wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
10 years ago

I get that you all think it is acceptable because your heroes on FOX use and misuse the new racial slur, but you really will get an ass whooping if you were to call one of brothers the T word. I know you're all keyboard tough guys and all, so go try it out for real and see what happens to you.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 




There is a huge difference between the two words.

The "n word" is race based-

noun
1.Slang: Extremely Disparaging and Offensive.
a contemptuous term used to refer to a black person.
a contemptuous term used to refer to a member of any dark-skinned people.

2. Slang: Extremely Disparaging and Offensive. a contemptuous term used to refer to a person of any racial or ethnic origin regarded as contemptible, inferior, ignorant, etc.

3. a victim of prejudice similar to that suffered by black people; a person who is economically, politically, or socially disenfranchised.



As noted in my earlier post Thug is not. There is nothing racial about about it unless as I said referring to the tribal group from the Asia subcontinent.

As far as walking up and calling someone a thug. That is moronic even for you. I am sure I would get the same response if I called him a SOB. That isn't racial either.

More than 95% of the people of any color or group are decent people. Those who want to act like thugs are not going to be wandering up and down most streets waiting for me to insult.

And just because you or a few other people want to change the meaning of a word doesn't make it so. It takes many years before the accredited dictionaries add new words or new definitions. So you are 10 years too soon for for your little snit. If then.
UserPostedImage
DakotaT
  • DakotaT
  • Select Member Topic Starter
10 years ago

There is a huge difference between the two words.

The "n word" is race based-



As noted in my earlier post Thug is not. There is nothing racial about about it unless as I said referring to the tribal group from the Asia subcontinent.

As far as walking up and calling someone a thug. That is moronic even for you. I am sure I would get the same response if I called him a SOB. That isn't racial either.

More than 95% of the people of any color or group are decent people. Those who want to act like thugs are not going to be wandering up and down most streets waiting for me to insult.

And just because you or a few other people want to change the meaning of a word doesn't make it so. It takes many years before the accredited dictionaries add new words or new definitions. So you are 10 years too soon for for your little snit. If then.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



They can't use the N word anymore so they use Thug instead. I really don't understand why you all feel the need to dig your heels in and argue about this. But I don't know why you all insist on beating up the poor or gays either. Actually, I do know why, just waiting on all of you to figure it out.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
10 years ago

They can't use the N word anymore so they use Thug instead. I really don't understand why you all feel the need to dig your heels in and argue about this. But I don't know why you all insist on beating up the poor or gays either. Actually, I do know why, just waiting on all of you to figure it out.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



I have never heard anyone use the Thug word instead of the N word. Ever.

By your own post it must not be the same because you used the word "Thug" you would never use the n word.

I am not beating up any poor or gay. Show me once where I did that. You can't. Once again by implying I have you are lying. You seem to lie a lot and think the means justifies the end. It doesn't.

I have criticized thieves not the poor. As I said in my last post and many times before that more people are decent. It is the very very few of any group that are the problem.

I won't even begin to discuss gays with you. You ever listen to what I say anyway other than to say I have no issues with any person.
UserPostedImage
DakotaT
  • DakotaT
  • Select Member Topic Starter
10 years ago

I have never heard anyone use the Thug word instead of the N word. Ever.

By your own post it must not be the same because you used the word "Thug" you would never use the n word.

I am not beating up any poor or gay. Show me once where I did that. You can't. Once again by implying I have you are lying. You seem to lie a lot and think the means justifies the end. It doesn't.

I have criticized thieves not the poor. As I said in my last post and many times before that more people are decent. It is the very very few of any group that are the problem.

I won't even begin to discuss gays with you. You ever listen to what I say anyway other than to say I have no issues with any person.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



That's because you only have the ability to reason to the end of your nose, anything past that, and you have real trouble. Just trust me on this one, thug is now a derogatory connotation for those ghetto people that do whatever they have to get by.

Why do you think poor people steal? Can you with a straight face say that they have been presented the same opportunities that you have?
UserPostedImage
texaspackerbacker
10 years ago

They can't use the N word anymore so they use Thug instead. I really don't understand why you all feel the need to dig your heels in and argue about this. But I don't know why you all insist on beating up the poor or gays either. Actually, I do know why, just waiting on all of you to figure it out.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



As I said previously, when you're right, you're ...... well, let's just say not as wrong as usual hahahaha. And this is about as close as you ever come to being right.

While I agree with wpr, I also have never really heard the T word directly substituted for the N word, the fact is, that is a semi-politically correct (that oh so important factor) way us good people to get the point across without quite a s big a shitstorm from your side - I would call that a minor good thing hahahaha.

The MAJOR point, though, is that your side, according to your own words, and YOU in particular, are displaying horrible RACISM. You basically are saying the new liberal DEFINITION of "thug" is "a black person" - what used to be tagged with the N word. Shame on you for that! It's not that big a surprise, though, because virtually everything the libs say and do regarding black people REEKS of racism - stealing their votes, portraying them as not competent to survive without your liberal welfare and favoritism programs, etc.

No wonder your side is so far down the electoral toilet.


Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
10 years ago

That's because you only have the ability to reason to the end of your nose, anything past that, and you have real trouble. Just trust me on this one, thug is now a derogatory connotation for those ghetto people that do whatever they have to get by.

Why do you think poor people steal? Can you with a straight face say that they have been presented the same opportunities that you have?

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



There you go again. How many times would you have used the N word? None. Yet you use 'thug once again. Even you don't believe what you are saying.

Your last question is once again stupid. The real questions are:

How many people who are in a similar situation feel it is necessary to resort to stealing? Very very few.
What makes those who steal better than the others that face the same predicament and forgo stealing? They are not.
Why do people from around the world, who are in much more dire circumstances, not resort to stealing.
Why do the people from other nations wish they could have the standard of living that those who steal have?
How many of those who steal have actually gone out and tried to get jobs?
Does their stealing really support them? Doubtful.

And yet none of this has nothing to do with a handful of people who try and make up a new meaning for a word. In 10 years your definition will have evaporated as a fad.
UserPostedImage
dyeah_gb
10 years ago
Dakota can't tell if you are trolling or not but, if you are not, you sound crazy. You have to come to terms that your reasoning is based on "right-wing" boogeymen that do not exist.

Thug, by itself, is not a racist word. Many a white mafia member deserves the term thug to define their behavior. I guess that is racists to Italians or the Russians or the Chinese.

Accusations of racism serve multiple purposes nowadays. It is a terrible accusation that is very difficult to defend and it allows some to feel intellectually and morally superior to others that they disagree with. In the case of scammers like Sharpton and Jackson, it is a business based on victim-hood. Unfortunately, real racism does exist in this country and is clouded by or lost completely by the politics.
The first principle is that you must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool - R. Feynman
IronMan
10 years ago

Dakota can't tell if you are trolling or not but, if you are not, you sound crazy.

Originally Posted by: dyeah_gb 

If I could applaud this 100 times, I would. I think the same thing when I read his posts. I mean, theres no way he's being serious, right?



DakotaT
  • DakotaT
  • Select Member Topic Starter
10 years ago
You all suffer from a condition called white male's burden. Any time a minority is tired of taking shit and stands up for themselves, you guys are appalled. Every one of you is a cakeating pussy. What bothers me is that you can't admit it. I find great amusement in conversations, so yes, I guess I am a troll because getting all of you to protect your bigotry and easy lives is fun for me.

WPR, last year when Richard Sherman went off with extreme passion, White conservative America was not using thug to call Sherman a thief, they were calling him the N word. All of you can take any bull shit tangent argument and shove it up your candy asses.
UserPostedImage
yooperfan
10 years ago
Actually Troy has a point here.
I worked in a maximum security prison for 25 years so I have a little experience with this issue.

The prison population over those years hovered right around 70% black.
It was very common for black prisoners to call each other "nigger" or "thug" even back then and that was accepted by everyone in there.
However if one of us "crackers" or "pink ass bitches" uttered either word the grievances would be flying, possibly being investigated as using racial slurs.
So there is a racial history with the word "thug", just that most people who have not spent much time around a black community wouldn't relate it as such.
Fan Shout
wpr (12h) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately
Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.
dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.
Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Guessing they probably knew. Did he have cast or something on?
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : Did they know that at the time or was that something the realized afterwards?
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Van Ness played most of season with broken thumb
wpr (9-Apr) : yay
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy says Steelers likely to protect Packers game. Meaning, no Ireland
Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Struggling to figure out what text editor options are needed and which are 'nice to have'
Mucky Tundra (8-Apr) : *CHOMP CHOMP CHOMP*
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : WR who said he'd break Xavier Worthy 40 time...and ran slower than you
Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Who?
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Texas’ WR Isaiah Bond is scheduled to visit the Bills, Browns, Chiefs, Falcons, Packers and Titans starting next week.
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Spotting ball isn't changing, only measuring distance is, Which wasn't the issue.
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : The spotting of the ball IS the issue. Not the chain gang.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
5h / Random Babble / wpr

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

15-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

29-Mar / Random Babble / wpr

28-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

26-Mar / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.