Pack93z
15 years ago
Look at some sample numbers here .

This has gone way to far off the original topic to be saved... were we not talking about emulating the Patriots blueprint here. 😉
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
15 years ago

just for fun, you wanna do a comparable TD table, LT?

"TheOldMan" wrote:




FYI non started this and I thought was interesting he also posted the tds as well..But I'll do it again

http://www.coldhardfootballfacts.com/Articles/11_2623_The_mighty_CHFF_interception_ladder.html 



Teams that toss more touchdowns than their opponents are 207-62 (.770)

Teams that toss fewer interceptions than their opponents are 258-56 (.822).


The most interesting part of the interception ladder is not just that INTs are costly.

Sure, chronicling the actual percentages is nice, but we all know that turnovers cost teams.

The most interesting part is that throwing INTs or, more specifically, not throwing INTs is actually more important than throwing touchdowns in the playoffs.

Last week alone, teams that threw more touchdown passes were 1-2; teams that threw fewer interceptions were 2-1. (The TD and INT numbers were even in one game each.)

Its a bit shocking, considering that the name of the game is to get the ball into the end zone. So you would think that getting the ball into end zone is actually a pretty important indicator. It is, of course, as evidenced by the .770 winning percentage. But it's simply more important to keep the ball out of the hands of your opponent.

"longtimefan" wrote:



That's ironic.

That site is a known Favre hating site.

So I'd take anything they say with a couple pounds of salt.

"bozz_2006" wrote:



Hahaha are you saying that their criticism of interceptions in the playoffs is related to their hatred of Favre? Hahahahahaha... oh my god that's great. I couldn't have come up with anything funnier.
UserPostedImage
dhazer
15 years ago

just for fun, you wanna do a comparable TD table, LT?

"MassPackersFan" wrote:




FYI non started this and I thought was interesting he also posted the tds as well..But I'll do it again

http://www.coldhardfootballfacts.com/Articles/11_2623_The_mighty_CHFF_interception_ladder.html 



Teams that toss more touchdowns than their opponents are 207-62 (.770)

Teams that toss fewer interceptions than their opponents are 258-56 (.822).


The most interesting part of the interception ladder is not just that INTs are costly.

Sure, chronicling the actual percentages is nice, but we all know that turnovers cost teams.

The most interesting part is that throwing INTs or, more specifically, not throwing INTs is actually more important than throwing touchdowns in the playoffs.

Last week alone, teams that threw more touchdown passes were 1-2; teams that threw fewer interceptions were 2-1. (The TD and INT numbers were even in one game each.)

Its a bit shocking, considering that the name of the game is to get the ball into the end zone. So you would think that getting the ball into end zone is actually a pretty important indicator. It is, of course, as evidenced by the .770 winning percentage. But it's simply more important to keep the ball out of the hands of your opponent.

"TheOldMan" wrote:



That's ironic.

That site is a known Favre hating site.

So I'd take anything they say with a couple pounds of salt.

"longtimefan" wrote:



Hahaha are you saying that their criticism of interceptions in the playoffs is related to their hatred of Favre? Hahahahahaha... oh my god that's great. I couldn't have come up with anything funnier.

"bozz_2006" wrote:



Is Non and LTF still on the interception thing maybe they should take a look at the thread Packz started and look at Bradshaws stats and he has 4 super bowl rings.
Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
15 years ago

Is Non and LTF still on the interception thing maybe they should take a look at the thread Packz started and look at Bradshaws stats and he has 4 super bowl rings.

"dhazer" wrote:

Dude, Bradshaw had one of if not THE most feared defense for many years man. You turn the ball over, the defense would get it BACK for you right away. HUGE DIFFERENCE!
UserPostedImage
TheOldMan
15 years ago

just for fun, you wanna do a comparable TD table, LT?

"MassPackersFan" wrote:




FYI non started this and I thought was interesting he also posted the tds as well..But I'll do it again

http://www.coldhardfootballfacts.com/Articles/11_2623_The_mighty_CHFF_interception_ladder.html 



Teams that toss more touchdowns than their opponents are 207-62 (.770)

Teams that toss fewer interceptions than their opponents are 258-56 (.822).


The most interesting part of the interception ladder is not just that INTs are costly.

Sure, chronicling the actual percentages is nice, but we all know that turnovers cost teams.

The most interesting part is that throwing INTs or, more specifically, not throwing INTs is actually more important than throwing touchdowns in the playoffs.

Last week alone, teams that threw more touchdown passes were 1-2; teams that threw fewer interceptions were 2-1. (The TD and INT numbers were even in one game each.)

Its a bit shocking, considering that the name of the game is to get the ball into the end zone. So you would think that getting the ball into end zone is actually a pretty important indicator. It is, of course, as evidenced by the .770 winning percentage. But it's simply more important to keep the ball out of the hands of your opponent.

"TheOldMan" wrote:



That's ironic.

That site is a known Favre hating site.

So I'd take anything they say with a couple pounds of salt.

"longtimefan" wrote:



Hahaha are you saying that their criticism of interceptions in the playoffs is related to their hatred of Favre? Hahahahahaha... oh my god that's great. I couldn't have come up with anything funnier.

"bozz_2006" wrote:



No, i'm just saying that it's a discredited, Favre hating, garbage piece of a website.

Look at the crap they have posted on Favre up there now, if you don't believe me.
Truth be known, I'm TT's baby!
dhazer
15 years ago

Is Non and LTF still on the interception thing maybe they should take a look at the thread Packz started and look at Bradshaws stats and he has 4 super bowl rings.

"SlickVision" wrote:

Dude, Bradshaw had one of if not THE most feared defense for many years man. You turn the ball over, the defense would get it BACK for you right away. HUGE DIFFERENCE!

"dhazer" wrote:




Ok Bart Starr 4.38% of passes were INTs look at his thread Zero it will shock you.
Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)
UserPostedImage
longtimefan
15 years ago

just for fun, you wanna do a comparable TD table, LT?

"TheOldMan" wrote:




FYI non started this and I thought was interesting he also posted the tds as well..But I'll do it again

http://www.coldhardfootballfacts.com/Articles/11_2623_The_mighty_CHFF_interception_ladder.html 



Teams that toss more touchdowns than their opponents are 207-62 (.770)

Teams that toss fewer interceptions than their opponents are 258-56 (.822).


The most interesting part of the interception ladder is not just that INTs are costly.

Sure, chronicling the actual percentages is nice, but we all know that turnovers cost teams.

The most interesting part is that throwing INTs or, more specifically, not throwing INTs is actually more important than throwing touchdowns in the playoffs.

Last week alone, teams that threw more touchdown passes were 1-2; teams that threw fewer interceptions were 2-1. (The TD and INT numbers were even in one game each.)

Its a bit shocking, considering that the name of the game is to get the ball into the end zone. So you would think that getting the ball into end zone is actually a pretty important indicator. It is, of course, as evidenced by the .770 winning percentage. But it's simply more important to keep the ball out of the hands of your opponent.

"MassPackersFan" wrote:



That's ironic.

That site is a known Favre hating site.

So I'd take anything they say with a couple pounds of salt.

"TheOldMan" wrote:



Hahaha are you saying that their criticism of interceptions in the playoffs is related to their hatred of Favre? Hahahahahaha... oh my god that's great. I couldn't have come up with anything funnier.

"longtimefan" wrote:



No, i'm just saying that it's a discredited, Favre hating, garbage piece of a website.

Look at the crap they have posted on Favre up there now, if you don't believe me.

"bozz_2006" wrote:



Care to show me where I posted ANYTHING about Brett?
Nonstopdrivel
15 years ago

No, i'm just saying that it's a discredited, Favre hating, garbage piece of a website.

"TheOldMan" wrote:



Discredited by whom, pray tell? Links, please. And why do you bring Favre into your criticism of this article when he's mentioned nowhere in it?
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
15 years ago

I can't actually take credit for the Willimas statement. Last year in August at the Harley Fest I had the priviledge of talking privately with Bill Micheals (the big unit) and he was telling me how important Willimas was to the defensive line even though his number were not huge. It was Bill that correctly forecasted our defensive line would be in big trouble without Williams.

I think we have possibly solved that issue with the addition of Raji.

"Trippster" wrote:



I have to think that losing Cullen Jenkins combined with losing Williams was the reason for the DL collapse, far more so than the loss of Williams. Cullen was a every down player, Williams was a rotation guy. I believe.

Either way, we were doing better when Cullen was in there and there wasn't that much of a drop off until he was injured. That's when our DL took a poopie.
UserPostedImage
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    beast (4h) : The Packers re-signed three exclusive rights free agents WR Melton, P Whelan and RB Wilson.
    Zero2Cool (17h) : February 5, 2002 (age 23) ok no. packers.com is wrong
    Zero2Cool (17h) : Micah Robinson is only 19??
    Zero2Cool (19h) : 6 first rounders on Packers defense now
    Zero2Cool (29-Apr) : LB Isaiah Simmons. Signed. Called it!!! Oh yeah!
    Martha Careful (29-Apr) : ty bboystyle...fat fingers
    bboystyle (29-Apr) : Tom*
    Martha Careful (28-Apr) : RIP Packer Safety Tim Brown
    beast (27-Apr) : Yeah, but also some of the wording suggestions Jax only pranked called the QB, not the others... and if he had an open spreadsheet & 3 calls
    beast (27-Apr) : Thank goodness he's not leaving the Turtle in the Red Tide
    Mucky Tundra (27-Apr) : Cowboys 1st round pick Tyler Booker will indeed be bringing his pet turtle to Dallas with him
    Mucky Tundra (27-Apr) : that contained all prospects info and contact
    Mucky Tundra (27-Apr) : beast, according the Falcons statement Jax came across it on an ipad. If I had to guess, probably an open spread sheet or something
    Zero2Cool (27-Apr) : Simmons put up an emoji with cheese.
    beast (27-Apr) : Not sure anyone is interested in Isaiah Simmons... Collin Oliver might of taken his potential slot
    beast (27-Apr) : I'm going with Jax Ulbrich is not telling the whole truth... he accidentally came across it? Why would a defensive coordinator have a QB #?
    Zero2Cool (27-Apr) : He's not that great, but final piece of the script.\
    Zero2Cool (27-Apr) : If we add Isaiah Simmons, book your Super Bowl tickets
    Mucky Tundra (27-Apr) : Colts 1st round TE Tyler Warren also got prank called, was that Jax Ulbrich as well?
    Zero2Cool (27-Apr) : Jax Ulbrich, Jeff Ulbrich’s son, released an apology for his role in the Shedeur Sanders prank call.
    Martha Careful (27-Apr) : apparently he did not participate in practice or play on the east west shrine game nor the NFL combine. The kid was a mediocre spoiled brat
    Mucky Tundra (27-Apr) : Yeah that one that was a super wounded duck that Sanders supporters are highlighting to prove a point
    Zero2Cool (27-Apr) : Shough is the guy who missed guys at combine isn't he?
    beast (27-Apr) : It's not official until I'm dead! I have a chance still! (Not really)
    Mucky Tundra (27-Apr) : I could feel my body decomposing in real time when I read that
    Mucky Tundra (27-Apr) : @MIKEYSAINRISTIL Tyler Shough will officially be the last person drafted to the NFL born in the 1900’s
    Mucky Tundra (26-Apr) : saw the tweet, he meant the city
    Mucky Tundra (26-Apr) : Was that for the team or the city?
    Zero2Cool (26-Apr) : Adam Schefter @AdamSchefter · 3m Draft grade is in: Green Bay gets an A. The people, the city, the venue were all superb. NFL Draft’s next
    Zero2Cool (26-Apr) : Matt LaFleur says Jaire Alexander is participating in #Packers offseason program, which has been conducted virtually during this first week
    Zero2Cool (26-Apr) : ✅ ...
    buckeyepackfan (26-Apr) : Check
    Zero2Cool (26-Apr) : Matthew Golden cahanged 81 to 22??
    TheKanataThrilla (26-Apr) : Sam Howell to Vikings...guess no Aaron
    Martha Careful (26-Apr) : 1 round 7 min, with one extra minute if there is a trade. 2nd round 4 minutes, 3rd -3, 2 thereafter IMO
    Martha Careful (26-Apr) : Agree
    dfosterf (26-Apr) : Great idea imo
    dfosterf (26-Apr) : 1st round to 7 minutes with one extension
    dfosterf (26-Apr) : NFL comissioner wants to shorten the 2st
    Mucky Tundra (26-Apr) : @jalenreagors They’re discussing if Sheduer can go back to college on NFL Network LMFAOOOOO
    beast (26-Apr) : Great point Martha
    beast (26-Apr) : Buddy Ryan used to say if a candy bar goes missing, there are two to blame, Rex and Rob 🤪 jk 😁
    Martha Careful (26-Apr) : Bum Phillips used to say there are two ways to get better. Get better players or get players to play better. We have a new DL coach
    Zero2Cool (26-Apr) : Yes. Look at the losses last year. They can win.
    beast (26-Apr) : Can Packers win with their current DL?
    bboystyle (26-Apr) : waiting for a pass rusher.
    dfosterf (25-Apr) : 5 minutes between picks in the 3rd
    dfosterf (25-Apr) : 3rd. Hate this phone
    dfosterf (25-Apr) : 4rd
    dfosterf (25-Apr) : 5 minutes in the 4
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
    Vikings
    Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    Recent Topics
    8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    11h / Packers Draft Threads / Mucky Tundra

    11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    29-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    27-Apr / Packers Draft Threads / Mucky Tundra

    27-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    27-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    27-Apr / Around The NFL / bboystyle

    27-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    27-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    27-Apr / Packers Draft Threads / wpr

    27-Apr / Packers Draft Threads / wpr

    27-Apr / Packers Draft Threads / wpr

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.