bigfog
15 years ago
So if all this is true - does Green Bay still grab Orakapo in the first? Or does he not really fit? I'll admit, I'm not familiar at all with the requirements of the 3-4, so thanks for posting that guide, wils0646.
"I wouldn't root for the Minnesota Vikings to win a chess match against Nazi Germany."
go.pack.go.
15 years ago
I do think we should still get Orakpo if he is there in the draft and we are a 3-4 defense. He is said to be able to be a hybrid DE/LB in the NFL.
UserPostedImage
porky88
15 years ago

I do think we should still get Orakpo if he is there in the draft and we are a 3-4 defense. He is said to be able to be a hybrid DE/LB in the NFL.

"go.pack.go." wrote:



Yeah, but with Cincinnati and Cleveland picking ahead of Green Bay it's going to be tough.

I think Everett Brown of Florida State is even more likely right now. He'd be a nice fit. If Aaron Maybin comes out then that could bump Brian Orakpo down to Green Bay. Jerry Hughes of TCU is another excellent "tweener"

This draft is loaded with them.

I read on nationalfootballpost that the Packers are committed to turning to a 3-4 team so take that for what it's worth. It came from Michael Lombardi. Might of been posted, but worth noting either way since they've been on top of the story.
go.pack.go.
15 years ago
I wish I heard the same stuff Michael Lombardi hears...and who he hears it from. It isn't official that we will be a 3-4 team year, so don't everybody panic.
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
15 years ago
They also said he is going to keep it a 4-3, and over time change it over.
So it won't be an instant change.
UserPostedImage
MattG04
15 years ago
With all of the joy and happiness going around here, I thought it was time to rain on the parade! Ha! Only kidding, well kind of. I do not want Nolan in Green Bay, and heres why.
Everyone complained this past year and the year before for that matter, that we did not blitz enough, unfortunately, with Nolan that won't change either, he runs a vanilla scheme and plays defense not to lose, just like Bob Sanders. I have been forced to watch niner games extensively because my roommate is a huge niner fan and we don't usually get the Packer games here.
His "Base" defense is a 3-4 but by the 2nd half it usually turns into a 2-4-5 Nickel Package with no blitzing whatsoever. If we want another Sanders here bring him in, but I want 'change' in Green Bay, not more of the same.
Wow I sound like an Obama supporter during the election, and I wasn't one!
I believe we need someone who is willing to bring pressure and create big plays, yeah its a gamble and gives up big plays but you gotta gamble on defense, and I believe Nolan is afraid to pull the trigger.
blank
Cheesey
15 years ago
Well....according to what i heard.....it's a done deal already.
UserPostedImage
longtimefan
15 years ago
you are aware we have [strike]5[/strike] 7 pages here?

http://packershome.com/index.php?name=ForumsPro&file=viewtopic&t=3333 
toronto_cheesehead
15 years ago

I do think we should still get Orakpo if he is there in the draft and we are a 3-4 defense. He is said to be able to be a hybrid DE/LB in the NFL.

"porky88" wrote:



Yeah, but with Cincinnati and Cleveland picking ahead of Green Bay it's going to be tough.

I think Everett Brown of Florida State is even more likely right now. He'd be a nice fit. If Aaron Maybin comes out then that could bump Brian Orakpo down to Green Bay. Jerry Hughes of TCU is another excellent "tweener"

This draft is loaded with them.

I read on nationalfootballpost that the Packers are committed to turning to a 3-4 team so take that for what it's worth. It came from Michael Lombardi. Might of been posted, but worth noting either way since they've been on top of the story.

"go.pack.go." wrote:



We should be able to find a tweener with ease if we go to a 3-4. I think the guy we need to target though is Terrence Cody out of 'Bama. If he declares he'd be an ideal nose for the defense, and we could kick Pickett and Jolly out to the 5 technique. If we're gonna keep some 4-3 looks then Jenkins can stay, but if not, I'm sure there's a Tampa 2 team out there that would love to have him as an under tackle. Kampman (as much as we love him) would have monster trade value too. 4-3 ends go for a premium is this league, and if we're going to a 3-4 then we should try to get a king's ransom for Kampman to help retool the defense. Barnett likely has to leave too, although (unlike a lot of ppl here), I think Hawk can play ILB in a 34.

Should be a fun offseason if we do switch schemes on defense.
blank
go.pack.go.
15 years ago
Just to let you know, he wasn't the DC in San Fran, he was the HC.
UserPostedImage
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    Zero2Cool (9m) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
    beast (17m) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
    packerfanoutwest (29m) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
    Zero2Cool (1h) : I see what you did there Mucky
    Zero2Cool (1h) : dammit. 3:25pm
    Zero2Cool (1h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
    Mucky Tundra (1h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
    Mucky Tundra (1h) : Yeah baby!
    Zero2Cool (1h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
    Zero2Cool (2h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
    beast (2h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
    Zero2Cool (3h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
    Zero2Cool (3h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
    packerfanoutwest (4h) : ok I stand corrected
    Zero2Cool (4h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
    Zero2Cool (4h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
    beast (4h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
    beast (4h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
    Zero2Cool (4h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
    beast (4h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
    beast (4h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
    beast (4h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
    Zero2Cool (4h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
    Zero2Cool (4h) : I literally just said it.
    packerfanoutwest (4h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
    Zero2Cool (4h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
    Zero2Cool (4h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
    packerfanoutwest (4h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
    Zero2Cool (4h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
    packerfanoutwest (4h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
    packerfanoutwest (4h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
    packerfanoutwest (4h) : if bucs win out they win their division
    beast (4h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
    packerfanoutwest (4h) : falcons are already ahead of us
    beast (5h) : Packers will get in
    beast (5h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
    packerfanoutwest (5h) : they still are in the playoffs
    packerfanoutwest (5h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
    Zero2Cool (6h) : We can say it. We don't play.
    Mucky Tundra (8h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
    Mucky Tundra (8h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
    Mucky Tundra (8h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
    buckeyepackfan (8h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
    Mucky Tundra (17h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
    beast (18h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
    bboystyle (18h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
    Mucky Tundra (21h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
    Mucky Tundra (21h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
    Mucky Tundra (21h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
    buckeyepackfan (21h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
    Vikings
    Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
    BEARS
    Recent Topics
    5m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    3h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

    19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.