Show me how there's a winning recipe in there somewhere.
"Since69" wrote:
There isn't. We're just bored, and we're tired of seeing other teams/fans have all the "fun" of free agency.
I like the way Ted does it. Breaking the bank on one player only makes sense if your team is one player (and it has to be
that particular player) shy of winning it all. And we aren't. Would a premiere DT help? Sure... but what's the cost/benefit ratio if he's not the only piece missing from our puzzle?
Yeah, the big names get gobbled up immediately, but they all get way,
way overpaid, too. Really... how many FAs have been worth the money they've been paid in the last 5 years? Bet I could count them without taking my shoes off - and Woodson and Pickett would be two of them.
The sad truth is that free agency is almost as big a crapshoot as the draft. Maybe even more so. Free agents are usually on their second or third (or fourth) contract. At least if a draft pick doesn't pay dividends right away you can play the waiting game and hope he comes around. If Haynesworth doesn't make a difference in Washington (and I don't think he will), the 'Skins have wasted at least $41M.
"warhawk" wrote: