Pack93z
15 years ago

I'm curious, since we all are clearly not happy with the 6-10 record last year, does anyone remember what FA's/players we were pushing for Thompson to go after and get in early 2008?

I remember one. Chris Simms. There was a ton of talk about how the Packers should get Simms. Where is that stellar QB right now? He lasted a year in Tennessee as a useless backup. Now he's riding the pine in Denver, and even with the Cutler fiasco, nobody wants to hand him the reins there, even temporarily.

"MassPackersFan" wrote:




Want some names...

Fernando Bryant
Boss Bailey
Micheal Boley
Warrick Dunn
Trent Green
Takeo Spikes
Joey Harrington
Duante Culpepper
Javon Kearse
David Carr
Alge Crumpler
Corey Smith
Lance Briggs
Astana Samuel...

They all had thread around the first couple weeks of FA last season... sorry didn't read through all threads for more names.. lol.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
15 years ago
Briggs would have been a difference maker. I don't think that was ever a possibility though, and it would have been a HUGE price tag.

Asante Samuel, good player but Tramon Williams' emergence proves (I think) that it wouldn't have had any effect except on our salary figures.

Maybe Kearse, with the Jenkins injury? I don't know though... he only had 3.5 sacks last year, i.e. 1 more sack than Montgomery, and many less tackles.

Maybe Takeo Spikes...

Certainly not Crumpler.
UserPostedImage
DakotaT
15 years ago


That's fine and I apologize for my cry baby comment, but here's a suggestion: create a subforum for Ted bashing so every thread in here doesn't get hijacked into the same boring argument. Then you mods can do your job and move these threads, and those of us who are fed up with the Ted bashing can easily ignore the topic.

"pack93z" wrote:



LOL.. Job.. I receive no compensation for anything related to this site or any other. Pure donation of time..

Apparently it really is that hard to accept that DH is a hardcore anti Ted believer and the majority of the forum is able to see both the good things Ted has accomplished here and some of the shortcomings of this team and try to talk sensibly to them.

I fail to understand both the hardcore Ted haters and those that take offense to the slightest bit of criticism towards the man.. he is man isn't he.

But I will agree that overall the entire freaking theme of debating the job Ted has done becomes tiresome and repugnant.

"DakotaT" wrote:




If you prefer duty or obligation for your moderator title, my apologies to your feelings. I am raising three blonde girls and believe me it's a job and there is no monetary compensation. :icon_smile:

As for the Tators, I will try to be more understanding to their fragile feelings as they defame our general manager.
UserPostedImage
dfosterf
15 years ago
Here's a little piece of perspective on perspective.

I submit that just about everyone here takes this whole Green Bay Packer thing real serious. Many of us assign various motivations to the decisions made by our front office, and we personalize and/or rationalize those decisions as we see fit.

Sometimes my initial reaction to a decision made by Ted (and co., btw) is:

WHAT IS HE THINKING!!!!!

Then I think to myself, What is he thinking?

This seems to calm me down on the whole Ted Thompson thing, more often than not.

I'm willing to bet that just about all of us would agree that if Ted Thompson (and co., btw) pull off a SuperBowl utilizing their present course of action...however unlikely some/all might think that to be...we would be:

A: Thrilled beyond imagination.

B: The most obnoxiously boisterous pack of know-it-alls on the internet.

(I can just hear us now..."And we didn't even TRY to BUY our Superbowl, unlike you assholes in [insert NFL city here]...well, at least that's how I would be :thumbleft: )
Cheesey
15 years ago

LOL.. Job.. I receive no compensation for anything related to this site or any other. Pure donation of time..

"vikesrule" wrote:




Very impressive 93z.....your volunteer work at the animal shelter is most commendable. ::wink:

"pack93z" wrote:


And i think your volunteer work at the soon to be "homeless shelter" (Purplepride.org) is quite commendable too!!! LOLOLOL!!!! :thumbleft:
UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
15 years ago

It's pretty much impossible to discuss Thompson's work without discussing Thompson.

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:



Exactly. Just like before TT, there was a lot of emotion, good or bad, towards Sherman's decisions. I was mad at Mike for punting on 4th and 1 which would have prevented the 4th and 26th. That was Mike's decision. I know it pained BF to not go for it. You could see it on his face.

On the flip side, he gave us one heck of an Offense.

The same goes for any decision, good or bad, that Ted Thompson makes. It affects the Packers and being Packer fans, we get all emo about it, good or bad.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Cheesey
15 years ago
Here's the way i see it with TT.
When i think he does well, i say so. When i think he screwed up, i say so.

I think what is missing with MANY of the posters is BALANCE.

NO ONE is going to get everything right. NOT ONE GM in the NFL does.
Those that seem to think Ted Thompson is "Matt Millen" are WAY off base. I also don't think Ted Thompson has reached the level of Ron Wolf yet, either. Although i think he has done better then many GM's, he's not the best.....yet. He may turn out to be so, or he may crash and burn. But fact is, it takes time to rebuild a team that has lost ALL it's players from the mid 1990's when we were so good.
I think this coming season will tell which way we are headed. But to act like Ted Thompson is an idiot because of last years record is insane. The defense and ST's let us down all season, where if you remember, the PREVIOUS season our D and ESPECIALLY ST's scored often to pull out close games. That was sorely missing last year, and it cost us MANY games.

And MM's conservative play calling cost us alot too. You have to have that "killer instinct" to finish off your opponent. And Mike McCarthy didn't have that last year. THAT needs to change.
UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
15 years ago


I'm willing to bet that just about all of us would agree that if Ted Thompson (and co., btw) pull off a SuperBowl utilizing their present course of action...however unlikely some/all might think that to be...we would be:

A: Thrilled beyond imagination.

"dfosterf" wrote:



I'd have a Ted Thompson & Mike McCarthy picture next to my BF action figures.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
15 years ago

NO ONE is going to get everything right. NOT ONE GM in the NFL does.
Those that seem to think Ted Thompson is "Matt Millen" are WAY off base. I also don't think Ted Thompson has reached the level of Ron Wolf yet, either.

"Cheesey" wrote:



I'd hazard to say that Ron Wolf wasn't Ron Wolf, if you get my drift...
UserPostedImage
15 years ago


I'm willing to bet that just about all of us would agree that if Ted Thompson (and co., btw) pull off a SuperBowl utilizing their present course of action...however unlikely some/all might think that to be...we would be:

A: Thrilled beyond imagination.

"zombieslayer" wrote:



I'd have a Ted Thompson & Mike McCarthy picture next to my Brett Favre action figures.

"dfosterf" wrote:



My Brett Favre action figure's arm fell off, and the cat keeps knocking it off the ledge. It refuses to take off like a jet. It just flutters to the ground like a wounded duck. I'd have to find a more fitting place.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (59m) : The Seattle Seahawks defeat the Chicago Bears 6-3. Jason Myers had 6 RBIs for Seattle while Cairo Santos had 3 RBI for Chicago
beast (1h) : Not nessarily, he might of been injured either way. He's playing about 50% of the games the last 4 years
Zero2Cool (8h) : If they'd been more patient with him, he'd be back already. Putting him out there vs Bears caused him to tweak it and here we are.
packerfanoutwest (8h) : well this is his last season with the PAck, book it
beast (9h) : Sounds like no Alexander (again), I'm wondering if his time with the Packers is done
Zero2Cool (16h) : Could ban beast and I still don't think anyone catches him.
Mucky Tundra (26-Dec) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore
packerfanoutwest (25-Dec) : Feliz Navidad!
Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!
beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

25-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Dec / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.