Pack93z
15 years ago
Look at some sample numbers here .

This has gone way to far off the original topic to be saved... were we not talking about emulating the Patriots blueprint here. šŸ˜‰
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
15 years ago

just for fun, you wanna do a comparable TD table, LT?

"TheOldMan" wrote:




FYI non started this and I thought was interesting he also posted the tds as well..But I'll do it again

http://www.coldhardfootballfacts.com/Articles/11_2623_The_mighty_CHFF_interception_ladder.html 



Teams that toss more touchdowns than their opponents are 207-62 (.770)

Teams that toss fewer interceptions than their opponents are 258-56 (.822).


The most interesting part of the interception ladder is not just that INTs are costly.

Sure, chronicling the actual percentages is nice, but we all know that turnovers cost teams.

The most interesting part is that throwing INTs or, more specifically, not throwing INTs is actually more important than throwing touchdowns in the playoffs.

Last week alone, teams that threw more touchdown passes were 1-2; teams that threw fewer interceptions were 2-1. (The TD and INT numbers were even in one game each.)

Its a bit shocking, considering that the name of the game is to get the ball into the end zone. So you would think that getting the ball into end zone is actually a pretty important indicator. It is, of course, as evidenced by the .770 winning percentage. But it's simply more important to keep the ball out of the hands of your opponent.

"longtimefan" wrote:



That's ironic.

That site is a known Favre hating site.

So I'd take anything they say with a couple pounds of salt.

"bozz_2006" wrote:



Hahaha are you saying that their criticism of interceptions in the playoffs is related to their hatred of Favre? Hahahahahaha... oh my god that's great. I couldn't have come up with anything funnier.
UserPostedImage
dhazer
15 years ago

just for fun, you wanna do a comparable TD table, LT?

"MassPackersFan" wrote:




FYI non started this and I thought was interesting he also posted the tds as well..But I'll do it again

http://www.coldhardfootballfacts.com/Articles/11_2623_The_mighty_CHFF_interception_ladder.html 



Teams that toss more touchdowns than their opponents are 207-62 (.770)

Teams that toss fewer interceptions than their opponents are 258-56 (.822).


The most interesting part of the interception ladder is not just that INTs are costly.

Sure, chronicling the actual percentages is nice, but we all know that turnovers cost teams.

The most interesting part is that throwing INTs or, more specifically, not throwing INTs is actually more important than throwing touchdowns in the playoffs.

Last week alone, teams that threw more touchdown passes were 1-2; teams that threw fewer interceptions were 2-1. (The TD and INT numbers were even in one game each.)

Its a bit shocking, considering that the name of the game is to get the ball into the end zone. So you would think that getting the ball into end zone is actually a pretty important indicator. It is, of course, as evidenced by the .770 winning percentage. But it's simply more important to keep the ball out of the hands of your opponent.

"TheOldMan" wrote:



That's ironic.

That site is a known Favre hating site.

So I'd take anything they say with a couple pounds of salt.

"longtimefan" wrote:



Hahaha are you saying that their criticism of interceptions in the playoffs is related to their hatred of Favre? Hahahahahaha... oh my god that's great. I couldn't have come up with anything funnier.

"bozz_2006" wrote:



Is Non and LTF still on the interception thing maybe they should take a look at the thread Packz started and look at Bradshaws stats and he has 4 super bowl rings.
Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be šŸ™‚ (PS, Zero should charge for this)
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
15 years ago

Is Non and LTF still on the interception thing maybe they should take a look at the thread Packz started and look at Bradshaws stats and he has 4 super bowl rings.

"dhazer" wrote:

Dude, Bradshaw had one of if not THE most feared defense for many years man. You turn the ball over, the defense would get it BACK for you right away. HUGE DIFFERENCE!
UserPostedImage
TheOldMan
15 years ago

just for fun, you wanna do a comparable TD table, LT?

"MassPackersFan" wrote:




FYI non started this and I thought was interesting he also posted the tds as well..But I'll do it again

http://www.coldhardfootballfacts.com/Articles/11_2623_The_mighty_CHFF_interception_ladder.html 



Teams that toss more touchdowns than their opponents are 207-62 (.770)

Teams that toss fewer interceptions than their opponents are 258-56 (.822).


The most interesting part of the interception ladder is not just that INTs are costly.

Sure, chronicling the actual percentages is nice, but we all know that turnovers cost teams.

The most interesting part is that throwing INTs or, more specifically, not throwing INTs is actually more important than throwing touchdowns in the playoffs.

Last week alone, teams that threw more touchdown passes were 1-2; teams that threw fewer interceptions were 2-1. (The TD and INT numbers were even in one game each.)

Its a bit shocking, considering that the name of the game is to get the ball into the end zone. So you would think that getting the ball into end zone is actually a pretty important indicator. It is, of course, as evidenced by the .770 winning percentage. But it's simply more important to keep the ball out of the hands of your opponent.

"TheOldMan" wrote:



That's ironic.

That site is a known Favre hating site.

So I'd take anything they say with a couple pounds of salt.

"longtimefan" wrote:



Hahaha are you saying that their criticism of interceptions in the playoffs is related to their hatred of Favre? Hahahahahaha... oh my god that's great. I couldn't have come up with anything funnier.

"bozz_2006" wrote:



No, i'm just saying that it's a discredited, Favre hating, garbage piece of a website.

Look at the crap they have posted on Favre up there now, if you don't believe me.
Truth be known, I'm TT's baby!
dhazer
15 years ago

Is Non and LTF still on the interception thing maybe they should take a look at the thread Packz started and look at Bradshaws stats and he has 4 super bowl rings.

"SlickVision" wrote:

Dude, Bradshaw had one of if not THE most feared defense for many years man. You turn the ball over, the defense would get it BACK for you right away. HUGE DIFFERENCE!

"dhazer" wrote:




Ok Bart Starr 4.38% of passes were INTs look at his thread Zero it will shock you.
Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be šŸ™‚ (PS, Zero should charge for this)
UserPostedImage
longtimefan
15 years ago

just for fun, you wanna do a comparable TD table, LT?

"TheOldMan" wrote:




FYI non started this and I thought was interesting he also posted the tds as well..But I'll do it again

http://www.coldhardfootballfacts.com/Articles/11_2623_The_mighty_CHFF_interception_ladder.html 



Teams that toss more touchdowns than their opponents are 207-62 (.770)

Teams that toss fewer interceptions than their opponents are 258-56 (.822).


The most interesting part of the interception ladder is not just that INTs are costly.

Sure, chronicling the actual percentages is nice, but we all know that turnovers cost teams.

The most interesting part is that throwing INTs or, more specifically, not throwing INTs is actually more important than throwing touchdowns in the playoffs.

Last week alone, teams that threw more touchdown passes were 1-2; teams that threw fewer interceptions were 2-1. (The TD and INT numbers were even in one game each.)

Its a bit shocking, considering that the name of the game is to get the ball into the end zone. So you would think that getting the ball into end zone is actually a pretty important indicator. It is, of course, as evidenced by the .770 winning percentage. But it's simply more important to keep the ball out of the hands of your opponent.

"MassPackersFan" wrote:



That's ironic.

That site is a known Favre hating site.

So I'd take anything they say with a couple pounds of salt.

"TheOldMan" wrote:



Hahaha are you saying that their criticism of interceptions in the playoffs is related to their hatred of Favre? Hahahahahaha... oh my god that's great. I couldn't have come up with anything funnier.

"longtimefan" wrote:



No, i'm just saying that it's a discredited, Favre hating, garbage piece of a website.

Look at the crap they have posted on Favre up there now, if you don't believe me.

"bozz_2006" wrote:



Care to show me where I posted ANYTHING about Brett?
Nonstopdrivel
15 years ago

No, i'm just saying that it's a discredited, Favre hating, garbage piece of a website.

"TheOldMan" wrote:



Discredited by whom, pray tell? Links, please. And why do you bring Favre into your criticism of this article when he's mentioned nowhere in it?
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
15 years ago

I can't actually take credit for the Willimas statement. Last year in August at the Harley Fest I had the priviledge of talking privately with Bill Micheals (the big unit) and he was telling me how important Willimas was to the defensive line even though his number were not huge. It was Bill that correctly forecasted our defensive line would be in big trouble without Williams.

I think we have possibly solved that issue with the addition of Raji.

"Trippster" wrote:



I have to think that losing Cullen Jenkins combined with losing Williams was the reason for the DL collapse, far more so than the loss of Williams. Cullen was a every down player, Williams was a rotation guy. I believe.

Either way, we were doing better when Cullen was in there and there wasn't that much of a drop off until he was injured. That's when our DL took a poopie.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (12m) : Fills the openin they had
buckeyepackfan (1h) : Sean Clifford signed to 53 man roster.
Martha Careful (8h) : Two terrific NCAA Football Semi-Final Games...We can only hope the Championship game is as good
Zero2Cool (10-Jan) : Eagles WR DeVonta Smith will be a DNP in todayā€™s practice. Heā€™s dealing with back tightness. But the expectation is that heā€™ll play Sunday.
Zero2Cool (10-Jan) : Jalen Hurts has cleared the concussion protocol. Heā€™s playing Sunday.
Zero2Cool (10-Jan) : š•avier McKinney First Team All-Pro
Zero2Cool (10-Jan) : NFL moves Vikings-Rams playoff tilt to Arizona due to fires
Zero2Cool (10-Jan) : Rams lose home field advantage for Monday game.
Mucky Tundra (9-Jan) : Notre Lame=Notre Dame, Luckeyes=Ohio State, Pedo St=Penn St
Zero2Cool (9-Jan) : ... It clearly was not what we were supposed to be in, certainly."
Zero2Cool (9-Jan) : Hafley says 3rd and 11 call there was a miscommunication.
Zero2Cool (9-Jan) : The only team I know is Texas from that. Who are the other three?
Mucky Tundra (9-Jan) : Notre Lame vs Pedo St tonight and the Luckeyes vs Texas tomorrow
Mucky Tundra (9-Jan) : Stud
Zero2Cool (9-Jan) : E. Cooper. Rookie of Month. Defense.
Mucky Tundra (8-Jan) : @AaronNagler Ā· 2m Both Jordan Love and Malik Willis were Limited participants at Packers practice today.
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : Johnson didn't make it until 2020. Ring 2023. šŸ¤· Personally, he should have been in years prior to Hall.
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : HUMP DAY
beast (8-Jan) : Guys that have a good shot at making the NFL Hall of Fame usually get into their teams pretty fast
beast (8-Jan) : Yeah, but is Kampman and the others in the NFL Hall of Fame?
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : Johnson was Hall of Fame, 2020. Should haev been in Ring a year later, not three years.
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : I could be wrong there though
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : Guys like Kampman, Tim Harris, Al Harris, etc all over 15 years. Hall of Fame is 5 year wait
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : I guess I see players in Packers Hall come way later
beast (8-Jan) : Yeah, usually teams hall of fames are a much lower bar than the NFL
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : is it uncommon for Hall before Ring?
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : S Xavier McKinney named first-team All-Pro by NFLPA
beast (8-Jan) : I missed it, sorry, but he got into the NFL Hall of Fame years before that
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : Jones took his sweet ole time!
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : Yeah, he's in the ring of honor, just saw video and his name is up there
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : Didn't they have a thing in 2023 for Jimmy's ring of honor? I swear I saw it
beast (8-Jan) : Though if they're legitimately trying to re-sign MM, then it makes sense.
beast (8-Jan) : Jerry Jones still hasn't put Jimmy Johnson in the Ring of Honor, but he's in the NFL's Hall of Fame, Jones is petty
Mucky Tundra (8-Jan) : Unless the Cowboys are planning an extension, seems kinda petty
beast (8-Jan) : Cowboys denied Bears request
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : From what I'm reading, MM is under contract through the 14th of January; after that he's free game
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : McCarthy let go or not extended??
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Chicago Bears have asked the Dallas Cowboys permission to interview Mike McCarthy for head coaching vacancy
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : The winners page that is
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : I was not hoping for that. It messes up the page lol
beast (6-Jan) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3.
beast (6-Jan) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3.
beast (6-Jan) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : congrats beast on 2024 !
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : congrats porky on winning 2023 pick'em! (oops sorry)
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : Packers have $60M+ of 2025 cap space on paper TODAY.
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Missed FG into a Lions TD; that'll do pig, that'll do
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : That might be it for the Vikings
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Oh so the refs do know what intentional grounding is
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : what the hell was that Goff?! Not much pressure and he just air mails it to Harrison
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

10-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

10-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

9-Jan / Around The NFL / beast

9-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

9-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

8-Jan / Around The NFL / beast

7-Jan / Fantasy Sports Talk / wpr

7-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

7-Jan / Fantasy Sports Talk / Zero2Cool

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright Ā© 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.comā„¢. All Rights Reserved.