Zero2Cool
9 years ago
J.C. Tretter lost his starting Center job to Corey Linsley due to injury. Tretter and the run game have been pretty good and soon Linsley will be healthy.

Who starts at Center? Does Tretter have anything to do with the improved running game or is it coincidental only?
UserPostedImage
PackFanWithTwins
9 years ago
Now that is a tough one. If I didn't have to worry about anything but C, I would probably go with Tretter. He is a little bigger bodied and has the ability to carry more weight which I like. But over all team, Linsley is more limited to C, where Tretter can backup multiple positions. I like to avoid having to shift two players because of one injury.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
nerdmann
9 years ago
They always say you don't lose your job because of injury. I guess Linsley comes back, unless Tretter is doing something Linsley can't.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
sschind
9 years ago

Now that is a tough one. If I didn't have to worry about anything but C, I would probably go with Tretter. He is a little bigger bodied and has the ability to carry more weight which I like. But over all team, Linsley is more limited to C, where Tretter can backup multiple positions. I like to avoid having to shift two players because of one injury.

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins 



Normally I would agree with the shifting two guys but if Tretter is the better guy at center you have to start him in this case. Starting a lesser quality (I'm not saying this is the case) center just because you want a more versatile backup in case of injury elsewhere along the line is not a smart move. Look at it this way. If you start Linsley and Lang gets hurt Tretter goes in for Lang. If you start Tretter and Lang gets hurt Tretter moves over and Linsley comes in. Same result Tretter at G Linsley at Center. Both starting quality players. Personally I don't see that much of a difference between the two. I'd start whichever one offered a better chance to stop Mack.
luigis
9 years ago
I'm convinced Tretter is better. Linsley suffers the Casey Hayward syndrome, in his first season he looked much better than what he really is.

JC played a terrific game against Dallas, he is not stronger but he is a lot faster than Corey and that means he can pull right or left really quickly which opens a lot of options in the running game.

Luis
PackFanWithTwins
9 years ago

They always say you don't lose your job because of injury. I guess Linsley comes back, unless Tretter is doing something Linsley can't.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



Didn't Tretter lose his position due to injury?

Normally I would agree with the shifting two guys but if Tretter is the better guy at center you have to start him in this case. Starting a lesser quality (I'm not saying this is the case) center just because you want a more versatile backup in case of injury elsewhere along the line is not a smart move. Look at it this way. If you start Linsley and Lang gets hurt Tretter goes in for Lang. If you start Tretter and Lang gets hurt Tretter moves over and Linsley comes in. Same result Tretter at G Linsley at Center. Both starting quality players. Personally I don't see that much of a difference between the two. I'd start whichever one offered a better chance to stop Mack.

Originally Posted by: sschind 



The main difference is continuity. If you shift two players, you have two players who didn't practice and take the starters reps on the field instead of one.

But that is only if one is not clearly better than the other.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
DarkaneRules
9 years ago
They are both good players. It depends how healthy Linsley is. If he is not close enough to 90% then I see keep JC in there for continuity. And I 90% because I realize now more than ever that no one is 100% in this league.
Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance
9 years ago
Positives for both players,



J.C. can really get to the second level and open up blocks downfield and can turn on a dime, but he can really get out muscled by the bull rush of some of those bigger interior guys.

Linsley has better form and more power and can hold his own in the trenches, he's also got a bit of that mean streak in him that I haven't seen from Tretter yet, but he doesn't have that athletic ability to get to the second level.

At this point I think I'd stick with Tretter and let Linsley's ankle heal up completely, then we can reassess when both are healthy.
sschind
9 years ago

Didn't Tretter lose his position due to injury?



The main difference is continuity. If you shift two players, you have two players who didn't practice and take the starters reps on the field instead of one.

But that is only if one is not clearly better than the other.

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins 



I get it and like I said normally I would agree, I still do agree to some extent, I just think that the difference at center between the two is minimal and I don't think the lack of continuity would be that great being as Linsley has been the starter for 1 1/2 seasons now and only out for what 3 games. If they start Tretter at C and he is forced to move somewhere else I agree that move could be a bit disruptive but no more than if he comes of the bench. I don't think Linsley coming in at center would be a big deal at all.

Like I said you go with the one who you think gives you the better player at the position.
Mucky Tundra
9 years ago
Does it matter? Whoever starts will get hurt and replaced by the other with the way injuries on the line have been this season.
“Nah. I like having the island. It’s pretty cool...not too many visitors”
UserPostedImage
"I’ve got it." -Aaron Rodgers
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (13h) : @AaronNagler · 2m Both Jordan Love and Malik Willis were Limited participants at Packers practice today.
Zero2Cool (15h) : Johnson didn't make it until 2020. Ring 2023. 🤷 Personally, he should have been in years prior to Hall.
Zero2Cool (15h) : HUMP DAY
beast (16h) : Guys that have a good shot at making the NFL Hall of Fame usually get into their teams pretty fast
beast (16h) : Yeah, but is Kampman and the others in the NFL Hall of Fame?
Zero2Cool (16h) : Johnson was Hall of Fame, 2020. Should haev been in Ring a year later, not three years.
Zero2Cool (16h) : I could be wrong there though
Zero2Cool (16h) : Guys like Kampman, Tim Harris, Al Harris, etc all over 15 years. Hall of Fame is 5 year wait
Zero2Cool (16h) : I guess I see players in Packers Hall come way later
beast (16h) : Yeah, usually teams hall of fames are a much lower bar than the NFL
Zero2Cool (16h) : is it uncommon for Hall before Ring?
Zero2Cool (16h) : S Xavier McKinney named first-team All-Pro by NFLPA
beast (18h) : I missed it, sorry, but he got into the NFL Hall of Fame years before that
Zero2Cool (18h) : Jones took his sweet ole time!
Zero2Cool (18h) : Yeah, he's in the ring of honor, just saw video and his name is up there
Zero2Cool (18h) : Didn't they have a thing in 2023 for Jimmy's ring of honor? I swear I saw it
beast (18h) : Though if they're legitimately trying to re-sign MM, then it makes sense.
beast (18h) : Jerry Jones still hasn't put Jimmy Johnson in the Ring of Honor, but he's in the NFL's Hall of Fame, Jones is petty
Mucky Tundra (8-Jan) : Unless the Cowboys are planning an extension, seems kinda petty
beast (8-Jan) : Cowboys denied Bears request
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : From what I'm reading, MM is under contract through the 14th of January; after that he's free game
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : McCarthy let go or not extended??
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Chicago Bears have asked the Dallas Cowboys permission to interview Mike McCarthy for head coaching vacancy
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : The winners page that is
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : I was not hoping for that. It messes up the page lol
beast (6-Jan) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3.
beast (6-Jan) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3.
beast (6-Jan) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : congrats beast on 2024 !
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : congrats porky on winning 2023 pick'em! (oops sorry)
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : Packers have $60M+ of 2025 cap space on paper TODAY.
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Missed FG into a Lions TD; that'll do pig, that'll do
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : That might be it for the Vikings
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Oh so the refs do know what intentional grounding is
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : what the hell was that Goff?! Not much pressure and he just air mails it to Harrison
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : They really need to to get rid of the auto first down for illegal contact
Martha Careful (6-Jan) : watching the Vikings and Lions it's understandable why they swept the Packers. So much better product
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Even when GB got pressure he was throwing darts; vs no pressure on that last pass he just air mails an open guy
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : didn't have guys in his face ... pressure makes difference
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Where was this Darnold vs GB?
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : BALL DON'T LIE
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : how was that not a safety? Goff throws it at an offensive lineman
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Zero, I thought that was a given! ;)
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Zero I looked through earlier and noticed the same thing. Bonkers year. I just wonder if beast put any money on games
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : I'm hoping for BLOODBATH. Pummel one another.
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : 8 people in pick'em would have won any year with their total lol
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : I'm rooting for the Lions to lose.
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : God help me but I'm rooting for the Vikings to...Vikings to...Christ I can't say it
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : 4 td for Rodgers
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : Chiefs got shutout
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

8-Jan / Around The NFL / beast

7-Jan / Fantasy Sports Talk / wpr

7-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

7-Jan / Fantasy Sports Talk / Zero2Cool

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

6-Jan / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

5-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

3-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.