wrote:




You know, the first part of the reply is pretty bad. Yeah, many teams are in trouble if their top play maker goes down. So for that reason we shouldn't address that concern?

My point was, there is no such thing as too many play-makers. The Packers can sure up their depth with a play-maker like Marshall.

As for none of them wanting to be back-ups... you do realize we often start out with 3-WR sets, right? That means the 3 WRs are credited with getting a start. From a purely statistical point of view, that fills their need to "start" on paper.

But really, you're telling me a player like Driver would say "Uh, no I want out" because he can no longer be #1 on the depth chart? Really?

Look at the dynamics of our three receiver set. Driver and Jennings (& sometimes Finley) occupy the inside receiver positions because of their speed and quickness. Marshall is different, he has the strength to be put on the outside and still get separation because it his hard to press him. He runs nice routes, so he can get separation in short areas.

Marshall adds a unique dynamic to our receiving core, and frankly his skill set IMO complements Driver and Jennings - especially in 3 WR sets.

Yeah, there is only one football to go around, but you know the vast majority of the players will shut-up and play when they see they are part of a team that wins.

Also, Marshall said flat out that he longed for a fresh start somewhere else, because he was haunted by the death of his teammate a couple of years ago. I'm willing to say that a fresh start, even as not the primary option, will be okay for Marshall. Especially if you show him the money.
The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.
Packers_Finland
14 years ago

What does any team do when their number one goes down? I'm thinking there are maybe 1-3 teams in the league that are as well equipped as us if our number one goes down. After all, we're talking about BACKUPS, and none of Jennings, Driver or Marshall are probably willing to accept that role.

"Packers_Finland" wrote:




You know, the first part of the reply is pretty bad. Yeah, many teams are in trouble if their top play maker goes down. So for that reason we shouldn't address that concern?

"all_about_da_packers" wrote:



Maybe we should address the concern that we have one of the worst offensive lines in the league, and a secondary that gives up 50+ points in the playoffs? If we added Marshall to our team, we're just wasting talent. Our team may be better, but with the same price as Marshall comes, I'm pretty darn sure we can improve other positions so that it makes a much bigger difference.

As for none of them wanting to be back-ups... you do realize we often start out with 3-WR sets, right? That means the 3 WRs are credited with getting a start. From a purely statistical point of view, that fills their need to "start" on paper.

"all_about_da_packers" wrote:



I realize your point. But with 3 of them and Finley, there's no way one of them's not gonna be pissed off with the lack of balls they are receiving. Plus, Jones and Nelson, who have done nothing to show that they won't be great (quite to the contrary, they've done really well as #3s and #4s go). We'd have 5 great wide receivers, but at the same time our offense is being killed by sacks and penalites. We need to fix the OL. We don't need another WR.

But really, you're telling me a player like Driver would say "Uh, no I want out" because he can no longer be #1 on the depth chart? Really?

"all_about_da_packers" wrote:



Read my earlier post. I wouldn't say Driver would do that, but I find it disrespectful to reduce a guys playing time, despite having multiple 1000+ yard seasons in a row and hasn't shown many signs of slowing down just because his age, which is just a number, is getting up.

I've omitted a few parts from your post, but that's only because most of it is true. However I've never argumented against said sections, so I will also not reply to them.
This is a placeholder
isocleas2
14 years ago
I like that our WRs are humble and generally great teammates. Keep those prima-donas like Marshall out of here.

About the only way I'd be on board with this trade is if
A.) the coaching staff has lost confidence in either Jordy or Jones and Denver would take that WR in a trade with a later pick.
B.) Driver or Marshall were ok with being #3 on the depth chart
C.) The coaching staff actually thought Marshall could be salvaged and wasn't destined for TO or Moss levels of doucheness
Dulak
14 years ago
I just dont see us spending the dough on this guy - IMO hes pretty good but would demand a good salary.

whose our gm again ... ya thats right ...

ya we aint getting him plain and simple
Fan Shout
beast (36m) : Eagles sure get a lot of fumbles on kickoffs
Mucky Tundra (41m) : This game looks too big for Washington
packerfanoutwest (4h) : that being said, The Ravens are the Browns
packerfanoutwest (4h) : Browns, Dolphins have longest AFC Championship droughts
packerfanoutwest (4h) : As of today, Cowboys have longest NFC Championship drought,
beast (14h) : Someone pointed out, with Raiders hiring Carroll, the division games between Carroll and Jim Harbaugh are back on (who can whine more games)
beast (20h) : I'm confused, Pete Carroll and Brian Schottenheimer? When Todd Monken, Joe Brady, Kellen Moore, Kliff Kingsbury and Zac Robinson are availab
Zero2Cool (22h) : Any reason I'm catching a shot here about my intelligence?
Martha Careful (25-Jan) : thank you Mucky for sticking up for me
Martha Careful (25-Jan) : some of those people are smarter than you zero. However Pete Carroll is not
Mucky Tundra (24-Jan) : Rude!
beast (24-Jan) : Martha? 😋
Zero2Cool (24-Jan) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.
dfosterf (24-Jan) : I'm going with a combination of the two.
beast (24-Jan) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / hardrocker950

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

25-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.