What the 1st round draft says about the Aaron Rodgers contract· Page 2

dyeah_gb
Member Topic Starter

6 years ago

Please stop this moronic post , the packers aren’t getting rid of the best player in the nfl , theres no way in hell to get Rosen as he will be taken in the first 4-5 picks, Aaron wants to play until he’s close to 40 if he’s able, they have 2 capable backups, even though if Aaron goes it would be almost impossible to make a playoff run, that goes for about 75% of all teams !!

Originally Posted by: nyrpack

What is moronic about my post besides that you don't like it? I laid out multiple reasons that support the possibility of looking to pickup the next franchise QB in the first round of the draft. You provide a bunch of assumptions and even add some of your own to my post as I never said to get rid of Rogers but to not overpay for his new his contract.

I was however wrong about the length of the current contract. It is even better that it is two years and not one. That will give a QB two years to develop under Rogers instead of one.

The first principle is that you must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool - R. Feynman

gbguy20
Veteran Member

6 years ago

#12

Left side. Strong side.

BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.

Cheesey
Preferred Member

6 years ago

#13

I can’t believe the people that want to get rid of AR.
Look at how many “can’t miss” QBs in the first round the last 30 years MISSED!
So give up one of the best QBs in the NFL for an unknown college kid....geez.
I can see getting one for the future, but to trade Rodgers, when he most likely has 3 or 4 good years left seems stupid to me.

nerdmann
Premier Member

6 years ago

#14

Originally Posted by: dyeah_gb

They've got Kizer.

I mean, they don't need the best ever, what they need is a dominating defense and someone better than Kirk Cousins. That said, I do like the way you think.

See how Kizer comes along, squeeze another year out of Aaron, then trade him next year.

[youtube]

[/youtbe]

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

buckeyepackfan
Veteran Member

6 years ago

#15

The question isn't do you keep Aaron Rodgers.
Of course you keep him.

The REAL question is does Aaron Rodgers want to stay in Green Bay?

Ted Thompson not gone but not in charge.
Qb coach gone.
Jordy gone.
Aaron not happy, not good.
Those of you who don't want to pay him (right now it seems the new GM is on that list), are dead wrong.
Either pay the man or get rid of him now.

Any other choice and you WILL have another Brett Favre scenario.

Could be Aaron is quite content to play out his contract and move on in 2 years, if so that's square on the head if the new GM!.

I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

6 years ago

#16

Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan

I've read and listened to the interviews by Aaron Rodgers. He is not unhappy and if he is, he's done an amazing job at masking it. This is the off-season, the time when people who need clicks and page views extrapolate mountains from anthills. Stop acting like this is the first time Aaron Rodgers has lost a WR he liked or a QB coach he liked. Aaron is one of the smartest football players I've listened to and followed. He clearly knows this is a business. Yes, he's not jumping for joy, but shit, he is still talking to Jordy, he still spends time with him. Just because you change JOBS doesn't mean you stop being friends with someone.

If there is a QB at 14 that the Packers absolutely love, then you take him. Aaron is 34 years old and while I think he has a handful of top 5 QB play, we're not exactly one starter away from a Super Bowl. If someone like Josh Rosen (21 years old) is there at 14 and the Packers feel they he's the next in line at QB, you draft him. This is no different than 2005. You take the best player available.

And for the record, I would be pissed if we lost Rodgers, but I understand the Packers are a franchise, a business and they are going to be around much longer than Rodgers and the future has to be considered.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

6 years ago

#17

Originally Posted by: dyeah_gb

Just wanted to say thank you for not resorting to name-calling as which was WRONGFULLY done to you.

People, disagree with the post, no need for the childish stuff.

Smokey
Veteran Member

6 years ago

#18

laughing 101.jpg You have insufficient rights to see the content.

This is funny stuff, keep posting please !

🤣

nyrpack
Veteran Member

6 years ago

#19

i do apologize for the term moronic, that said, why would you waste the # 14 pick overall on a qb, rodgers will be here for at least 4-6 yrs barring injury, my philosphy is if brady and manning can do it so can aaron, the packers need defense, they need young cbs and linebackers desperately, thats your # 1 concern, you said rosen will be a great selection , theres no way he gets past pick # 5-6 , i dont know why anybody would think aaron would be over paid, cousins just got a mega deal and hes the 3rd best qb out there, not in the nfl but in a 4 team division, so aaron would be worth the huge contract. get this guy some winners that could play to his level, if they did this the packers and rodgers would have about 2-3 more superbowls under there belt !! bottom line hes not going anywhere and this team goes no where without him ..

jimmy b.

DoddPower
Veteran Member

6 years ago

#20

This would only make sense if the Packers truly feel another HOF QB drops to them. That would be hard to pass up in any draft, especially with an aging QB. Aaron Rodgers is proof that young QBs can sit behind veterans for three years and enjoy great success. Would it make sense to pass on the next Aaron Rodgers for BJ Raji, even if you currently have an aging Aaron Rodgers? Of course not. But if there is any doubt in the QB that drops, it would be best to take the best available player or trade down and possibly draft the QB later if they become the best available player. Ultimately, the Packers need as many good players as they can find, largely regardless of position.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (2h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (2h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (2h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (2h) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (2h) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (2h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (2h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (2h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (3h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (3h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (3h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (3h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (3h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (4h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (4h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (4h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (4h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (5h) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (5h) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (5h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (5h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (5h) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (6h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (7h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (7h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (8h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (8h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (8h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (8h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (8h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (8h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (8h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (8h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (8h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (8h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (8h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (8h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (8h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (8h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (8h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (8h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (8h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (8h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (8h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (9h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (9h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (9h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

packerfanoutwest (9h) : falcons are already ahead of us

beast (9h) : Packers will get in

beast (9h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS