What the 1st round draft says about the Aaron Rodgers contract· Page 2

dyeah_gb
Member Topic Starter

6 years ago

Please stop this moronic post , the packers aren’t getting rid of the best player in the nfl , theres no way in hell to get Rosen as he will be taken in the first 4-5 picks, Aaron wants to play until he’s close to 40 if he’s able, they have 2 capable backups, even though if Aaron goes it would be almost impossible to make a playoff run, that goes for about 75% of all teams !!

Originally Posted by: nyrpack

What is moronic about my post besides that you don't like it? I laid out multiple reasons that support the possibility of looking to pickup the next franchise QB in the first round of the draft. You provide a bunch of assumptions and even add some of your own to my post as I never said to get rid of Rogers but to not overpay for his new his contract.

I was however wrong about the length of the current contract. It is even better that it is two years and not one. That will give a QB two years to develop under Rogers instead of one.

The first principle is that you must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool - R. Feynman

gbguy20
Veteran Member

6 years ago

#12

Left side. Strong side.

BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.

Cheesey
Preferred Member

6 years ago

#13

I can’t believe the people that want to get rid of AR.
Look at how many “can’t miss” QBs in the first round the last 30 years MISSED!
So give up one of the best QBs in the NFL for an unknown college kid....geez.
I can see getting one for the future, but to trade Rodgers, when he most likely has 3 or 4 good years left seems stupid to me.

nerdmann
Premier Member

6 years ago

#14

Originally Posted by: dyeah_gb

They've got Kizer.

I mean, they don't need the best ever, what they need is a dominating defense and someone better than Kirk Cousins. That said, I do like the way you think.

See how Kizer comes along, squeeze another year out of Aaron, then trade him next year.

[youtube]

[/youtbe]

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

buckeyepackfan
Veteran Member

6 years ago

#15

The question isn't do you keep Aaron Rodgers.
Of course you keep him.

The REAL question is does Aaron Rodgers want to stay in Green Bay?

Ted Thompson not gone but not in charge.
Qb coach gone.
Jordy gone.
Aaron not happy, not good.
Those of you who don't want to pay him (right now it seems the new GM is on that list), are dead wrong.
Either pay the man or get rid of him now.

Any other choice and you WILL have another Brett Favre scenario.

Could be Aaron is quite content to play out his contract and move on in 2 years, if so that's square on the head if the new GM!.

I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

6 years ago

#16

Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan

I've read and listened to the interviews by Aaron Rodgers. He is not unhappy and if he is, he's done an amazing job at masking it. This is the off-season, the time when people who need clicks and page views extrapolate mountains from anthills. Stop acting like this is the first time Aaron Rodgers has lost a WR he liked or a QB coach he liked. Aaron is one of the smartest football players I've listened to and followed. He clearly knows this is a business. Yes, he's not jumping for joy, but shit, he is still talking to Jordy, he still spends time with him. Just because you change JOBS doesn't mean you stop being friends with someone.

If there is a QB at 14 that the Packers absolutely love, then you take him. Aaron is 34 years old and while I think he has a handful of top 5 QB play, we're not exactly one starter away from a Super Bowl. If someone like Josh Rosen (21 years old) is there at 14 and the Packers feel they he's the next in line at QB, you draft him. This is no different than 2005. You take the best player available.

And for the record, I would be pissed if we lost Rodgers, but I understand the Packers are a franchise, a business and they are going to be around much longer than Rodgers and the future has to be considered.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

6 years ago

#17

Originally Posted by: dyeah_gb

Just wanted to say thank you for not resorting to name-calling as which was WRONGFULLY done to you.

People, disagree with the post, no need for the childish stuff.

Smokey
Veteran Member

6 years ago

#18

laughing 101.jpg You have insufficient rights to see the content.

This is funny stuff, keep posting please !

🤣

nyrpack
Veteran Member

6 years ago

#19

i do apologize for the term moronic, that said, why would you waste the # 14 pick overall on a qb, rodgers will be here for at least 4-6 yrs barring injury, my philosphy is if brady and manning can do it so can aaron, the packers need defense, they need young cbs and linebackers desperately, thats your # 1 concern, you said rosen will be a great selection , theres no way he gets past pick # 5-6 , i dont know why anybody would think aaron would be over paid, cousins just got a mega deal and hes the 3rd best qb out there, not in the nfl but in a 4 team division, so aaron would be worth the huge contract. get this guy some winners that could play to his level, if they did this the packers and rodgers would have about 2-3 more superbowls under there belt !! bottom line hes not going anywhere and this team goes no where without him ..

jimmy b.

DoddPower
Veteran Member

6 years ago

#20

This would only make sense if the Packers truly feel another HOF QB drops to them. That would be hard to pass up in any draft, especially with an aging QB. Aaron Rodgers is proof that young QBs can sit behind veterans for three years and enjoy great success. Would it make sense to pass on the next Aaron Rodgers for BJ Raji, even if you currently have an aging Aaron Rodgers? Of course not. But if there is any doubt in the QB that drops, it would be best to take the best available player or trade down and possibly draft the QB later if they become the best available player. Ultimately, the Packers need as many good players as they can find, largely regardless of position.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

beast (38m) : Eagles sure get a lot of fumbles on kickoffs

Mucky Tundra (43m) : This game looks too big for Washington

packerfanoutwest (4h) : that being said, The Ravens are the Browns

packerfanoutwest (4h) : Browns, Dolphins have longest AFC Championship droughts

packerfanoutwest (4h) : As of today, Cowboys have longest NFC Championship drought,

beast (14h) : Someone pointed out, with Raiders hiring Carroll, the division games between Carroll and Jim Harbaugh are back on (who can whine more games)

beast (20h) : I'm confused, Pete Carroll and Brian Schottenheimer? When Todd Monken, Joe Brady, Kellen Moore, Kliff Kingsbury and Zac Robinson are availab

Zero2Cool (22h) : Any reason I'm catching a shot here about my intelligence?

Martha Careful (25-Jan) : thank you Mucky for sticking up for me

Martha Careful (25-Jan) : some of those people are smarter than you zero. However Pete Carroll is not

Mucky Tundra (24-Jan) : Rude!

beast (24-Jan) : Martha? 😋

Zero2Cool (24-Jan) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.

dfosterf (24-Jan) : I'm going with a combination of the two.

beast (24-Jan) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC

Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no

Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.

beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?

beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you

wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.

wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.

wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.

Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down

Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious

beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere

beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.

beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?

Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.

beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...

beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered

wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.

wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.

wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.

Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?

Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24

Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM

Eagles

10 - 22