beerme1974
15 years ago
Looking to see how the D will match up with a better receiving corp. I don't think he will, but interested if Brohm will perform better than previous.

I'd like to see the starters get challenged a bit more. Things have looked solid on both sides the ball for the most part in the one game I've seen, which is fine, but it would be healthy to see some challenges without of course injuries. I guess I'm just wondering if they are really this good or have the teams they played just been lesser and not approaching the games with the same level of effort.
blank
tonyagnese
15 years ago

Looking to see how the D will match up with a better receiving corp. I don't think he will, but interested if Brohm will perform better than previous.

I'd like to see the starters get challenged a bit more. Things have looked solid on both sides the ball for the most part in the one game I've seen, which is fine, but it would be healthy to see some challenges without of course injuries. I guess I'm just wondering if they are really this good or have the teams they played just been lesser and not approaching the games with the same level of effort.

"beerme1974" wrote:



I think that it is a combination of both. The Bills and Browns are both bad football teams (especially the Bills without TO) but the Packers have also played very well. Tonight will be MORE of a test, as the Cardinals have a decent team but I personally don't think they're all that great either. I'm looking to see how Sutton does against better players and I'm also looking to see if the defense continues to play well against a better offensive team.
blank
JD
  • JD
  • Registered
15 years ago
Hey guys,

I am new to the site. I would like to see another shut out. I think it will be a great confidence boost for the defense. I also want to see more bombs from Rodgers, his accuracy is getting pretty amazing.

J.D.
- J.D.
beast
15 years ago
I want to see how the 3-4 does with the passing game of the Cards.

Also I want to Sutton and how well he does. Could the Packers cut Lumpkin and Wynn/Jackson? (I think Jackson is safe but some others don't.)

Also I want to see more of the OLBs... I want to see Kampman in coverage... and just see how the rest are doing... Brad Jones looked like he could become something every good.

Also more of CB Lee and CB Underwood though I probably have to wait until the Titans game for that.

Also more of the S... I think I've seen enough of Collins but what about that rest?
UserPostedImage
PackerBuddha
15 years ago
1. How the Secondary fares against Warner and Co. Even though Boldin and Breaston arent playing, Warner is still a great QB and can make any WR look good.

2. Pressure on the QB, no matter how good your secondary is they can only hold coverage for so long,

3. Lets see if Rodgers, and Grant can continue on the path they are on so far.
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
tonyagnese
15 years ago

1. How the Secondary fares against Warner and Co. Even though Boldin and Breaston arent playing, Warner is still a great QB and can make any WR look good.

2. Pressure on the QB, no matter how good your secondary is they can only hold coverage for so long,

3. Lets see if Rodgers, and Grant can continue on the path they are on so far.

"PackerBuddha" wrote:



Warner and Fitz are enough to give the Packers a pretty decent challenge on defense.
blank
PackerBuddha
15 years ago

1. How the Secondary fares against Warner and Co. Even though Boldin and Breaston arent playing, Warner is still a great QB and can make any WR look good.

2. Pressure on the QB, no matter how good your secondary is they can only hold coverage for so long,

3. Lets see if Rodgers, and Grant can continue on the path they are on so far.

"tonyagnese" wrote:



Warner and Fitz are enough to give the Packers a pretty decent challenge on defense.

"PackerBuddha" wrote:



That is true..but Fitz is only one guy...Fitz, Boldin, and Breaston would have been a very good test for the whole secondary.

Tonight you can lock Fitz up with Woodson or Harris and not have to much to worry about, he will get his catches but i dont think he will have a huge day.
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
Stevetarded
15 years ago
The pass rush will get a real test. Warner is usually great at getting the ball out quickly.
blank
nyrpack
15 years ago
as much as i want to see the guys on the bubble perform, im really interested in our starters, the offense has to keep clicking the way it has the 1st 2 games and our dee has to keep that edge its been showing, so it can continue into the regular season !!
jimmy b.
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (14m) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23m) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (35m) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (1h) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (1h) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (1h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (1h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (1h) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (1h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (3h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (3h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (3h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (3h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (4h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (4h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (4h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (4h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (4h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (4h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (4h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (4h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (4h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (4h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (4h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (4h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (4h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (4h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (4h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (4h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
packerfanoutwest (5h) : falcons are already ahead of us
beast (5h) : Packers will get in
beast (5h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
packerfanoutwest (5h) : they still are in the playoffs
packerfanoutwest (5h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
Zero2Cool (6h) : We can say it. We don't play.
Mucky Tundra (8h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
Mucky Tundra (8h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
Mucky Tundra (8h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
buckeyepackfan (8h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
Mucky Tundra (17h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (18h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
bboystyle (18h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
buckeyepackfan (21h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
11m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

3h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.