FA's Prediction· Page 3

bozz_2006
Registered

15 years ago

#21

I'm never surprised. period. (.)

Bigbyfan
Member

15 years ago

#22

At this point i will be happy to get just one guy that is worth talking about... we couldnt do much talking about frank walker and brandon chillar lol.

I have faith that the Packers will show interest in some of the big names, i just don't have that much faith in us landing those big names. Not because of TT, but because not many people choose a cold weather spot like Green Bay as their landing spot.

blank

blueleopard
Member

15 years ago

#23

Tampa is like the new Minnesota... except with our coaches. It makes sense to go for ex-Packers since they have Jagz and Bates now.

Danreb Victorio A Believer of Greg Jennings

Rockmolder
Honored Member

15 years ago

#24

Very wacky one. With our cap space, how about trading away one of our QBs. Ofcourse, we would have to get a good pick for them, but asuming both of them haven't shown anything.... what about Brohm for an early third and we either go with Flynn as our second QB or sign.... Grossman. Yes, Grossman.

I know alot of you don't like this guy, but with some good coaching, I think he can really be alot better. He has the arm and McCarthy can work with QBs. Now I don't want him to take over Rodgers, but he would make a good back-up if he pans out a bit better.

Ok, this is never gonna happen, since Brohm seems to have more upside so early in his career, but I really wish Grossman a better city and some good play.

On the other hand, I also though that Harrington could turn out pretty good if something like this would happen.

Since69
Registered

15 years ago

#25

+1 for Canty, if I get to "choose" my favorite. Obviously, I'd like Haynesworth, but i'm being realistic.

edit: and if he wants out of Dallas, that makes him just that much more attractive as a FA prospect.

"bozz_2006" wrote:

Haynesworth is a Redskin , but I'd certainly settle for Canty. Or Olshansky, for that matter. Both would be nice.

bozz_2006
Registered

15 years ago

#26

Yes, Grossman. He has the arm.

"Rockmolder" wrote:

heh

Rockmolder
Honored Member

15 years ago

#27

Yes, Grossman. He has the arm.

"bozz_2006" wrote:

heh

"Rockmolder" wrote:

And that's excactly what I'm talking about. He seems to be a somewhat smart guy. Not Aaron Rodgers smart, but also not Vince Young dumb. This is something that should be able to be coached out. Vision is quite important, but I also believe that it's quite learnable.

dhazer
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#28

Has anyone even heard of any players we are looking for?

Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)

bozz_2006
Registered

15 years ago

#29

nope.

LambeauEast
Rookie

15 years ago

#30

Every year around this time I get a lil down on Ted Thompson for not getting some big names, and spending big money. Then it dawns on me that he could be that bozo in Washington who spends truck loads of money EVERY year....and STILL, nothing to show for it!

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (14m) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (22m) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (34m) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (1h) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (1h) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (1h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (1h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (1h) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (1h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (3h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (3h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (3h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (3h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (4h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (4h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (4h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (4h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (4h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (4h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (4h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (4h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (4h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (4h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (4h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (4h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (4h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (4h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (4h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (4h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (4h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (4h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (4h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (4h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

packerfanoutwest (5h) : falcons are already ahead of us

beast (5h) : Packers will get in

beast (5h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen

packerfanoutwest (5h) : they still are in the playoffs

packerfanoutwest (5h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7

Zero2Cool (6h) : We can say it. We don't play.

Mucky Tundra (8h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints

Mucky Tundra (8h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games

Mucky Tundra (8h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.

buckeyepackfan (8h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.

Mucky Tundra (17h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan

beast (18h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings

bboystyle (18h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in

Mucky Tundra (21h) : Or ties, but let's be real here

Mucky Tundra (21h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses

Mucky Tundra (21h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch

buckeyepackfan (21h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS