sschind
6 years ago

I constantly hear people say that our #1 QB won't execute the offense so why does it matter if our #2 doesn't either? 😝

Originally Posted by: Porforis 



True but when your #1 QB has talent like ours does he can get away with it.

Cheesey
6 years ago
WPR, the point I was trying to make was, Hundley obviously wasn't getting the job done, so why NOT shake things up and give ANYTHING ELSE a try?
It doesn't seem Cobb could have been much worse.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
6 years ago

WPR, the point I was trying to make was, Hundley obviously wasn't getting the job done, so why NOT shake things up and give ANYTHING ELSE a try?
It doesn't seem Cobb could have been much worse.

Originally Posted by: Cheesey 



For the same reason they didn't use Callahan. As bad as he was, Hundley was the best option.
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
6 years ago
Maybe so.... but I would have tried SOMETHING to try to shake things up.
But I guess that's just the way I think.
UserPostedImage
RainX
6 years ago
I think at this juncture if Green Bay got offered anything higher than a fourth rounder for Hundley, I'd be shocked and would probably recommend they take it. 49ers gave up a second rounder for a rental of Garappolo and they could wind up being a steal for SF even with his extension. Hundley did very little to differentiate himself much from the current crop of upcoming FA QBs where any team would be compelled to give up anything worthwhile when they could very clearly sign comparable talent and cost themselves no draft picks.
blank
Smokey
6 years ago
As much as some would like to change this player or that player, it must be clear that there are much greater needs with the Packers than replacing a backup QB. In fact, starting QB's are even harder to come by. A team, like the Eagles who were blessed with two Winning Starting QBs , is a rarity.

Hundley may not be a Rodgers or Brees or Brady, but few are. He is however capable of running the offense in a emergency. Also as a result real game experience last year, he is now more capable. If an acceptable (better) player could be found, it should not interfere with correcting GB's real needs at DE,CB, and TE.


[cheers]

UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
6 years ago

As much as some would like to change this player or that player, it must be clear that there are much greater needs with the Packers than replacing a backup QB. In fact, starting QB's are even harder to come by. A team, like the Eagles who were blessed with two Winning Starting QBs , is a rarity.

Hundley may not be a Rodgers or Brees or Brady, but few are. He is however capable of running the offense in a emergency. Also as a result real game experience last year, he is now more capable. If an acceptable (better) player could be found, it should not interfere with correcting GB's real needs at DE,CB, and TE.


[cheers]

Originally Posted by: Smokey 



Nobody said nor implied otherwise. It doesn't mean we can't talk about a player on the Packers roster. We are not in the draft room. We don't have to study hundreds of hours of film or interview players.

Absolutely NOT! He was one of the worst QBs (statistically) in the whole league last year. I see nothing in him that tells us just because we turn the page on the calendar from 2017 to 2018 that he is magically going to be a better player. Not only is he not Rodgers, Brees or Brady, he is not Trevor Siemian, Blaine Gabbert or Tom Savage.
UserPostedImage
Smokey
6 years ago
wpr, I can't tell you how much I value your opinions. If I did, I be ejected from this forum.
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
6 years ago
Wow...what a slap in the face THAT was.
Smokey didn't you see what happened once Rodgers was lost for most of the season? Without a decent backup QB ( which we don't have) you waste an entire season.
Yes, we have other needs. But without s GOOD backup QB, we will go no where.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
6 years ago

wpr, I can't tell you how much I value your opinions. If I did, I be ejected from this forum.

Originally Posted by: Smokey 



So in other words if I don't agree with everything you say I am a bad guy? If that's what you think then fine by me. I didn't belittle you nor call you names. There was no personal attack made against you.

You came to a public forum and expressed your opinion. Good for you. My only crime is that I had the temerity to disagree with your opinions. Sorry if you are that self conscious maybe you should stick to the threads where you won't feel threaten. Ones like your one word only thread or the what are you eating for dinner thread.

I gave up trying to help you fix your grammatical errors long ago because you seem to take offense. Apparently other people have noticed them too. I didn't do so trying to pick on you or to be critical of you. I make typos all the time and fix them when I notice it. My mistake was in thinking you wanted to know when you used the wrong word. You have been saying that I have been attacking you ever since. I am not. I am actually talking to you like you are a friend. According to many of your replies, I guess I am not.

I didn't do anything in my last post other than say that the vast majority of the people who come to this website already know there are greater issues than who the backup QB is. I would guess that even a 12 yr old knows that. Even so we should still be allowed to talk about him. If you don't want to do so, no one is forcing you to comment on him. If we make a comment or two that doesn't mean we won't comment on another topic too. People can actually post comments on several threads in the same visit.

I still say that Hundley is not a very good NFL quality QB. You obviously disagree. Explain. Are his overall statistics better than Siemian, Gabbert or Savage? I took the easy way and looked at their overall QB Rating. Do you want to narrow your parameters and look at total yards or TDs or Ints or first downs or something else? I don't know what you are thinking because all you said is he is capable of running the offense. Why do you think this? What proof do you have? You are entitled to your opinion. I am asking for you to tell us why you think so. You also said that given the chance he will do better this season. What makes you think so? It can't be because he went through the whole season and was getting better as he got more games under his belt. In week 17 he didn't look very good. 14/24 for 172 yards 1 td and 2 ints. Is it McCarthy's fault for calling plays where he could only throw the ball 2-5 yards down field? Without explaining your comments any better people are allowed to fill in the blanks on their own.

Instead of complaining about me, show me where I am misinformed. I would like to know.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (6h) : Chiefs again huh? I guess another Super Bowl I'll be finding something else to do.
Mucky Tundra (16h) : Chiefs Eagles...again...sigh
dfosterf (17h) : Happy Birthday Dave!
Mucky Tundra (18h) : happy birthday dhazer
TheKanataThrilla (20h) : Exactly buck...Washington came up with the ball. It is just a shitty coincidence one week later
buckeyepackfan (20h) : I forgot, they corrected the call a week later. Lol btw HAPPY BIRTHDAY dhazer!
buckeyepackfan (20h) : That brings up the question, why wasn't Nixon down by contact? I think that was the point Kanata was making.
buckeyepackfan (20h) : Turnovers rule, win the turnover battle, win the game.
packerfanoutwest (20h) : well, he was
TheKanataThrilla (20h) : Eagles down by contact on the fumble....fuck you NFL
Mucky Tundra (21h) : I think this games over
beast (21h) : Eagles sure get a lot of fumbles on kickoffs
Mucky Tundra (21h) : This game looks too big for Washington
packerfanoutwest (26-Jan) : that being said, The Ravens are the Browns
packerfanoutwest (26-Jan) : Browns, Dolphins have longest AFC Championship droughts
packerfanoutwest (26-Jan) : As of today, Cowboys have longest NFC Championship drought,
beast (26-Jan) : Someone pointed out, with Raiders hiring Carroll, the division games between Carroll and Jim Harbaugh are back on (who can whine more games)
beast (26-Jan) : I'm confused, Pete Carroll and Brian Schottenheimer? When Todd Monken, Joe Brady, Kellen Moore, Kliff Kingsbury and Zac Robinson are availab
Zero2Cool (25-Jan) : Any reason I'm catching a shot here about my intelligence?
Martha Careful (25-Jan) : thank you Mucky for sticking up for me
Martha Careful (25-Jan) : some of those people are smarter than you zero. However Pete Carroll is not
Mucky Tundra (24-Jan) : Rude!
beast (24-Jan) : Martha? 😋
Zero2Cool (24-Jan) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.
dfosterf (24-Jan) : I'm going with a combination of the two.
beast (24-Jan) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

25-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.comℱ. All Rights Reserved.