Rodgers : Stupid [blanking] Call· Page 2

dyeah_gb
Member

7 years ago

#11

Maybe he was being critical of himself. I have called myself a bonehead on occasion.

The first principle is that you must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool - R. Feynman

nerdmann
Premier Member

7 years ago

#12

Statwhores are like that don'tcha know? 🤣

Originally Posted by: wpr

When you're starting your 4th and 5th string tackles, might be time to take a three step drop and get the ball out. If you want a stupid play in that situation, try consistently holding the ball for 8 seconds.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

Porforis
Veteran Member

7 years ago

#13

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

So basically we should have played the game like Andy Dalton and the Bengals. Because that's foolproof and an assured win right?

Snark aside, I do wish that we could make adjustments mid-half.

wpr
Preferred Member

7 years ago

#14

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

Nerd I get what you are saying but look at the last 2 games closer. Aaron is not standing int he pocket waiting and waiting for someone 20 yards down field to come clean. Aaron is running around for his life on almost every single play. He is buying time because no one is open. Those quick little passes went for nearly no additional yards every single time. You can't win a game by passing for 2-3 yards and hoping the defender with miss the tackle.

Barfarn
Senior Member

7 years ago

#15

On the play Dunlap beat Bulaga and grabbed Rodgers from behind around the neck and brought Rodgers down and he threw the ball away to avoid the sack.

Dunlap got off of Rodgers with some attitude and Rodgers was not happy, as Dunlap was getting off Rodgers kinda pushed him away. Steratore chased after Dunlap while pointing and barking at him. Then the down ref came to Steratore and Rodgers was listened to them; as the refs agreed to something Rodgers nodded as if in agreement with their decision not to throw a flag.

[This discussion might have been about intentional grounding]

After 2-3 seconds, a true delayed reaction, Rodgers looks pissed; he then turns to his right and in a normal voice mouths whatever he's mouthing. Steratore would have been about 5 yards to Rodgers' right, lining up for next play. There is no doubt, Rodgers is talking to Steratore.

I think Dunlap did something to Rodgers either during the sack or while on the ground, or said something or just laid on him a bit too long. Whatever it was, Steratore saw it; but ate the flag.

Not sure if Rodgers' delayed reaction was due to suddenly recognizing his neck or head was hurting or he was arguing the call in a way that he thought would not show up Steratore. Refs will take a lot of abuse if they;re not shown up publicly.

I think Rodgers was mad a flag was not thrown on Dunlap.

I save the games, those that didn't might be able to find this play in Bengal/Dunlap highlights.

beast
Select Member

7 years ago

#16

Dunlap got off of Rodgers with some attitude and Rodgers was not happy, as Dunlap was getting off Rodgers kinda pushed him away. Steratore chased after Dunlap while pointing and barking at him. Then the down ref came to Steratore and Rodgers was listened to them; as the refs agreed to something Rodgers nodded as if in agreement with their decision not to throw a flag.

[This discussion might have been about intentional grounding]

After 2-3 seconds, a true delayed reaction, Rodgers looks pissed; he then turns to his right and in a normal voice mouths whatever he's mouthing. Steratore would have been about 5 yards to Rodgers' right, lining up for next play. There is no doubt, Rodgers is talking to Steratore.

I think Dunlap did something to Rodgers either during the sack or while on the ground, or said something or just laid on him a bit too long. Whatever it was, Steratore saw it; but ate the flag.

Originally Posted by: Barfarn

Thanks for the breakdown, and if that's the play I think it is, I was wanting the OL over them to shove the defender and missing Lang on that play, as it was appearing the defender was doing something extra to Rodgers and holding him down on the ground even after the play was over..

It looked almost like a professional wrestlin submission hold, as in maybe it wasn't really hurting but he was holding, flexing and they were wiggling on the ground.

Barfarn
Senior Member

7 years ago

#17

Originally Posted by: wpr

Here's the game tying drive:
Play 1: 1st and 10 -Bennett is open on a curl for 8 yards and Monty in flat for 3-4. Rodgers passes this up scrambles for his life and hits Allison on a comebacker for 17.
Play 2: 1st and 10 –Shuffle pass to Monty for 1 yard, but Monty should have gotten 3-4 at least [Something was wrong with him].
Play 3: 2d and 9- Blitz up middle quick pass to Allison for 9 or more; but dropped. [Adams, Bennett and Nelson all open for 4-5 yards at least].
Play 4: 3rd and 9- Slight roll out to get angle on out, quick pass to Allison on 11 yard out.
Play 5: 1st and 10-Quick pass to Allison for 3.
Play 6: 2nd and 7-Allison is open for at least 3; Bennett open for at least 2; Rodgers passes them up. McCray and Murphy with a chip keep pocket clean. Hits Jordy on comebacker for 10.
Play 7: 1st and 10-Quick pass to Monty for 5 yards. Bennett was open for at least 5 as well
Play 8: 2nd and 5-Quick pass to Bennett for 6
Play 9: 1st and 10-Quick pass to Adams for 9
Play 10: 2nd 1: Adams is wide open for 3 on quick pass; pocket is not bad McCray doing great; Murphy giving up ground on a bull rush, to at about 2.2 seconds, so Rodgers tries to hit Monty in endzone, INC
Play 11: 3rd and 1: Run to Monty for 1st
Play 12: 1st and G at 7: Linsley snaps early when Lawson jumps; Rodgers with free play scrambles and goes for broke.
Play 13: 1st and G at 3: Slight roll out to get angle on out, quick out to Jordy for TD.

Receivers were open on EVERY play; Rodgers went sandlot on Play 1 and maybe a bit on plays 6 and 10. Rodgers didn’t need to do it at all. If he's patient and executes the offense even with McCray and Tabor Pepper at Tackle, we can cut Vogel.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

beast (3h) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game

packerfanoutwest (8h) : both games Watson missed, Packers won

Martha Careful (10h) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!

Mucky Tundra (20h) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (20h) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (20h) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (20h) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (20h) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS