wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
2 years ago
Green Bay has the #22 pick overall Value 780
#28 Value 680
#53 Value 370
#59 Value 310

Would you package any of them to move up in the draft?

#7 value is 1500.

PFF board:
7. Evan Neal OT Alabama
8. Trent McDuffie CB Washington
9. Ahmad Gardner CB Cincinnati
10. George Karlaftis EDGE Purdue
11. Drake London WR USC
12. Garrett Wilson WR OSU

We don't need another CB at this time. A 1st and a 2nd will get you up to about #13. I don't see everyone of the players gone at 13.
There are some decent players lower in the draft too. Getting 4 in the first two rounds will be awesome. But I am not opposed to landing an elite top 10 guy.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
2 years ago
I'd package one of my 1st rounders with 4th round compensatory pick to get into the top 10-15 and take the best available player per my scouting.
UserPostedImage
beast
2 years ago
I might trade up, but not that far, actually this draft is unusual and seems deep with mid-1st round talents ...

So maybe trade up the #28 pick to get in the early 20s if there is someone specific you want...

Otherwise I'd be using later picks to move higher in the 2nd trying to get some of players that maybe wouldn't normally drop out of the late 1st and early 2nd but dropped a bit further this year.


There are so many freaking edge rushers, some of them will have to drop.


But in the 1st round (since that's what you were asking about), there are some dominant lineman, I might target if the team loved their for into the scheme.

Georgia certainly has a couple of defensive linemen, three that might be going first round.

George Karlaftis has a ton of snaps under his belt, he doesn't come off the field basically and still plays at a high level even with a high snap count.

North Carolina State has an extremely powerful OT, which might be a great LG or RT (wherever you aren't putting Jenkins).
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
2 years ago
There would have to be someone I REALLY wanted in order to even consider trading up.
2 first round picks is something they haven't had for awhile.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
2 years ago

There would have to be someone I REALLY wanted in order to even consider trading up.
2 first round picks is something they haven't had for awhile.

Originally Posted by: Cheesey 



2019
Rashan Gary
Darnell Savage

😉😂
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
2 years ago

I'd package one of my 1st rounders with 4th round compensatory pick to get into the top 10-15 and take the best available player per my scouting.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



BAHAHAHA! I wish.

If you package the 22nd and the 140th picks you can move up to #21. Package the 28th and 140th you move up to 26th.

I have no problem keeping the 4 picks and loading up with solid players. But if there is that one stud still left on the board at 8-12 would it be worth it to only get 3 players in the first two rounds instead of 4?

As Beast points out there are a few linemen both offense and defensive that are interesting. Elite players who step up in key situations are worth a lot more than 2 very good players. Think about how many times Reggie White came blasting in and sacked the QB late in the 4th quarter to seal a game. He didn't do it every week but when it mattered most, he was there. In turn, Clay Matthews, who was a solid player was a step or two late to get to the QB and often the throw was completed for a big gain.

I don't know enough about any college player to say they need to go get him at 10 or 12 or whatever. Again, what I have read is the draft is deep with good and very good players but it is short on elite talent.

On April 28th be sure to tune in early. Green Bay may see someone they like sitting there and they may make a move.
UserPostedImage
2 years ago
The only one I would trade up for is London, the USC wide receiver. Otherwise I would see what’s there and take the best wide receiver available… of course subject to not signing some free-agent wide receivers.
Go Packers!!!!
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
2 years ago

The only one I would trade up for is London, the USC wide receiver. Otherwise I would see what’s there and take the best wide receiver available… of course subject to not signing some free-agent wide receivers.

Originally Posted by: Martha Careful 



Keep in mind the list I provided is PFF's. Other Big Boards have other players listed. Which leads me to believe there are more "very good" players and fewer "elite" players. Plus there is the QB factor. Teams have shown a willingness to take a QB earlier than their value. That means someone is going to fall. Other teams will swoon over the CBs (I hope so.) and thus push prospects down.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
2 years ago
Matt Ryan looks like to be a Colt before end of tomorrow -- per rumors.

Falcons get
Packers 28th overall (660)
QB Jordan Love

Packers get
Falcons 8th overall (1,400)

Based on DrafTek  valuation, this is saying Jordan Love is basically worth 24th overall pick. (Love was drafted 26th overall in 2020)

That being said, Packers probably have to trade the 22nd overall (780) pick instead of 28th. That would then value Love at 30th overall value.

UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
2 years ago

Matt Ryan looks like to be a Colt before end of tomorrow -- per rumors.

Falcons get
Packers 28th overall (660)
QB Jordan Love

Packers get
Falcons 8th overall (1,400)

Based on DrafTek  valuation, this is saying Jordan Love is basically worth 24th overall pick. (Love was drafted 26th overall in 2020)

That being said, Packers probably have to trade the 22nd overall (780) pick instead of 28th. That would then value Love at 30th overall value.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Not the 22nd pick. I will accept giving up the 28th. Love has been in the league for 2 seasons. That makes him "worth" the difference in value between the 22nd and 28th.

UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (2h) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (2h) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (5h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (5h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (5h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (5h) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (5h) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (5h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (5h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (5h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (6h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (7h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (7h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (7h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (7h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (7h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (8h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (8h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (8h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (9h) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (9h) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (9h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (9h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (9h) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (9h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (10h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (10h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (11h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (11h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (12h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (12h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (12h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (12h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (12h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (12h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (12h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (12h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (12h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (12h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (12h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (12h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (12h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (12h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (12h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (12h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (12h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (12h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (12h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (12h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

11h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.