wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
15 years ago

Let's drop whether a power ranking is meaningful or not, please? That's so old and boring. We know they mean nothing, so why rehash it?

I think they are neat to observe, not dwell upon them. I hope no one is punching a wall because the Bears were ranked higher than us. ;)

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



Sigh, I am surrry Dad. I will go stand in the time out corner for ??? ten minutes??
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
15 years ago

Let's drop whether a power ranking is meaningful or not, please? That's so old and boring. We know they mean nothing, so why rehash it?

I think they are neat to observe, not dwell upon them. I hope no one is punching a wall because the Bears were ranked higher than us. ;)

"wpr" wrote:



Sigh, I am surrry Dad. I will go stand in the time out corner for ??? ten minutes??

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

lol hey now ... jus saying we could lighten up a bit and use it for a topic of discussion, not ridicule its validity. I mean, no one has won or lost the Super Bowl based on their Power Ranking, right? So, why hash out how irrelevant it is to what happens on the field?

I say we bash the people who put us where they did instead. 😛 j/k ...



I just find it interesting to see where the 'media' has us and I like following it to see how we go up/down through the season.
UserPostedImage
Yerko
15 years ago
Always interesting to see the first power ranking of the year. I will certainly settle with them putting the Packers at 12. That 3-4 defense will slowly move our ranking up!
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
15 years ago


lol hey now ... jus saying we could lighten up a bit and use it for a topic of discussion, not ridicule its validity.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:


Zero I was just being a smart @ss. I was being light. You were right. Nop point in bashing the power rankings.



I just find it interesting to see where the 'media' has us and I like following it to see how we go up/down through the season.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



Agreed.

(Are my 10 min up yet?)
UserPostedImage
gbguy20
15 years ago
by week 1 the bears will drop below us if u know what i mean
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
Greg C.
15 years ago
I think the Vikes would've been ranked about the same even without Favre. A lot of people saw them as a team that was ready to take the next step because of their defense and running game, and they DID win the division last year.

I love power rankings BECAUSE they don't mean anything. In college football, they mean everything, and that stinks. But as NFL fans, we can just have fun with them.

EDIT: This just in: Don Banks of Sports Illustrated has the Packers at #3:

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/writers/don_banks/09/09/pre.regular.season/index.html?eref=T1 
blank
gbguy20
15 years ago

I think the Vikes would've been ranked about the same even without Favre. A lot of people saw them as a team that was ready to take the next step because of their defense and running game, and they DID win the division last year.

I love power rankings BECAUSE they don't mean anything. In college football, they mean everything, and that stinks. But as NFL fans, we can just have fun with them.

EDIT: This just in: Don Banks of Sports Illustrated has the Packers at #3:

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/writers/don_banks/09/09/pre.regular.season/index.html?eref=T1 

"Greg C." wrote:



damnnn
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
doddpower
15 years ago

Let's drop whether a power ranking is meaningful or not, please? That's so old and boring. We know they mean nothing, so why rehash it?

I think they are neat to observe, not dwell upon them. I hope no one is punching a wall because the Bears were ranked higher than us. ;)

"Zero2Cool" wrote:




I agree. Lighten up people, geeez. I don't need anyone (as I'm sure no one else does either) to tell me that power rankings don't mean anything. NO WAY REALLY????!! They are still something interesting to look at and burn some time on while at work. Not much time, but still, better then nothing. Obviously our games are going to be won and loss on the field, but that doesn't mean that certain things aren't worth discussing.

But yeah, I don't think the Vikings, Bears, and Packers should all be in the top 12. I think the Bears are over rated to this point. We may be as well, but I just think that we have a better chance to live up to the press. I'll give the Vikings the credit they deserve, but I still think we're going to win the division!
doddpower
15 years ago

I think the Vikes would've been ranked about the same even without Favre. A lot of people saw them as a team that was ready to take the next step because of their defense and running game, and they DID win the division last year.

I love power rankings BECAUSE they don't mean anything. In college football, they mean everything, and that stinks. But as NFL fans, we can just have fun with them.

EDIT: This just in: Don Banks of Sports Illustrated has the Packers at #3:

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/writers/don_banks/09/09/pre.regular.season/index.html?eref=T1 

"Greg C." wrote:



Holy shit!! 3???

I'm going to go ahead and say over rated there. I can buy the 12 at this point, but not 3. We will have to actually win some games before we deserve that spot.
Yerko
15 years ago
I hate to say this, but I like Don Banks opinion better than the first one posted. And no, not just because he has the Pack @ 3 but he has good rationale to each ranking. Just my opinion though.

And yes Don Banks, preseason means jack nothing.
UserPostedImage
Similar Topics
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    Martha Careful (1h) : Favored Illinois Bishop?
    beast (14h) : Technically, the I in FIB stands for Italian now, Si?
    dfosterf (17h) : I never thought I'd live long enough to call a pope a FIB, but here we are
    Martha Careful (18h) : Chicago produces a pope before it produces a 4000 yard passing quarterback
    wpr (19h) : HAHAHA Mucky Comment of the day.
    Mucky Tundra (19h) : According to reports, Mel Kiper is furious that Sanders wasn't selected as the new Pope
    Zero2Cool (21h) : Time taken to get picked:
    Zero2Cool (21h) : New Pope: 2 days | Shedeur Sanders: 3 days
    Zero2Cool (22h) : Collin Whitchurch @cowhitchurch · 1h Chicago got a pope before it got a QB to throw for 4,000 yards in a season.
    Mucky Tundra (22h) : New Pope from Chicago; in other words, the city produced a Pope before a 4000 yard passer
    beast (7-May) : My first name starts with R and my beer belly is quite voluptuous! Thank you for noticing 😏
    Zero2Cool (7-May) : beast, you're just one R from being voluptuous.
    Zero2Cool (7-May) : And now some Packers blogger is like Doubs to Steelers makes sense!!!!
    Zero2Cool (7-May) : You saw me Tweet???
    beast (7-May) : Supposedly Steelers will be trading WR George Pickens to the Cowboys for a 3rd and late round pick swap
    Zero2Cool (5-May) : Ravens release Justin Tucker, err D. Watson Jr?
    Zero2Cool (5-May) : Cardinals have signed TE Josiah Deguara.
    Zero2Cool (5-May) : If I were to "Google" it, then I wouldn't read it in your words.
    Martha Careful (5-May) : Yes, in the military S2’s work on IPB, PERCEC, PHYSEC and IO
    dfosterf (4-May) : FYI civilian companies swipe the S2 designation from the military. S2 is the intelligence branch up to brigade level. G2 is division level.
    dfosterf (4-May) : Google it. Make sure to tack NFL on it or you will get the military meaning
    Zero2Cool (4-May) : S2?
    beast (4-May) : Seems like the S2 has a love/hate relationship with professional scouts.
    beast (4-May) : In theory, the S2 test how quickly a QBs brain can solve game like issues and how quickly they can do it.
    dfosterf (4-May) : Are you gentlemen and at least one lady familiar with the S2 cognition
    Zero2Cool (4-May) : Maybe there isn't an issue.
    beast (4-May) : NFL really needs to fix their position labeling issue, but I don't think they care
    Zero2Cool (1-May) : Packers did not activate the fifth-year options for linebacker Quay Walker, with the goal of signing him to a contract extension.
    Zero2Cool (1-May) : Matthew Golden spoke with Randall Cobb before draft. Looked like chance encounter.
    packerfanoutwest (1-May) : from a head left turn?
    packerfanoutwest (1-May) : someone drunk?
    Zero2Cool (1-May) : Unlikely.
    dfosterf (30-Apr) : How long until Jeff Sperbeck's family sues John Elway ?
    Zero2Cool (30-Apr) : Packers are exercising the fifth-year option on DT Devonte Wyatt, locking in a guaranteed $12.9M for the 2026 season.
    beast (30-Apr) : Sounds like P Luke Elzinga has a rookie try out opportunity from the Titans
    dfosterf (30-Apr) : Luke Elzinga Punter Oklahoma stil unsigned. Green Bay has been mentioned as good fit
    beast (30-Apr) : The Packers re-signed three exclusive rights free agents WR Melton, P Whelan and RB Wilson.
    Zero2Cool (29-Apr) : February 5, 2002 (age 23) ok no. packers.com is wrong
    Zero2Cool (29-Apr) : Micah Robinson is only 19??
    Zero2Cool (29-Apr) : 6 first rounders on Packers defense now
    Zero2Cool (29-Apr) : LB Isaiah Simmons. Signed. Called it!!! Oh yeah!
    Martha Careful (29-Apr) : ty bboystyle...fat fingers
    bboystyle (29-Apr) : Tom*
    Martha Careful (28-Apr) : RIP Packer Safety Tim Brown
    beast (27-Apr) : Yeah, but also some of the wording suggestions Jax only pranked called the QB, not the others... and if he had an open spreadsheet & 3 calls
    beast (27-Apr) : Thank goodness he's not leaving the Turtle in the Red Tide
    Mucky Tundra (27-Apr) : Cowboys 1st round pick Tyler Booker will indeed be bringing his pet turtle to Dallas with him
    Mucky Tundra (27-Apr) : that contained all prospects info and contact
    Mucky Tundra (27-Apr) : beast, according the Falcons statement Jax came across it on an ipad. If I had to guess, probably an open spread sheet or something
    Zero2Cool (27-Apr) : Simmons put up an emoji with cheese.
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    29 - 34
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    16 - 10
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    30 - 14
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    29 - 31
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    24 - 19
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    34 - 13
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    24 - 22
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    30 - 27
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    14 - 24
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    20 - 19
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    38 - 10
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    30 - 17
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    31 - 34
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    30 - 13
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    34 - 0
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
    Vikings
    25 - 27
    Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    22 - 24
    Recent Topics
    1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    19h / Green Bay Packers Talk / greengold

    22h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    6-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    6-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    6-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    6-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    6-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    5-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    5-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    5-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    4-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    3-May / Packers Draft Threads / Martha Careful

    3-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.