Zero2Cool
15 years ago
I think Ted should be given a little credit for retaining Kampman, Harris, and Driver as well, not to mention drafting Aaron Rodgers who thus far seems like a solid pick.

I'm one of those who's hard on Ted for not making a splash in FA, but I don't want him gone because of it. I also see that you can't turn dust piles into gold nuggets no matter how much money you spend. Sometimes players just don't fit your mold or simply go else where because someone extremely over paid.

I really can't think of any player that was signed as a FA that I wish we would have matched the same dollar for dollar contract. Hell, some are still pissed off Ahman Green left.
UserPostedImage
dhazer
15 years ago

I don't remember the last big name guy the Steelers signed, and the Packers have signed bigger names and yet Ted Thompson get's killed by some people for not doing enough in FA.

"Cheesey" wrote:



Well just how do you have to change when you win 2 Super Bowls in 4 years compared to having 1 winning season in that same time span?

You call the likes of Donald Lee, Chillar, Williams, and Kuhn as bigger names than what the Steelers did ? How many of those 4 will be starters this year? I think its probably going to be 0. Woodson noone else wanted so we got him by default.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

Why no mention of Charles Woodson or Ryan Pickett?

"dhazer" wrote:


(SHHHH!!! You'll RUIN his argument!!!!) :thumbleft: LOL!!!




SHHHHHHHHH don't tell Zero i did mention Woodson we got him by default because were the the only team that would let him play cb 😛. Everyone else wanted him at saftey as he even stated in his interviews that have been posted on this site.
Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
15 years ago

SHHHHHHHHH don't tell Zero i did mention Woodson we got him by default because were the the only team that would let him play cb 😛. Everyone else wanted him at saftey as he even stated in his interviews that have been posted on this site.

"dhazer" wrote:

Unfortunately for you I actually know facts and Safety played little to no effect in his decision. It came to MONEY, he said it himself. And yes those very interviews say MONEY was his reasoning. Remember, he did play safety just this last year for us. He's also said that he'd play whatever position needed to HELP the team.

We did not get him by default. Stop being a douche and give Ted credit. If Ted didn't shell out big dollars for a player many assumed was over the hill and injury prone we wouldn't have him. Ted took a chance (wish he'd do it a little more often) and it paid off HUGE.

So keep your 'default' comments away from our intelligent discussion please. Thank you.
UserPostedImage
bozz_2006
15 years ago
heh
UserPostedImage
Ya say the word "default" one more time, I kill ya!
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
15 years ago
lmao
UserPostedImage
shield4life
15 years ago

lmao

"Zero2Cool" wrote:


LMAO
Glad To Be A Packers Fan.
doddpower
15 years ago

lmao

"krazygangsta" wrote:


LMAO

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



You get hazer Zero!!


Geeez, someone at least has a little intelligence around here.

+1
longtimefan
15 years ago
since this topic has been derailed ::roll: thought this might be a read

http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/2009/02/peppers-confirms-he-wants-out-of-carolina/ 

For those who were hoping Julius Peppers would have a sudden change of heart about his desire to leave the Carolina Panthers, forget about it.

In a sideline interview during the second quarter of the Pro Bowl, Peppers told NBCs Tiki Barber he wants out. Peppers wasnt nearly as eloquent as his agent, Carl Carey, who came out several weeks ago and said the defensive end wants to go to another team.

I just feel its time to move on, Peppers said.

Cheesey
15 years ago

heh
UserPostedImage
Ya say the word "default" one more time, I kill ya!

"bozz_2006" wrote:


I say your post wins........(by default!!!) :thumbleft: LOLOL!!!
UserPostedImage
RaiderPride
15 years ago

Look I'm not saying Brooks is Lechler, I'm just saying if Brooks returns to his SR. year stats than he could be a better value in the short term and be around a lot long than Lechler.

"beast" wrote:



I beg to differ. We are talking about a punter here, not a corner back.

Let's say Ted gives him a five year contract. He will be 37 when his contract is over.

Shane has played 8 years. He is a baby with eight years behind him as a punter. That is nothing for a top rated punter. The best punters, that are proven, last way beyond that.

Ray Guy retired at 37 and he was still booming them. Jeff Feagles... Last year was his 21st in the NFL. Sean Landeta played 19 years... I could go on and on.

Shane is special. I would say he he should be a major target for Ted to bring to Green Bay in F.A. It would be a brilliant move, and the Packers would not have to worry about that position for the next five years.

Punters are so important in the NFC North.

R.P.
""People Will Probably Never Remember What You Said, And May Never Remember What You Did. However, People Will Always Remember How You Made Them Feel."
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (10m) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (19m) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (30m) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (1h) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (1h) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (1h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (1h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (1h) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (1h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (2h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (2h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (3h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (3h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (4h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (4h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (4h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (4h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (4h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (4h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (4h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (4h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (4h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (4h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (4h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (4h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (4h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (4h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (4h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (4h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
packerfanoutwest (4h) : falcons are already ahead of us
beast (5h) : Packers will get in
beast (5h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
packerfanoutwest (5h) : they still are in the playoffs
packerfanoutwest (5h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
Zero2Cool (6h) : We can say it. We don't play.
Mucky Tundra (8h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
Mucky Tundra (8h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
Mucky Tundra (8h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
buckeyepackfan (8h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
Mucky Tundra (17h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (18h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
bboystyle (18h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
buckeyepackfan (21h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
7m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

3h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.