wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
10 years ago

I get that you all think it is acceptable because your heroes on FOX use and misuse the new racial slur, but you really will get an ass whooping if you were to call one of brothers the T word. I know you're all keyboard tough guys and all, so go try it out for real and see what happens to you.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 




There is a huge difference between the two words.

The "n word" is race based-

noun
1.Slang: Extremely Disparaging and Offensive.
a contemptuous term used to refer to a black person.
a contemptuous term used to refer to a member of any dark-skinned people.

2. Slang: Extremely Disparaging and Offensive. a contemptuous term used to refer to a person of any racial or ethnic origin regarded as contemptible, inferior, ignorant, etc.

3. a victim of prejudice similar to that suffered by black people; a person who is economically, politically, or socially disenfranchised.



As noted in my earlier post Thug is not. There is nothing racial about about it unless as I said referring to the tribal group from the Asia subcontinent.

As far as walking up and calling someone a thug. That is moronic even for you. I am sure I would get the same response if I called him a SOB. That isn't racial either.

More than 95% of the people of any color or group are decent people. Those who want to act like thugs are not going to be wandering up and down most streets waiting for me to insult.

And just because you or a few other people want to change the meaning of a word doesn't make it so. It takes many years before the accredited dictionaries add new words or new definitions. So you are 10 years too soon for for your little snit. If then.
UserPostedImage
DakotaT
  • DakotaT
  • Select Member Topic Starter
10 years ago

There is a huge difference between the two words.

The "n word" is race based-



As noted in my earlier post Thug is not. There is nothing racial about about it unless as I said referring to the tribal group from the Asia subcontinent.

As far as walking up and calling someone a thug. That is moronic even for you. I am sure I would get the same response if I called him a SOB. That isn't racial either.

More than 95% of the people of any color or group are decent people. Those who want to act like thugs are not going to be wandering up and down most streets waiting for me to insult.

And just because you or a few other people want to change the meaning of a word doesn't make it so. It takes many years before the accredited dictionaries add new words or new definitions. So you are 10 years too soon for for your little snit. If then.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



They can't use the N word anymore so they use Thug instead. I really don't understand why you all feel the need to dig your heels in and argue about this. But I don't know why you all insist on beating up the poor or gays either. Actually, I do know why, just waiting on all of you to figure it out.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
10 years ago

They can't use the N word anymore so they use Thug instead. I really don't understand why you all feel the need to dig your heels in and argue about this. But I don't know why you all insist on beating up the poor or gays either. Actually, I do know why, just waiting on all of you to figure it out.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



I have never heard anyone use the Thug word instead of the N word. Ever.

By your own post it must not be the same because you used the word "Thug" you would never use the n word.

I am not beating up any poor or gay. Show me once where I did that. You can't. Once again by implying I have you are lying. You seem to lie a lot and think the means justifies the end. It doesn't.

I have criticized thieves not the poor. As I said in my last post and many times before that more people are decent. It is the very very few of any group that are the problem.

I won't even begin to discuss gays with you. You ever listen to what I say anyway other than to say I have no issues with any person.
UserPostedImage
DakotaT
  • DakotaT
  • Select Member Topic Starter
10 years ago

I have never heard anyone use the Thug word instead of the N word. Ever.

By your own post it must not be the same because you used the word "Thug" you would never use the n word.

I am not beating up any poor or gay. Show me once where I did that. You can't. Once again by implying I have you are lying. You seem to lie a lot and think the means justifies the end. It doesn't.

I have criticized thieves not the poor. As I said in my last post and many times before that more people are decent. It is the very very few of any group that are the problem.

I won't even begin to discuss gays with you. You ever listen to what I say anyway other than to say I have no issues with any person.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



That's because you only have the ability to reason to the end of your nose, anything past that, and you have real trouble. Just trust me on this one, thug is now a derogatory connotation for those ghetto people that do whatever they have to get by.

Why do you think poor people steal? Can you with a straight face say that they have been presented the same opportunities that you have?
UserPostedImage
texaspackerbacker
10 years ago

They can't use the N word anymore so they use Thug instead. I really don't understand why you all feel the need to dig your heels in and argue about this. But I don't know why you all insist on beating up the poor or gays either. Actually, I do know why, just waiting on all of you to figure it out.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



As I said previously, when you're right, you're ...... well, let's just say not as wrong as usual hahahaha. And this is about as close as you ever come to being right.

While I agree with wpr, I also have never really heard the T word directly substituted for the N word, the fact is, that is a semi-politically correct (that oh so important factor) way us good people to get the point across without quite a s big a shitstorm from your side - I would call that a minor good thing hahahaha.

The MAJOR point, though, is that your side, according to your own words, and YOU in particular, are displaying horrible RACISM. You basically are saying the new liberal DEFINITION of "thug" is "a black person" - what used to be tagged with the N word. Shame on you for that! It's not that big a surprise, though, because virtually everything the libs say and do regarding black people REEKS of racism - stealing their votes, portraying them as not competent to survive without your liberal welfare and favoritism programs, etc.

No wonder your side is so far down the electoral toilet.


Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
10 years ago

That's because you only have the ability to reason to the end of your nose, anything past that, and you have real trouble. Just trust me on this one, thug is now a derogatory connotation for those ghetto people that do whatever they have to get by.

Why do you think poor people steal? Can you with a straight face say that they have been presented the same opportunities that you have?

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



There you go again. How many times would you have used the N word? None. Yet you use 'thug once again. Even you don't believe what you are saying.

Your last question is once again stupid. The real questions are:

How many people who are in a similar situation feel it is necessary to resort to stealing? Very very few.
What makes those who steal better than the others that face the same predicament and forgo stealing? They are not.
Why do people from around the world, who are in much more dire circumstances, not resort to stealing.
Why do the people from other nations wish they could have the standard of living that those who steal have?
How many of those who steal have actually gone out and tried to get jobs?
Does their stealing really support them? Doubtful.

And yet none of this has nothing to do with a handful of people who try and make up a new meaning for a word. In 10 years your definition will have evaporated as a fad.
UserPostedImage
dyeah_gb
10 years ago
Dakota can't tell if you are trolling or not but, if you are not, you sound crazy. You have to come to terms that your reasoning is based on "right-wing" boogeymen that do not exist.

Thug, by itself, is not a racist word. Many a white mafia member deserves the term thug to define their behavior. I guess that is racists to Italians or the Russians or the Chinese.

Accusations of racism serve multiple purposes nowadays. It is a terrible accusation that is very difficult to defend and it allows some to feel intellectually and morally superior to others that they disagree with. In the case of scammers like Sharpton and Jackson, it is a business based on victim-hood. Unfortunately, real racism does exist in this country and is clouded by or lost completely by the politics.
The first principle is that you must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool - R. Feynman
IronMan
10 years ago

Dakota can't tell if you are trolling or not but, if you are not, you sound crazy.

Originally Posted by: dyeah_gb 

If I could applaud this 100 times, I would. I think the same thing when I read his posts. I mean, theres no way he's being serious, right?



DakotaT
  • DakotaT
  • Select Member Topic Starter
10 years ago
You all suffer from a condition called white male's burden. Any time a minority is tired of taking shit and stands up for themselves, you guys are appalled. Every one of you is a cakeating pussy. What bothers me is that you can't admit it. I find great amusement in conversations, so yes, I guess I am a troll because getting all of you to protect your bigotry and easy lives is fun for me.

WPR, last year when Richard Sherman went off with extreme passion, White conservative America was not using thug to call Sherman a thief, they were calling him the N word. All of you can take any bull shit tangent argument and shove it up your candy asses.
UserPostedImage
yooperfan
10 years ago
Actually Troy has a point here.
I worked in a maximum security prison for 25 years so I have a little experience with this issue.

The prison population over those years hovered right around 70% black.
It was very common for black prisoners to call each other "nigger" or "thug" even back then and that was accepted by everyone in there.
However if one of us "crackers" or "pink ass bitches" uttered either word the grievances would be flying, possibly being investigated as using racial slurs.
So there is a racial history with the word "thug", just that most people who have not spent much time around a black community wouldn't relate it as such.
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (8h) : From what I'm reading, MM is under contract through the 14th of January; after that he's free game
Zero2Cool (8h) : McCarthy let go or not extended??
Mucky Tundra (9h) : Chicago Bears have asked the Dallas Cowboys permission to interview Mike McCarthy for head coaching vacancy
Zero2Cool (14h) : The winners page that is
Zero2Cool (14h) : I was not hoping for that. It messes up the page lol
beast (15h) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3.
beast (15h) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3.
beast (15h) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3
Zero2Cool (15h) : congrats beast on 2024 !
Zero2Cool (15h) : congrats porky on winning 2023 pick'em! (oops sorry)
Zero2Cool (16h) : Packers have $60M+ of 2025 cap space on paper TODAY.
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Missed FG into a Lions TD; that'll do pig, that'll do
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : That might be it for the Vikings
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Oh so the refs do know what intentional grounding is
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : what the hell was that Goff?! Not much pressure and he just air mails it to Harrison
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : They really need to to get rid of the auto first down for illegal contact
Martha Careful (6-Jan) : watching the Vikings and Lions it's understandable why they swept the Packers. So much better product
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Even when GB got pressure he was throwing darts; vs no pressure on that last pass he just air mails an open guy
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : didn't have guys in his face ... pressure makes difference
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Where was this Darnold vs GB?
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : BALL DON'T LIE
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : how was that not a safety? Goff throws it at an offensive lineman
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Zero, I thought that was a given! ;)
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Zero I looked through earlier and noticed the same thing. Bonkers year. I just wonder if beast put any money on games
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : I'm hoping for BLOODBATH. Pummel one another.
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : 8 people in pick'em would have won any year with their total lol
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : I'm rooting for the Lions to lose.
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : God help me but I'm rooting for the Vikings to...Vikings to...Christ I can't say it
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : 4 td for Rodgers
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : Chiefs got shutout
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : Rodgers passes for 3rd TD. might be last game of an amazing career
Mucky Tundra (5-Jan) : "The best laid plans of mice and men often go awry."
Zero2Cool (5-Jan) : Owner ... love it
Zero2Cool (5-Jan) : Mayo was the guy they groomed for HC and one of the reasons they let Bill go.
Mucky Tundra (5-Jan) : Pats have the #4 pick, lots of cap space and Maye at QB; should fetch some attention
Mucky Tundra (5-Jan) : Well that didn't take long; Jerod Mayo out as Patriots HC
Zero2Cool (5-Jan) : I would expect it to be higher in favor of Eagles
Mucky Tundra (5-Jan) : Thst line seems...generous
Zero2Cool (5-Jan) : Eagles -3.5 over Packers in Wildcard Round
Mucky Tundra (5-Jan) : Did it though? Pokes beat the Commanders on the road with Cooper Rush previously
Zero2Cool (5-Jan) : That gives them their best chance
Mucky Tundra (5-Jan) : Cowboys starting Trey Lance at QB vs Commanders; GB vs Philly in the Wild Card incoming!
Mucky Tundra (4-Jan) : Stinks for Lloyd. Hoping he comes back strong for next year
Zero2Cool (3-Jan) : Packers placed Marshawn Lloyd on reserve non-football illness list
Zero2Cool (3-Jan) : Luke Getsy been helping Packers defense. He's former OC Bears/Raiders and our old QB coach
beast (2-Jan) : Thanks dfosterf, I'm still kicking myself for last week, as I forgot to change to pick Vikings and Lions... after putting in a holding spot.
Zero2Cool (2-Jan) : First alternate: Elgton Jenkins Other alternates: Jordan Love, Kenny Clark, Keisean Nixon, Tucker Kraft, Josh Myers, Jaire Alexander
Zero2Cool (2-Jan) : Pro Bowl still a thing? Guess Packers have three. Jacobs, Gary, McKinney.
dfosterf (2-Jan) : It's a mine field with all the players sitting, etc
dfosterf (2-Jan) : There was quite a bit of "chalk" matchups this year it seemed, but not this week coming up
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
6h / Fantasy Sports Talk / Zero2Cool

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

15h / Fantasy Sports Talk / Zero2Cool

17h / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

5-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

5-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

3-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

3-Jan / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

2-Jan / GameDay Threads / Zero2Cool

2-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.