What the Packers get for Cutler· Page 4

dhazer
Veteran Member

16 years ago

Well i can see them taking Sanchez at #12 but i don't see them trading up to get him, they have tons of holes to fill so i see them going defense with the 1st pick because their defense sucked worse than ours.

Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)

millertime
Member

16 years ago

#32

Anyone think that we could get 12 AND 18 if we threw in our second rounder???

We might be able to nab Andre Smith AND Everette Brown if the chips laid out perfectly!

wils0646
Registered

16 years ago

#33

Anyone think that we could get 12 AND 18 if we threw in our second rounder???

We might be able to nab Andre Smith AND Everette Brown if the chips laid out perfectly!

"millertime" wrote:

:wav:

The Pack Will Be Back.

MassPackersFan
Member

16 years ago

#34

Or Smith and English! :)

I would love a trade that moved us from 9 to 12 and gave us decent value.

warhawk
Senior Member Topic Starter

16 years ago

#35

I actually think this was a dumb move on the part of the Bears. This is the type of move that better bring SB results and this team isn't good enough.

They have an OL with four starters that have been in the league a combined FORTY FIVE years.

Urlacher is on year #10, Ogunleye 9, and A. Brown 8. The only good safety they had is gone.

The only real good D players left after that is Briggs and Harris and in a couple of years those two won't be spring chickens.

Losing all these draft picks to be able to replace these guys is going to hurt them badly over the next couple of years.

Cutler will sure make it interesting in '09 and it could mean great games between us and them but after that I think we will be b-slapping them for the next five years.

"The train is leaving the station."

Yerko
Senior Member

16 years ago

#36

I believe Orton was the steak in the trade deal because Cleveland and Washington were willing to give up Quinn and Campbell (unsure of the draft picks included).
I forgot who said it on ESPN, but they mentioned that McDaniels had said he sees Matt Cassell in Kyle Orton. Now if that is true, he is in for a rude awakening. Anyways, I don't see Denver wanting to move down at all.

warhawk
Senior Member Topic Starter

16 years ago

#37

"AKamp74" wrote:

Ummmm, I think you can bank on it that if Cambell and Quinn were being offered the offer by either team wasn't even close to what the Bears gave up. I think you have to consider that Denver was probably not enamored in anyway by these two so they went with the one with all the picks.

That certainly doesn't mean they are set on Orton by any means.

"The train is leaving the station."

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

16 years ago

#38

The Bronco's wanted Orton over Campbell. It was already reported.

Cheesey
Preferred Member

16 years ago

#39

I forgot who said it on ESPN, but they mentioned that McDaniels had said he sees Matt Cassell in Kyle Orton.

"AKamp74" wrote:

Must have been at a gay bar........

DarkaneRules
Veteran Member

16 years ago

#40

ooooooooo

Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (12h) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying

dfosterf (15h) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount

dfosterf (15h) : Trade, cut or keep

dfosterf (16h) : that from Jaire

dfosterf (16h) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'

Zero2Cool (16h) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"

dfosterf (17h) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it

Zero2Cool (17h) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.

dfosterf (17h) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent

dfosterf (17h) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility

dfosterf (17h) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission

dfosterf (17h) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers

Zero2Cool (17h) : That someone ... likely the agent.

Zero2Cool (17h) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.

Zero2Cool (17h) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.

Zero2Cool (17h) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.

dfosterf (19h) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"

dfosterf (19h) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that

dfosterf (19h) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.

dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move

dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what

Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife

Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately

Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.

dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.

Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Guessing they probably knew. Did he have cast or something on?

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : Did they know that at the time or was that something the realized afterwards?

Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Van Ness played most of season with broken thumb

wpr (9-Apr) : yay

Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy says Steelers likely to protect Packers game. Meaning, no Ireland

Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Struggling to figure out what text editor options are needed and which are 'nice to have'

Mucky Tundra (8-Apr) : *CHOMP CHOMP CHOMP*

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : WR who said he'd break Xavier Worthy 40 time...and ran slower than you

Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Who?

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Texas’ WR Isaiah Bond is scheduled to visit the Bills, Browns, Chiefs, Falcons, Packers and Titans starting next week.

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Spotting ball isn't changing, only measuring distance is, Which wasn't the issue.

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : The spotting of the ball IS the issue. Not the chain gang.

Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Will there be a tracker on the ball or something?

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24

Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM

Eagles

10 - 22