Zero2Cool
8 years ago
J.C. Tretter lost his starting Center job to Corey Linsley due to injury. Tretter and the run game have been pretty good and soon Linsley will be healthy.

Who starts at Center? Does Tretter have anything to do with the improved running game or is it coincidental only?
UserPostedImage
PackFanWithTwins
8 years ago
Now that is a tough one. If I didn't have to worry about anything but C, I would probably go with Tretter. He is a little bigger bodied and has the ability to carry more weight which I like. But over all team, Linsley is more limited to C, where Tretter can backup multiple positions. I like to avoid having to shift two players because of one injury.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
nerdmann
8 years ago
They always say you don't lose your job because of injury. I guess Linsley comes back, unless Tretter is doing something Linsley can't.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
sschind
8 years ago

Now that is a tough one. If I didn't have to worry about anything but C, I would probably go with Tretter. He is a little bigger bodied and has the ability to carry more weight which I like. But over all team, Linsley is more limited to C, where Tretter can backup multiple positions. I like to avoid having to shift two players because of one injury.

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins 



Normally I would agree with the shifting two guys but if Tretter is the better guy at center you have to start him in this case. Starting a lesser quality (I'm not saying this is the case) center just because you want a more versatile backup in case of injury elsewhere along the line is not a smart move. Look at it this way. If you start Linsley and Lang gets hurt Tretter goes in for Lang. If you start Tretter and Lang gets hurt Tretter moves over and Linsley comes in. Same result Tretter at G Linsley at Center. Both starting quality players. Personally I don't see that much of a difference between the two. I'd start whichever one offered a better chance to stop Mack.
luigis
8 years ago
I'm convinced Tretter is better. Linsley suffers the Casey Hayward syndrome, in his first season he looked much better than what he really is.

JC played a terrific game against Dallas, he is not stronger but he is a lot faster than Corey and that means he can pull right or left really quickly which opens a lot of options in the running game.

Luis
PackFanWithTwins
8 years ago

They always say you don't lose your job because of injury. I guess Linsley comes back, unless Tretter is doing something Linsley can't.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



Didn't Tretter lose his position due to injury?

Normally I would agree with the shifting two guys but if Tretter is the better guy at center you have to start him in this case. Starting a lesser quality (I'm not saying this is the case) center just because you want a more versatile backup in case of injury elsewhere along the line is not a smart move. Look at it this way. If you start Linsley and Lang gets hurt Tretter goes in for Lang. If you start Tretter and Lang gets hurt Tretter moves over and Linsley comes in. Same result Tretter at G Linsley at Center. Both starting quality players. Personally I don't see that much of a difference between the two. I'd start whichever one offered a better chance to stop Mack.

Originally Posted by: sschind 



The main difference is continuity. If you shift two players, you have two players who didn't practice and take the starters reps on the field instead of one.

But that is only if one is not clearly better than the other.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
DarkaneRules
8 years ago
They are both good players. It depends how healthy Linsley is. If he is not close enough to 90% then I see keep JC in there for continuity. And I 90% because I realize now more than ever that no one is 100% in this league.
Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance
8 years ago
Positives for both players,



J.C. can really get to the second level and open up blocks downfield and can turn on a dime, but he can really get out muscled by the bull rush of some of those bigger interior guys.

Linsley has better form and more power and can hold his own in the trenches, he's also got a bit of that mean streak in him that I haven't seen from Tretter yet, but he doesn't have that athletic ability to get to the second level.

At this point I think I'd stick with Tretter and let Linsley's ankle heal up completely, then we can reassess when both are healthy.
sschind
8 years ago

Didn't Tretter lose his position due to injury?



The main difference is continuity. If you shift two players, you have two players who didn't practice and take the starters reps on the field instead of one.

But that is only if one is not clearly better than the other.

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins 



I get it and like I said normally I would agree, I still do agree to some extent, I just think that the difference at center between the two is minimal and I don't think the lack of continuity would be that great being as Linsley has been the starter for 1 1/2 seasons now and only out for what 3 games. If they start Tretter at C and he is forced to move somewhere else I agree that move could be a bit disruptive but no more than if he comes of the bench. I don't think Linsley coming in at center would be a big deal at all.

Like I said you go with the one who you think gives you the better player at the position.
Mucky Tundra
8 years ago
Does it matter? Whoever starts will get hurt and replaced by the other with the way injuries on the line have been this season.
“Nah. I like having the island. It’s pretty cool...not too many visitors”
UserPostedImage
"I’ve got it." -Aaron Rodgers
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (56m) : 49ers might be down their QB, DL, TE and LT?
packerfanoutwest (14h) : Jaire Alexander says he has a torn PCL
Zero2Cool (20-Nov) : Even with the context it's ... what?
Mucky Tundra (20-Nov) : Matt LaFleur without context: “I don’t wanna pat you on the butt and you poop in my hand.”
beast (20-Nov) : We brought in a former Packers OL coach to help evaluate OL as a scout
beast (20-Nov) : Jets have been pretty good at picking DL
Zero2Cool (20-Nov) : He landed good players thanks to high draft slot. He isn't good.
Zero2Cool (20-Nov) : He can shove his knowledge up his ass. He knows nothing.
beast (20-Nov) : More knowledge, just like bring in the Jets head coach
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : What? Why? Huh?
beast (19-Nov) : I wonder if the Packers might to try to bring Douglas in through Milt Hendrickson/Ravens connections
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : The Jets fired Joe Douglas, per sources
packerfanoutwest (19-Nov) : Jets are a mess......
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : Pretty sure Jets fired their scouting staff and just pluck former Packers.
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : Jets sign Anders Carlson to their 53.
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : When you cycle the weeks, the total over remains for season. But you get your W/L for that selected week. Confusing.
packerfanoutwest (19-Nov) : the total and percentage are the same as the previous weeks
packerfanoutwest (19-Nov) : the total and percentage are the same as the previous weeks
packerfanoutwest (19-Nov) : the totals are accurate..nrvrtmind
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : I don't follow what you are saying. The totals are not the same as last week.
packerfanoutwest (19-Nov) : ok so then wht are the totals the same as last week?
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : NFL Pick'em is auto updated when NFL Scores tab is clicked
Martha Careful (19-Nov) : The offense was OK. Let's not forget the Bear defense is very very good.
packerfanoutwest (19-Nov) : Who updates the leaderboard on NFLPickem?
beast (19-Nov) : Has the Packers offense been worse since the former Jets coach joined the Packers?
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : Offense gets his ass in gear, this could be good.
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : Backup QB helped with three wins. Special Teams contributed to three wins.
bboystyle (18-Nov) : Lions played outside thats why. They scored 16 and 17 in the only 2 outside games this year
Zero2Cool (18-Nov) : The rest of the NFL is catching up to Packers ... kicking is an issue throughout league
packerfanoutwest (18-Nov) : Packers DL Kenny Clark: We knew 'we were going to block' Bears' game-winning field goal attempt
Zero2Cool (18-Nov) : Lions seem to be throttling everyone, but only (only) got 24 lol maybe the rain is why
Zero2Cool (18-Nov) : Packers vs Lions game doesn't seem so bad.
beast (18-Nov) : Dennis Green "They are what we thought they were, and we let them off the hook!"
Martha Careful (17-Nov) : comment of the day Z2Cool "Bears better than we want to admit. Packers worse than we think. It's facts."
Mucky Tundra (17-Nov) : my worst case scenario: Bears fix their oline and get a coach like Johnson from the Lions and his scheme
Zero2Cool (17-Nov) : Bears get OL fixed amd we might have a problem
buckeyepackfan (17-Nov) : Pretty sure they already have scouting reports on guys who aren't even starting for their college team. The future is now for me.
buckeyepackfan (17-Nov) : I tend to let Gute and Co. Worry about the future.
beast (17-Nov) : That's great news and Packers need to keep upgrading their OL, DL and DBs this off-season, so missing one guy doesn't kill them
beast (17-Nov) : That's great news and Packers need to keep upgrading their OL, DL and DBs this off-season, so missing one guy doesn't kill them
buckeyepackfan (17-Nov) : Jaire and Evans Williams are both ACTIVE! Good news.
Martha Careful (17-Nov) : The badgers really need to change the whole offensive scheme. No draws no screens plus the quarterback is marginal
Cheesey (17-Nov) : If the Badgers had a decent QB, they would have won. The guy can't hit a wide open receiver
Martha Careful (17-Nov) : chop block
Martha Careful (17-Nov) : there was a very questionable job Block call that upon viewing replay was very borderline
beast (17-Nov) : How so? (I didn't watch)
Zero2Cool (17-Nov) : Badgers got hosed vs Oregon
packerfanoutwest (16-Nov) : damn,he hasn't played since week 2
Mucky Tundra (15-Nov) : poor guy can't catch a break
wpr (15-Nov) : wow. That three different things for the kid.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

19h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

21-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

21-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

19-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

19-Nov / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

19-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

19-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.