Zero2Cool
15 years ago

Nonstop, where did you get those numbers from? 😛


lol

"RaiderPride" wrote:



He got them from NFL Stats.... It is right there.

Now he did not mention that SeaBass ( Janakowski Oakland) and Kris Brown (Houston) were both 2 for 2 and 100% from beyond the 50.

(Nonstop took a number of Attemps of 5 or more over 50 yrds.)

Which is a fair number to draw a conparison from.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



:facepalm:


Check out the first article, Special Teams on the front page 😛
UserPostedImage
RaiderPride
15 years ago

Nonstop, where did you get those numbers from? 😛


lol

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



He got them from NFL Stats.... It is right there.

Now he did not mention that SeaBass ( Janakowski Oakland) and Kris Brown (Houston) were both 2 for 2 and 100% from beyond the 50.

(Nonstop took a number of Attemps of 5 or more over 50 yrds.)

Which is a fair number to draw a conparison from.

"RaiderPride" wrote:



:facepalm:


Check out the first article, Special Teams on the front page :P

"Zero2Cool" wrote:




Facepalm?

What does that mean exactly?

I am so sorry... I am not up on those little face thing meanings on the internet.

I am serious? what does a facepalm mean?
""People Will Probably Never Remember What You Said, And May Never Remember What You Did. However, People Will Always Remember How You Made Them Feel."
Formo
15 years ago

Nonstop, where did you get those numbers from? 😛


lol

"RaiderPride" wrote:



He got them from NFL Stats.... It is right there.

Now he did not mention that SeaBass ( Janakowski Oakland) and Kris Brown (Houston) were both 2 for 2 and 100% from beyond the 50.

(Nonstop took a number of Attemps of 5 or more over 50 yrds.)

Which is a fair number to draw a conparison from.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



:facepalm:


Check out the first article, Special Teams on the front page :P

"RaiderPride" wrote:




Facepalm?

What does that mean exactly?

I am so sorry... I am not up on those little face thing meanings on the internet.

I am serious? what does a facepalm mean?

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



Doing this:
UserPostedImage
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
nerdmann
15 years ago
Paying off some gambling debts.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Rockmolder
15 years ago

Three NFL kickers have attempted 5 or more field goals from 50 yards or more. They are Josh Scobee (2-6), Ryan Succop (2-5), and Mason Crosby (1-5). What exactly are you complaining about?

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



You're putting him in some great company there, lol.

Josh Scobee is 50% on long field goals in his career. He's just having a horrible down year right now. He kicked for 92% in 2007. He's kicking for 62.5% this year.

Succop is a rookie. A pretty good one at that, but even kickers usually have an adjustment period with the rush coming so much faster, the wind and what not. That said, the kid has been pretty good from short range. Not that great from far. But he doesn't have the leg strength Crosby has. Although he doesn't have a weak leg, either.

It's kind off like saying that Rodgers is a good QB because he plays as well as Eli Manning or Shaun Hill.

Like Raiderpride said, two kickers are 2/2. You didn't use them, as you only went for guys with 5 attempts or more, but still, even in that list Crosby has been the worsed of the 3.

That said, he has been kicking in some tough places. It's just that you'd like to see him hit those 50 yarders if he has the leg strength to kick 65'ers.

And next to that, the kick-offs haven't been that great either, so far.

And that noodle-leg Longwell was 4/5 and 3/5 when he attempted 5 or more 50 yarders.
dhazer
15 years ago
just was thinking about something, didn't they try changing Crosby's kicking style in the offseason? Also heres a question what is so special to remember about Succop?




































answer is he was Mr. Irrelevant in the draft this year 😛 remember that for trivia.
Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)
UserPostedImage
Stevetarded
15 years ago
As long as he keeps making the FGs inside of 50 yards consistently I'm fine. With his leg strength we at least have a shot at a long 50+ yard FG in crappy weather if we needed one.
blank
Zero2Cool
15 years ago

just was thinking about something, didn't they try changing Crosby's kicking style in the offseason? Also heres a question what is so special to remember about Succop?

answer is he was Mr. Irrelevant in the draft this year 😛 remember that for trivia.

"dhazer" wrote:



I'm not sure, but I do know he was fond of how Jon Ryan held the ball. I remember that being an issue and many people overlook that, which is a mistake.
UserPostedImage
15 years ago
You also have to look at how long his field goal misses were. He missed a 49, 55, 55, 51, 52. He has a career long of 53 yards. So he has 2 attempts outside of his career long.
UserPostedImage
15 years ago
I don't know where his kicks are, but Lambeau seems like an extremely hard place to kick lately. Folk missed that one last week. It seems like people are always missing kicks in GB. I don't have the numbers to back up my theory though.
UserPostedImage
Similar Topics
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    Zero2Cool (4h) : Could ban beast and I still don't think anyone catches him.
    Mucky Tundra (18h) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore
    packerfanoutwest (23h) : Feliz Navidad!
    Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!
    beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
    beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
    packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
    Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
    Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
    buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
    buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
    Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
    Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
    packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
    packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
    packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
    bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
    bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
    bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
    Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
    beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
    beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
    bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
    Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
    beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
    packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
    Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
    Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
    beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
    packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
    beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
    beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
    beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
    Vikings
    Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
    BEARS
    Recent Topics
    41m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    25-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

    25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    25-Dec / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

    24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    24-Dec / Random Babble / beast

    24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

    19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.