Cheesey
15 years ago
Non....you (and I) must be in the minority then. Otherwise there wouldn't be so many abortions or people with STD's.
And yes.....men are "horndogs". Just look at Tiger Woods. PERFECT example of a man who did what he wanted with who he wanted when he wanted.
Then crys when he got caught.
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
15 years ago
I don't think we're in the minority, frankly. I think a lot of male horndoggery is really just talk. I've talked to too many women who complain that their men turn them down more than they accept them. Of course, this is a few years into the relationship, not early on.

Believe me, Alan, while I will defend to the end the right to choose one's sexual lifestyle, I do not in any way promote promiscuity. I've personally wanted, for a very long time, to have a couple of steady, devoted relationships in my life, and I'm blessed to have found that. This has been one of the happiest periods of my life. But I also know full well my lifestyle is a fringe choice; it certainly isn't for everyone, and I make no attempt to push it on or even recommend it to others. I just ask that they respect my choice even as I respect them for theirs and marvel at the diversity of human desires that exist in this world.

I admire you monogamists -- those of you who choose it not because it's conventional, but because it's what you genuinely want for yourselves. Sometimes I wish I were one of you.
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
15 years ago

Sometimes I wish I were one of you.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



It is a choice.. just like any other. Personally speaking.. I couldn't live another way.

Not that at times there aren't temptations.. or some lust... but it is a choice.. a way of life to commit, learn and remaining intimate with your single mate.

And personally.. it shows a deepened amount of bond to commit to them alone.

But that is my choice.. my belief.. and each other person has the right to theirs.

Where I think it varies is I don't feel the need to embellish my commitment past I am married... where I think other types of relationships people feel the need to vocalize the situation repeatedly.. then they wonder why they are at times are challenged for their beliefs or actions.

But again.. that is my opinion.. and definitely is not correct because it is mine..

The other thing that I believe is no matter how much "open" relationship couples deny it.. but there are underlying emotions that are repressed verbally of jealousy or hurt.. and sooner or later they will emerge and will need ot be addressed. But that might be my own bias being applied.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
zombieslayer
15 years ago
Pack - No. It's not your own bias. I think the polygamy mindset is a small minority and only a handful of people can pull it off.

Now keep in mind, I'm all for the right to do anything. If Nonstop can pull it off, I'd applaud him.

I used to love listening to Tom Lycus on my daily commute home. He's kind of similar to me when it comes to sex. He's all for men to get as much tail as possible, then find the best of the best and marry that person, then become completely monogamous. Get it out of your system before you get married, but after you're married, open relationships only lead to hurt.

I believe that. Just from experience, it's been so rare to see a couple that can survive an outside relationship whether they know about it (and approve it) or not.

It's most likely cultural though. In Italy, it's understood that if you are a woman and your husband is rich and powerful, he will have a mistress. Who could say no to a drop dead gorgeous young Italian woman? Now, the wife would be PISSED if she were ugly because if she were ugly, he obviously loves her.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Cheesey
15 years ago
That brings up ANOTHER problem. What Zombie just wrote, my wife brought up to me last night. And what she said is true.
Guys want to screw around.......but when they are looking for a wife, who do they usually choose? Not the "sluts" that sleep around. They want the sweet virgin, not the whore.
Using other humans to please yourself and then throwing them aside. That's another mindset of today's world.
And many women "give in" to men because they are looking for love, and think the guy will leave if they don't "put out". And they end up mentally destroyed.
Guys can screw around, and not feel any shame or responsibility to the girl. Most women can't do that.
UserPostedImage
TheEngineer
15 years ago
The entire concept of child support is flawed, in my opinion. The notion that one is willing to raise a child without the necessary finances already in place should not be having children in the first place.
blank
zombieslayer
15 years ago

The entire concept of child support is flawed, in my opinion. The notion that one is willing to raise a child without the necessary finances already in place should not be having children in the first place.

"TheEngineer" wrote:



This is a good point you bring up. I've always said if you can't afford kids, don't have them. Then some PC jerk gets butt hurt and says that I'm saying poor people shouldn't have kids.

Well, sort of I am. I'm saying that wait until you're not poor to have kids. You'd think it would be common sense. You'd think.

Cheesey - Depends on the person. I wouldn't marry a virgin. Virgins are too much work. I actually don't even like them.

But that's just me. While probably the majority of guys want a cute, innocent 18-year old virgin, I'd prefer a 30-year-old who speaks 4 languages, has a college degree, has been to at least 2 continents and has a 130+ IQ (and red hair).
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Nonstopdrivel
15 years ago
Cheesey, your last post comes across as so unbelievably sexist. On the one hand you misogynistically argue for the inferiority of women, while on the other, you spew the anti-male feminist/fundamentalist vision of human sexuality as somehow predatory and exploitative in nature. The women who hurl these accusations aren't happy, well-adjusted people -- why are you defending their warped beliefs? I'd prefer to listen to the perspectives of people such as my wife, who actually like and even adore men as people -- and enjoy sex to boot.

As for this:

While probably the majority of guys want a cute, innocent 18-year old virgin, I'd prefer a 30-year-old who speaks 4 languages, has a college degree, has been to at least 2 continents and has a 130+ IQ (and red hair).

"zombieslayer" wrote:



Wow . . . +1. Virgins are too much work and they're lousy in bed. Actually, most young women seem to be bad in bed. They seem to get much more fun around their mid-20s.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
15 years ago

The entire concept of child support is flawed, in my opinion. The notion that one is willing to raise a child without the necessary finances already in place should not be having children in the first place.

"zombieslayer" wrote:



This is a good point you bring up. I've always said if you can't afford kids, don't have them. Then some PC jerk gets butt hurt and says that I'm saying poor people shouldn't have kids.

Well, sort of I am. I'm saying that wait until you're not poor to have kids. You'd think it would be common sense. You'd think.

Cheesey - Depends on the person. I wouldn't marry a virgin. Virgins are too much work. I actually don't even like them.

But that's just me. While probably the majority of guys want a cute, innocent 18-year old virgin, I'd prefer a 30-year-old who speaks 4 languages, has a college degree, has been to at least 2 continents and has a 130+ IQ (and red hair).

"TheEngineer" wrote:



The point TheEngineer made is one I've said about both of my biological daughters.

When in court last summer some of my argument was, if shes living with me for primary placement, she gets to socialize with someone her age, her sister, resident stability, there would be no money from the state required nor money from the mother. I can handle it all on my own with no BadgerCare or anything of that nature. Completely 100% out of my own pocket.

They said, no. You pay more than the cost of rent plus all medical, dental and vision and oh you get to see her every other weekend.

My statement to them was ... if the mother can't provide adequately for our child, then she shouldn't be raising the child. Why would I want my daughter living with a woman who can't make financially sound decisions well enough to provide for herself and offspring? Wouldn't the child be better off living with the parent who has done such things? Does that not set a better example?

No, let's just let mothers badmouth fathers as they fight and fight to be in their kids life while spending their money to go on their second god damn vacation in six months wile the child misses a full week of school ... oh yea the child did NOT go on vacation with the mother. Yeah, that's GREAT parenting and GREAT use of child support for a unemployed mother.

I swear the mothers of this world, some of them, they prey on the notion that men are dead beat fathers. Here's a secret, many fathers RUN because the god damn system makes it impossible for them to be in their kids lives even if they want to!

I'm not the best father, but I'm sure as hell not the worst and I deserve a lot more than every other damn weekend with my daughter.

Wait, that's right. Because I shoved my cock in her pussy this is the hand I'm supposed to be dealt with... Right? Forget that uneducated ignorant theory.

It takes TWO to make a baby, it takes TWO to raise one. And in the damn eye of the state (Wisconsin anyhow) it goes like this.

Mommy - child resides with.
Daddy - pays all the bills.


This is not the freaking 20's and 30's anymore where the wife stays at home raising the kids while the husband brings home the bacon. FATHERS CAN RAISE KIDS JUST AS WELL AS ANY MOTHER!

Women want rights, you got your damn rights. When the hell will us Fathers get OUR rights to help raise OUR kids instead of being a god damn paycheck!
UserPostedImage
4PackGirl
15 years ago
ok - as a mother of 2 little boys who receives child support, i'll give you my 2 cents worth on this subject.

my ex has screwed up his life so badly it's ridiculous. when i decided to have children with him, he had been sober for close to 8 years, owned his own semi, & was a productive member of society.

when i told him i wanted a divorce, the 1st words that came out of his mouth were "oh great - now i hafta fuckin pay child support for 14 fuckin years". then he proceeded to say "i know alotta guys who just work shit jobs so the child support is lower."

my take on this is - if we were STILL together, he'd be responsible for half of their upbringing, correct? so why if we're apart shouldn't he continue to be responsible for them?

i do NOT take vacations galore & spend the child support money on anything except our boys. he agreed to pay half of their medical/vision/dental costs but has yet to pay for ANY of it. yet he can go out & get attorney's galore to fight his 2 - yes i said 2 - dui's he got in a 4 month time span, pay $2500 in fines to the state but chooses NOT to help support his own flesh & blood.

2 people make babies & 2 people should be held equally responsible for the cost & care of raising said babies. now my new husband is truly raising the boys, paying for the vast majority of their needs, & my ex sees nothing wrong with that at all.

does that sound fair to any of you? this idiot went from making $2,000/week trucking to now maybe $400/wk changing oil. but now my kids have to suffer for his indescretions?? how is that right in ANY of your minds?? oh & he moved in with his parents, pays nothing to live there, declared bankruptcy, & has NO bills whatsoever. yet he still feels no need to support his children - and i don't just mean financially - he chooses to be on the fringe of their lives.

i think what men need to understand is they are NOT hurting the women - they are hurting the children. maybe if they'd take a step back & really think about it, they'd understand that. yes it of course hurts me emotionally but financially - i'm just fine. i couldn't care less if i ever get another dime from him but when he flat out agreed to do these things for the boys & he doesn't do it, it's just infuriating!!!

and then it's boo hoo poor me - she's a rich bitch & her rich family should pay for the boys - it's not my fault i'm a drunk - everybody feel sorry for me!!!

sorry - sore subject for me.
Fan Shout
dfosterf (5h) : 50 cent hookers? I'm moving to Green Bay. I thought it was just real estate that was more affordable there. 😂
Zero2Cool (6h) : Sure seems site going down more than 50¢ hooker
Mucky Tundra (27-Jul) : Golden with two TDs in red zone drills today
Mucky Tundra (27-Jul) : @JacobMorley Shoutout to Quinn Ewers for allowing Matthew Golden to be available when Green Bay picked.
Zero2Cool (27-Jul) : The menu you expanded to log in, it's the first icon under "PackersHome" .. maybe i should add text to it
dfosterf (27-Jul) : Feelin' pfowish can't find the sun. No big deal, will drag a laptop out when the time comes
Zero2Cool (27-Jul) : if you're on mobile, open the menu and its the "sun" icon
dfosterf (27-Jul) : Can't find the toggle, lol
dfosterf (27-Jul) : I can find that the Microsoft lady rep for Titletown Tech is the philanthropy boss for the entire Microsoft corporation, but. .
Zero2Cool (27-Jul) : There's a toggle for light/dark theme. Super easy.
dfosterf (27-Jul) : The white background beta was hard to read, especially the quotes
dfosterf (27-Jul) : Hopefully the color scheme remains the same
dfosterf (27-Jul) : *Friday*
dfosterf (27-Jul) : 100 million would be 539 million as of Fridsy
dfosterf (27-Jul) : Heck, they could have taken a hundred milliion and invested in DAVE inc. last year (semi random, humor, but real)
dfosterf (27-Jul) : Beer brat and ticket is where the money comes from
dfosterf (27-Jul) : The 40th is Titletown Tech itself. This is a pet project of both Ed Policy and Mark Murphy
Zero2Cool (27-Jul) : New site coming along nicely. The editor is better than what we have here. Oh yeah!
dfosterf (27-Jul) : No profit that I know of. 0 for 40
dfosterf (27-Jul) : The woke reference has to do with the makeup and oftentimes objectives of the companies they invested in
packerfanoutwest (27-Jul) : beer and brats woke? say whom?
beast (27-Jul) : I don't want to get into politics, but how is, beers and brats considered to be "woke"? Food is food...
beast (27-Jul) : That being said, I'm not saying all 100% should be that way, but not surprised if majority are Wisconsin based
beast (27-Jul) : And if everyone has heard of them, then it it probably has less growth potential and less community based
beast (27-Jul) : Well isn't the investing person supposed to invest the money?
dfosterf (27-Jul) : I swear if I were to discover that one of them has invented a virtue signalling transmitter I will not be surprised, lol
dfosterf (27-Jul) : 39 companies so far that I bet no one has ever heard of.
dfosterf (27-Jul) : -Not saying woke, but should- borderline philanthopist venture capital excercise
dfosterf (27-Jul) : Well for one, they are pouring resources into Title Town Tech. Investing beer, brat, hot dog, ticket money into what is pretty much...
beast (27-Jul) : Wow, 95% drop in investment revenue? Would be interesting to hear the details of why...
dfosterf (25-Jul) : It's my one day deal complaint dept. on shareholder meeting day
dfosterf (25-Jul) : Probably a homer access credential intimidation kinda thing
dfosterf (25-Jul) : Meathead "journalists" skip this, concentrating on operational revenue when convenient. They switch when net revenue is more favorable.
dfosterf (25-Jul) : Resulting in an actual drop of net revenue of 12.5%. She is from Minnesota. Just sayin'
dfosterf (25-Jul) : Any plans to hold Maureen Smith (CFO) accountable for a 95% drop in investment revenue?
Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : In your face, HBO!
Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : @ByRyanWood Mark Murphy: “A great source of pride of mine is that we were never on Hard Knocks.”
Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : *years
Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : @mattschneidman Mark Murphy says he anticipates “many Packers games” being played in Germany, Ireland and/or the U.K. over the next 5-10 yea
dfosterf (25-Jul) : *cafeteria* I have hit my head also, so I sympathize
dfosterf (25-Jul) : Possibly hit his head leaning into the glass protecting the food in the cafateria
dfosterf (25-Jul) : Maybe a low flying drone
dfosterf (25-Jul) : Did Savion Williams run into a goalpost or something?
Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : also, no bueno when a guy starts getting concussions right off the bat in his career
Zero2Cool (25-Jul) : Concussion is worse. Banks probably vet off day via back booboo claim
Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : @AndyHermanNFL Jordy Nelson out at camp today. No word if he’s in play for one of the two open roster spots ; )
dfosterf (25-Jul) : Is that better or worse than Banks bad back?
Zero2Cool (25-Jul) : Savion concussion ... not good.
packerfanoutwest (24-Jul) : Aaron Rodgers’s first pass of first team period was picked off
Mucky Tundra (24-Jul) : tbh I didn't hear of his passing
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
21h / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Jul / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

27-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Jul / Around The NFL / Mucky Tundra

25-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

25-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

25-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

25-Jul / Around The NFL / beast

24-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

24-Jul / Around The NFL / beast

24-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.