Scenarios Packers can acquire Khahil Mack· Page 8

Announcement PH Beta → Check it out! Click Me! (you might be see "unsafe", but it is safe)

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

6 years ago

I am stumped on why everyone is saying the Bears will be bottom feeders?

Originally Posted by: dhazer

Who's saying the Bears are going to be bottom feeders? You said everyone, and I know I never said it.

They made plenty of moves in the off season and to me they will have a tough defense. We still have a weak defense and one qb hit away from getting the #1 overall pick. Rodgers has been injury prone the last few years and I still say it was a huge mistake to sign him to the huge contract. Make him play out his contract and most of all show me he is past his injury.

Originally Posted by: dhazer

Bears were in top 10 in scored against (I think) and this is going to make their defense better, so will the LB Roquan Smith. Their OL and QB are still flaws. They need a QB who doesn't lose them the game. They don't need the QB to win the game with that defense, they just need to be efficient. I wouldn't be surprised if the Bears finish ahead of Lions in the division.

I just don't think this is a good long-term deal for a team like the Bears. Then again, I didn't see the Rams turning Jared Goff into performing like he did last season.

sschind
Senior Member

6 years ago

#72

I am stumped on why everyone is saying the Bears will be bottom feeders? They made plenty of moves in the off season and to me they will have a tough defense. We still have a weak defense and one qb hit away from getting the #1 overall pick. Rodgers has been injury prone the last few years and I still say it was a huge mistake to sign him to the huge contract. Make him play out his contract and most of all show me he is past his injury.

Originally Posted by: dhazer

I agree with the Bears part of your post. It is my opinion that half the Packers fans would be praising their off season moves and pegging them for the playoffs if they were in any other division. Its the rivalry that is fueling most of the "The Bears Still Suck" mentality. They should have a very good defense. Their front 7 at least, I am not that familiar with their secondary other than Fuller.

If you look at the off season acquisitions they made it look pretty damn good and I would be willing to bet most of the Trubisky hate is fueled by the fact that he is a Bear and nothing more. Some Packers fans simply hate the Bears so no matter what they do those fans will spin it negatively.

I disagree on the Rodgers aspect. Making him play out the last two years would have been very risky and I honestly am not worried about his shoulder.

sschind
Senior Member

6 years ago

#73

Who's saying the Bears are going to be bottom feeders? You said everyone, and I know I never said it.

Bears were in top 10 in scored against (I think) and this is going to make their defense better, so will the LB Roquan Smith. Their OL and QB are still flaws. They need a QB who doesn't lose them the game. They don't need the QB to win the game with that defense, they just need to be efficient. I wouldn't be surprised if the Bears finish ahead of Lions in the division.

I just don't think this is a good long-term deal for a team like the Bears. Then again, I didn't see the Rams turning Jared Goff into performing like he did last season.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

I think the Bears will finish ahead of the Lions this year. I just hope the Lions get behind early in all their games because I'll need Stafford to get me those garbage time fantasy points.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

6 years ago

#74

sschind
Senior Member

6 years ago

#75

Good deal for the Bears I'd say knowing they get the second rounder back.

beast
Select Member

6 years ago

#76

Good deal for the Bears I'd say knowing they get the second rounder back.

Originally Posted by: sschind

Yeah I see it almost as two different trades in one.

Khalil Mack for two 1st round picks. (Raiders win)

Then
Raiders 2nd for 3rd and 6th (Bears win)

Overall, I think it means the Raiders got a tad less than two 1st round picks value for Mack

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

6 years ago

#77

Yikes

gbguy20
Veteran Member

6 years ago

#78

People thinking we can support Rodgers and macks contracts and still field a competitive team at other positions is crazy

BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.

KRK
Veteran Member

6 years ago

#79

Sorry, there is no way in hell I would give more than 2 #1's. In fact, I don't think they should have offered that much. Lets hope our offensive line holds up and our improved defensive personnel and coaching are enough.

In Luce tua Videmus Lucem KRK

beast
Select Member

6 years ago

#80

I'm not sure I believe the Packers offered a straight up two 1st round picks... maybe something like the Bears, where there is two 1st round picks, but they also get something more than Mack back.

But sounds like the Raiders didn't believe any defensive player was worth $20 million per year and they wanted someone who could potentially have a top 16 pick next year... and felt like the Bears had a better chance of that, than their other offers.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (4m) : I guess 3 games. Whatever

Zero2Cool (18m) : Bleh, that only impacts two games.

Zero2Cool (25m) : Packers are gonna get 3rd place division schedule next year.

Mucky Tundra (1h) : Kanata, seek help! lol

beast (3h) : I was rooting for the Bears to win and hurt their draft pick status

Zero2Cool (3h) : Forgot there was even a game last night haha

TheKanataThrilla (3h) : That was terrible.

TheKanataThrilla (3h) : Watching that game in its entirety yesterday is proof positive that I am a football addict.

beast (4h) : And horrible time management multiple times... and not being able to score more than 3 points on a team with talent

beast (4h) : Realizing the Bears didn't fix it from the previous week and do the same thing, getting the game to overtime

beast (4h) : They probably are not tanking, but they've absolutely mismanagement some things, such as Vikings seeing the Packers blocked FG and realizing

Zero2Cool (5h) : Crazy of Bears to have that mindset that is

Zero2Cool (5h) : Hail Mary stop away from 5 - 2. Not sure how that flips to tanking. Crazy mindset if true

beast (5h) : I've quietly questioned if Bears are tanking on purpose... they suddenly got a lot worse with some simple concepts like 101 clock management

wpr (8h) : Watching bares fans melt down over how putrid their team is, so enjoyable. It's the gift that keeps on giving.

Mucky Tundra (15h) : The Seattle Seahawks defeat the Chicago Bears 6-3. Jason Myers had 6 RBIs for Seattle while Cairo Santos had 3 RBI for Chicago

beast (16h) : Not nessarily, he might of been injured either way. He's playing about 50% of the games the last 4 years

Zero2Cool (22h) : If they'd been more patient with him, he'd be back already. Putting him out there vs Bears caused him to tweak it and here we are.

packerfanoutwest (22h) : well this is his last season with the PAck, book it

beast (26-Dec) : Sounds like no Alexander (again), I'm wondering if his time with the Packers is done

Zero2Cool (26-Dec) : Could ban beast and I still don't think anyone catches him.

Mucky Tundra (26-Dec) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore

packerfanoutwest (25-Dec) : Feliz Navidad!

Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!

beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁

beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won

Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS