Foote released, again and Darnell Dockett just asked to be· Page 2

TengoJuego
Rookie

15 years ago

#11

It'd take a lot to get him probably.

This is my only concern with the whole thing. I think I'd rather have Larry Foote though.

packer98
Registered Topic Starter

15 years ago

#12

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4138192

blank

go.pack.go.
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#13

I definitely don't think we should give up a 1st round pick....I say a 2nd at MOST.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

15 years ago

#14

Docket would be an ideal 3-4 end in my view. It'd take a lot to get him probably. Then again, Arizona is only asking for a second for Boldin so a second for Docket would be fair value as well.

I'd do that, but obviously Green Bay is probably content with what they have. If they do add another defensive lineman, my guess is Vonnie Holiday or Kevin Carter.

Foote seems a lock to go to Detroit.

"porky88" wrote:

They want a 2nd for Dockett? Okay, Brohm, see ya! 🙂

Cheesey
Preferred Member

15 years ago

#15

This thread SHOULD have been titled:
"Foote given the boote!"

beast
Select Member

15 years ago

#16

Okay what's the big deal with Darnell Dockett?

Everyone seems to be in love with him.... and willing to give up a 2nd round pick and give him a huge contract? I say HECK NO!!!

They guy hasn't really done that well IMO... he has played 2 games a year against some of the worst teams in the NFL in 49ers, Rams and Seahawks... and still hasn't shown more to be anything more than Corey Williams....

Williams in my eyes was MR. put up huge numbers against bad teams while the other team focuses on Kampman and KGB and disappear against any good team...

The difference being Dockett showed up on a playoff run but I still don't see him doing it game in and game out....

I rather keep the 2nd or what ever pick and try to trade up for another DT next year (yes another 1st round DT.... what can I say I love linemen and it all starts up front).... plus another reason I say that is because there is...

# Gerald McCoy*, Oklahoma
Height: 6-4. Weight: 295.

# Ndamukong Suh, Nebraska
Height: 6-4. Weight: 305.

# Terrence Cody, Alabama
Height: 6-5. Weight: 365.

I mean if Raji turns out great and we could get another great DL the Packers DL would be awesome. And as the Ravens have shown it doesn't matter how good the LBers are they need good/great DL.... and the Steelers have shown you can take UDFA and make them starting LBers if they have a good/great DL.

Arles
Registered

15 years ago

#17

I'm out here in Arizona and there no chance the Cardinals trade Dockett. He's still under contract for 3 more seasons with them and has little to no leverage (unless he enjoys fines).

That said, he would be a great fit for a 3-4 end and is a key cog in Arizona's move to a 3-4 this offseason. Still, it's not happening. His loss would be way too much for the Cardinals to take.

blank

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (24m) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (24m) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (24m) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (32m) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (33m) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (53m) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (2h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (2h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (2h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (2h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (3h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (3h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (3h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (3h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (3h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (3h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (3h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (3h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (3h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (3h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (3h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (3h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (3h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (3h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (3h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (3h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (3h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (3h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (3h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (4h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

packerfanoutwest (4h) : falcons are already ahead of us

beast (4h) : Packers will get in

beast (4h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen

packerfanoutwest (4h) : they still are in the playoffs

packerfanoutwest (4h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7

Zero2Cool (5h) : We can say it. We don't play.

Mucky Tundra (7h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints

Mucky Tundra (7h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games

Mucky Tundra (7h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.

buckeyepackfan (8h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.

Mucky Tundra (16h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan

beast (17h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings

bboystyle (17h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in

Mucky Tundra (20h) : Or ties, but let's be real here

Mucky Tundra (20h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses

Mucky Tundra (20h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch

buckeyepackfan (20h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?

Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks

Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.

Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS