go.pack.go.
15 years ago

go.pack I see where your coming from but the major difference is the ones in Zero's post is for an off season the ones we are pointing out were on the super bowl rosters.

"dhazer" wrote:



Yes, I knew you were going to say that lol.
UserPostedImage
dd80forever
15 years ago

packers had 5 players not drafted by them on their starting roster in 07....nfc chanp game

they had 8 non drafted starters in 06....no nfc champ game

2003 they had 6....no nfc champ game

2001 they had 6....no nfc champ game

2002 they had 9....no nfc champ game

"longtimefan" wrote:




What is supposed to show? Sorry, I don't understand

"dd80forever" wrote:




Who was GM of those teams?

They guy fans like you say did a better job

"longtimefan" wrote:




Whoa! I said that? Where?

You don't seem to get my point.

What trophies do they hand out for "most FA's started" or "most drafted guys started"

If there are guys available via FA or the street corner I would expect our GM to sign them. If he signs guys who fail to improve the team then he is a piss-poor talent evaluator. If he thinks the guys he already has are capable and we end up with a losing record he is a piss-poor evaluator. Fielding a quality team is a lot different than fielding 22 starters who you drafted.
blank
Stevetarded
15 years ago

sorry lt i count 10 starters for the steelers


but the other people were right that those teams build thru the draft and not free agency.

"dhazer" wrote:



show me 

I count one on offense the Center Jusitn Hartwig,came from Tenn

Then on D James Farrior from Jets


Show me please those 10 starters not drafted by Pitt

I beg you

"longtimefan" wrote:




Well i posted the link but here you go:

Willie Parker
Justin Hartwig
Darnell Stapleton
Travis Kirscke
James Farrior
James Harrison
Ryan Clark
Jeff Reed
Mitch Berger
Gary Russell

hope that helps you.

"dhazer" wrote:



Kirscke, Farrior, Berger, Clark, and Hartwig are the only players out of those who have played on a diffirent team. The rest were Undrafted Free Agents which are much closer to being Draft Picks than the traditional "Free Agent" you were talking about.

next.
blank
dd80forever
15 years ago
Does any of this matter?

Please show me the blueprint on "What combination of guys are needed to win a SB"


Bottom line is talent wins SB. Who cares how they get here and via what method. I want a winner on the field.
blank
Stevetarded
15 years ago

I have never been attracted to the "sign a big name guy" mentality. I would much rather see an improvement in the way the team develops the guys that we draft. It takes longer but it's the best way to build a franchise that can be successful over a long period of time. Hopefully all of the defensive and str/conditioning coaches we hired this offseason can get it done. I think it was the right way to go.

"dhazer" wrote:



Sorry Steve i have to disagree on this one, that was the way to do it back in the 70's and 80's when there wasn't a free agency, that just don't work in this day and age. With free agency you will always be losing players to it no matter what so if we stay with the Ted Thompson plan we will always be rebuilding IMO.

"Stevetarded" wrote:



What are you basing this on? Take a look at the Depth chart of the Steelers or Giants. Most of their starters are players that they drafted. A lot of them aren't even high draft picks.

"dhazer" wrote:





2008 Steelers 10 of the 26 starters werent drafted by the Steelers

2007 Giants 17 of the 26 starters werent drafted by the Giants
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/nyg/2007_roster.htm 



next?

"Stevetarded" wrote:



I only count 9 Giants Players on that list which weren't drafted by them or undrafted free agents. I am sure you counted Eli Manning which goes completely against the point considering the Giants are the only team he ever had anything to do with.
blank
longtimefan
15 years ago

Does any of this matter?

Please show me the blueprint on "What combination of guys are needed to win a SB"


Bottom line is talent wins SB. Who cares how they get here and via what method. I want a winner on the field.

"dd80forever" wrote:



It does when people claim that TED just HAS to get a high priced free agent..

Then when proven wrong, people change their tune and want to include back up that dont even play as proof that you need free agents

And my point about Sherman, was that people want Ted to spend like Sherman, but in reality what did that get the team?
longtimefan
15 years ago

go.pack I see where your coming from but the major difference is the ones in Zero's post is for an off season the ones we are pointing out were on the super bowl rosters.

"dhazer" wrote:



Dont you rag on Ted for getting back up free agents like Pitt had on their roster during the SB?

now you want to praise Pitt for getting free agent back ups?
porky88
15 years ago
You don't build teams via free agency. It doesn't work. You build through the draft. Anyone with a knowledge of the game knows this. People who say you can build via free agency wouldn't be saying this if the Packers had an aggressive GM.

However, the point that needs to be made is you need to use free agency. Yeah I get that Ted Thompson signed Charles Woodson and Ryan Pickett, but he was backed into a corner that year. The team was coming off of a 4-12 season and they needed someone so he actually went out and paid some money. However, when Thompson isn't backed into a corner, he flat out refuses to go big in free agency. That is the problem.

You build via the draft and then you put yourself over the top with a big move or two. This team needs to add a starter. Vonnie Holiday makes sense. Why not Tony G?

It's the lack of activity that is frustrating.

Oh and this talk that some teams have 30 free agents on their roster or whatever. Technically speaking everyone fills their roster out with street free agents, but those guys are no better than a Anthony Smith or Duke Preston. In fact a lot of those players are worse.

Zero's first post is spot on, but obviously those aren't the type of free agents everyone is talking about so this bs that Pittsburgh and New England had 30 free agents is ridiculous. Did they have 30 Ryan Picket like signings?

The answer is No. Their backups were more like Spencer Havner.
Zero2Cool
15 years ago

go.pack I see where your coming from but the major difference is the ones in Zero's post is for an off season the ones we are pointing out were on the super bowl rosters.

"dhazer" wrote:



21 Players from last years Packers roster were not drafted by the Packers. Someone double check my numbers, I counted quick and only have ten fingers and ten toes.
Source Link 
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
15 years ago
Does that count undrafted free agents signed the year they came out? I think for all practical purposes those should count as players drafted. Or players who've never played for another team, if you will.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (28m) : Any reason I'm catching a shot here about my intelligence?
Martha Careful (22h) : thank you Mucky for sticking up for me
Martha Careful (22h) : some of those people are smarter than you zero. However Pete Carroll is not
Mucky Tundra (24-Jan) : Rude!
beast (24-Jan) : Martha? 😋
Zero2Cool (24-Jan) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.
dfosterf (24-Jan) : I'm going with a combination of the two.
beast (24-Jan) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
58m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

22h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.