Pack93z
16 years ago
Look at some sample numbers here .

This has gone way to far off the original topic to be saved... were we not talking about emulating the Patriots blueprint here. 😉
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
16 years ago

just for fun, you wanna do a comparable TD table, LT?

"TheOldMan" wrote:




FYI non started this and I thought was interesting he also posted the tds as well..But I'll do it again

http://www.coldhardfootballfacts.com/Articles/11_2623_The_mighty_CHFF_interception_ladder.html 



Teams that toss more touchdowns than their opponents are 207-62 (.770)

Teams that toss fewer interceptions than their opponents are 258-56 (.822).


The most interesting part of the interception ladder is not just that INTs are costly.

Sure, chronicling the actual percentages is nice, but we all know that turnovers cost teams.

The most interesting part is that throwing INTs or, more specifically, not throwing INTs is actually more important than throwing touchdowns in the playoffs.

Last week alone, teams that threw more touchdown passes were 1-2; teams that threw fewer interceptions were 2-1. (The TD and INT numbers were even in one game each.)

Its a bit shocking, considering that the name of the game is to get the ball into the end zone. So you would think that getting the ball into end zone is actually a pretty important indicator. It is, of course, as evidenced by the .770 winning percentage. But it's simply more important to keep the ball out of the hands of your opponent.

"longtimefan" wrote:



That's ironic.

That site is a known Favre hating site.

So I'd take anything they say with a couple pounds of salt.

"bozz_2006" wrote:



Hahaha are you saying that their criticism of interceptions in the playoffs is related to their hatred of Favre? Hahahahahaha... oh my god that's great. I couldn't have come up with anything funnier.
UserPostedImage
dhazer
16 years ago

just for fun, you wanna do a comparable TD table, LT?

"MassPackersFan" wrote:




FYI non started this and I thought was interesting he also posted the tds as well..But I'll do it again

http://www.coldhardfootballfacts.com/Articles/11_2623_The_mighty_CHFF_interception_ladder.html 



Teams that toss more touchdowns than their opponents are 207-62 (.770)

Teams that toss fewer interceptions than their opponents are 258-56 (.822).


The most interesting part of the interception ladder is not just that INTs are costly.

Sure, chronicling the actual percentages is nice, but we all know that turnovers cost teams.

The most interesting part is that throwing INTs or, more specifically, not throwing INTs is actually more important than throwing touchdowns in the playoffs.

Last week alone, teams that threw more touchdown passes were 1-2; teams that threw fewer interceptions were 2-1. (The TD and INT numbers were even in one game each.)

Its a bit shocking, considering that the name of the game is to get the ball into the end zone. So you would think that getting the ball into end zone is actually a pretty important indicator. It is, of course, as evidenced by the .770 winning percentage. But it's simply more important to keep the ball out of the hands of your opponent.

"TheOldMan" wrote:



That's ironic.

That site is a known Favre hating site.

So I'd take anything they say with a couple pounds of salt.

"longtimefan" wrote:



Hahaha are you saying that their criticism of interceptions in the playoffs is related to their hatred of Favre? Hahahahahaha... oh my god that's great. I couldn't have come up with anything funnier.

"bozz_2006" wrote:



Is Non and LTF still on the interception thing maybe they should take a look at the thread Packz started and look at Bradshaws stats and he has 4 super bowl rings.
Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
16 years ago

Is Non and LTF still on the interception thing maybe they should take a look at the thread Packz started and look at Bradshaws stats and he has 4 super bowl rings.

"dhazer" wrote:

Dude, Bradshaw had one of if not THE most feared defense for many years man. You turn the ball over, the defense would get it BACK for you right away. HUGE DIFFERENCE!
UserPostedImage
TheOldMan
16 years ago

just for fun, you wanna do a comparable TD table, LT?

"MassPackersFan" wrote:




FYI non started this and I thought was interesting he also posted the tds as well..But I'll do it again

http://www.coldhardfootballfacts.com/Articles/11_2623_The_mighty_CHFF_interception_ladder.html 



Teams that toss more touchdowns than their opponents are 207-62 (.770)

Teams that toss fewer interceptions than their opponents are 258-56 (.822).


The most interesting part of the interception ladder is not just that INTs are costly.

Sure, chronicling the actual percentages is nice, but we all know that turnovers cost teams.

The most interesting part is that throwing INTs or, more specifically, not throwing INTs is actually more important than throwing touchdowns in the playoffs.

Last week alone, teams that threw more touchdown passes were 1-2; teams that threw fewer interceptions were 2-1. (The TD and INT numbers were even in one game each.)

Its a bit shocking, considering that the name of the game is to get the ball into the end zone. So you would think that getting the ball into end zone is actually a pretty important indicator. It is, of course, as evidenced by the .770 winning percentage. But it's simply more important to keep the ball out of the hands of your opponent.

"TheOldMan" wrote:



That's ironic.

That site is a known Favre hating site.

So I'd take anything they say with a couple pounds of salt.

"longtimefan" wrote:



Hahaha are you saying that their criticism of interceptions in the playoffs is related to their hatred of Favre? Hahahahahaha... oh my god that's great. I couldn't have come up with anything funnier.

"bozz_2006" wrote:



No, i'm just saying that it's a discredited, Favre hating, garbage piece of a website.

Look at the crap they have posted on Favre up there now, if you don't believe me.
Truth be known, I'm TT's baby!
dhazer
16 years ago

Is Non and LTF still on the interception thing maybe they should take a look at the thread Packz started and look at Bradshaws stats and he has 4 super bowl rings.

"SlickVision" wrote:

Dude, Bradshaw had one of if not THE most feared defense for many years man. You turn the ball over, the defense would get it BACK for you right away. HUGE DIFFERENCE!

"dhazer" wrote:




Ok Bart Starr 4.38% of passes were INTs look at his thread Zero it will shock you.
Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)
UserPostedImage
longtimefan
16 years ago

just for fun, you wanna do a comparable TD table, LT?

"TheOldMan" wrote:




FYI non started this and I thought was interesting he also posted the tds as well..But I'll do it again

http://www.coldhardfootballfacts.com/Articles/11_2623_The_mighty_CHFF_interception_ladder.html 



Teams that toss more touchdowns than their opponents are 207-62 (.770)

Teams that toss fewer interceptions than their opponents are 258-56 (.822).


The most interesting part of the interception ladder is not just that INTs are costly.

Sure, chronicling the actual percentages is nice, but we all know that turnovers cost teams.

The most interesting part is that throwing INTs or, more specifically, not throwing INTs is actually more important than throwing touchdowns in the playoffs.

Last week alone, teams that threw more touchdown passes were 1-2; teams that threw fewer interceptions were 2-1. (The TD and INT numbers were even in one game each.)

Its a bit shocking, considering that the name of the game is to get the ball into the end zone. So you would think that getting the ball into end zone is actually a pretty important indicator. It is, of course, as evidenced by the .770 winning percentage. But it's simply more important to keep the ball out of the hands of your opponent.

"MassPackersFan" wrote:



That's ironic.

That site is a known Favre hating site.

So I'd take anything they say with a couple pounds of salt.

"TheOldMan" wrote:



Hahaha are you saying that their criticism of interceptions in the playoffs is related to their hatred of Favre? Hahahahahaha... oh my god that's great. I couldn't have come up with anything funnier.

"longtimefan" wrote:



No, i'm just saying that it's a discredited, Favre hating, garbage piece of a website.

Look at the crap they have posted on Favre up there now, if you don't believe me.

"bozz_2006" wrote:



Care to show me where I posted ANYTHING about Brett?
Nonstopdrivel
16 years ago

No, i'm just saying that it's a discredited, Favre hating, garbage piece of a website.

"TheOldMan" wrote:



Discredited by whom, pray tell? Links, please. And why do you bring Favre into your criticism of this article when he's mentioned nowhere in it?
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
16 years ago

I can't actually take credit for the Willimas statement. Last year in August at the Harley Fest I had the priviledge of talking privately with Bill Micheals (the big unit) and he was telling me how important Willimas was to the defensive line even though his number were not huge. It was Bill that correctly forecasted our defensive line would be in big trouble without Williams.

I think we have possibly solved that issue with the addition of Raji.

"Trippster" wrote:



I have to think that losing Cullen Jenkins combined with losing Williams was the reason for the DL collapse, far more so than the loss of Williams. Cullen was a every down player, Williams was a rotation guy. I believe.

Either way, we were doing better when Cullen was in there and there wasn't that much of a drop off until he was injured. That's when our DL took a poopie.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (8h) : GB-Minnesota 2004 Wild Card game popped up on my YouTube page....UGH
beast (12h) : Hmm 🤔 re-signing Walker before Tom? Sounds highly questionable to me.
Mucky Tundra (22h) : One person on Twitter=cannon law
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Well, to ONE person on Tweeter
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : According to Tweeter
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Packers are working on extension for LT Walker they hope to have done before camp
dfosterf (18-Jun) : E4B landed at Andrews last night
dfosterf (18-Jun) : 101 in a 60
dfosterf (18-Jun) : FAFO
Zero2Cool (18-Jun) : one year $4m with incentives to make it up to $6m
dfosterf (18-Jun) : Or Lions
dfosterf (18-Jun) : Beats the hell out of a Vikings signing
Zero2Cool (18-Jun) : Baltimore Ravens now have signed former Packers CB Jaire Alexander.
dfosterf (14-Jun) : TWO magnificent strikes for touchdowns. Lose the pennstate semigeezer non nfl backup
dfosterf (14-Jun) : There was minicamp Thursday. My man Taylor Engersma threw
dfosterf (11-Jun) : There will be a mini camp practice Thursday.
Zero2Cool (11-Jun) : He's been sporting a ring for a while now. It's probably Madonna.
Martha Careful (10-Jun) : We only do the tea before whoopee, it relaxes me.
wpr (10-Jun) : That's awesome Martha.
Mucky Tundra (10-Jun) : How's the ayahuasca tea he makes, Martha?
Martha Careful (10-Jun) : Turns out he like older women
Martha Careful (10-Jun) : I wasn't supposed to say anything, but yes the word is out and we are happy 😂😂😂
Mucky Tundra (10-Jun) : I might be late on this but Aaron Rodgers is now married
Mucky Tundra (10-Jun) : Well he can always ask his brother for pointers
Zero2Cool (10-Jun) : Bo Melton taking some reps at CB as well as WR
Zero2Cool (10-Jun) : key transactions coming today at 3pm that will consume more cap in 2025
Zero2Cool (9-Jun) : Jaire played in just 34 of a possible 68 games since the start of the 2021 season
Zero2Cool (9-Jun) : reported, but not expected to practice
Zero2Cool (9-Jun) : Jenkins has REPORTED for mandatory camp
Zero2Cool (9-Jun) : I really thought he'd play for Packers.
buckeyepackfan (9-Jun) : Packers releasing Jaire Alexander.
Mucky Tundra (8-Jun) : (Context: he wants his defense to create turnovers)
Mucky Tundra (8-Jun) : Giants DC Shane Bowen tells players to “be a damn pirate."
dfosterf (6-Jun) : Semper fi !
Cheesey (6-Jun) : This is why I have so much respect for those that have gone through battles
Cheesey (6-Jun) : I can't even imagine what that would have been like
wpr (6-Jun) : "Come on, you sons of bitches. Do you want to live forever?"
wpr (6-Jun) : Facing a line of machine guns 2 time medal of Honor recipient, First Sergeant Dan Daly told his men,
wpr (6-Jun) : Another detachment went into the Belleau Wood.
wpr (6-Jun) : On the 6th the Marines took Hill 142 but suffered terrible losses.
wpr (6-Jun) : It’s time to remember dfoster’s Marine brothers in Belleau Wood. The battle went on from June 1-26. Nearly 10,000 casualties.
packerfanoutwest (6-Jun) : Nick Collins and Morgan Burnett have signed with the PACK
packerfanoutwest (6-Jun) : he won't be wearing #12, maybe he will wear number two
packerfanoutwest (6-Jun) : He will fail this season, should have retired
Mucky Tundra (5-Jun) : Thus the cycle of Hall of Fame Packer QBs going to the Jets and then the Vikings is broken
bboystyle (5-Jun) : Rodgers to steelers on 1 year contract
Zero2Cool (5-Jun) : It's the cycle of civilizations. Get lazier, lazier, softer, softer and vanish.
Martha Careful (5-Jun) : great point. every aspect of society, including art, culture and sports has degraded.
dfosterf (4-Jun) : Green Bay sweep meant something to society about stopping pure excellence. We have the tush push now
dfosterf (4-Jun) : We old Martha.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

18-Jun / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

16-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

15-Jun / Random Babble / Martha Careful

14-Jun / Around The NFL / beast

14-Jun / Community Welcome! / dfosterf

13-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

13-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Adam

12-Jun / Random Babble / Martha Careful

12-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

12-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

12-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

11-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.