Cheesey
9 years ago
So, please explain to me, WHO exactly turned the word THUG into a racial slur? And what other words in the future will also be labeled that way?
If I call a black person a "cracker", will that make me a racist?
Are we supposed to take any word that describes a horrible act and just throw it out, because someone's feelings might be hurt? I mean, I understand WHY the "N" word shouldn't be used, as it has a history that speaks for itself. But THUG???
Should the word "punk" be thrown out next, because some people think it only pertains to black people?

Political correctness is making it impossible to talk at all, for fear of offending some weak person's feelings.

If thug bothers some so much, they need to get a backbone.
Troy constantly labels anyone that disagrees with his opinions as a right wing nut case.
Does he feel it's ok, because most of us "rightys" are white?
Does that make it OK to slander us, because we arn't the color he prefers not to insult?

I try to make points without name calling, but some think they are so righteous that they can throw out civility because THEIR opinion makes them SOOOO much better then those they rail on.
It's ok to stand up for yourself, if the point you are trying to make is actually valid. No matter WHAT color your skin is.

I hope that pedastal some put themselves on doesn't make the fall from it fatal.

Troy, do you know where the word "thug" comes from? It had NOTHINH to do with the color of someone's skin. You can try to make it that way today, but that doesn't make it so.
THUGEES I believe is where it comes from, and it was a group of people that did horrible acts. Not anything to do with color.
UserPostedImage
dyeah_gb
9 years ago

You all suffer from a condition called white male's burden. Any time a minority is tired of taking shit and stands up for themselves, you guys are appalled. Every one of you is a cakeating pussy. What bothers me is that you can't admit it. I find great amusement in conversations, so yes, I guess I am a troll because getting all of you to protect your bigotry and easy lives is fun for me.

WPR, last year when Richard Sherman went off with extreme passion, White conservative America was not using thug to call Sherman a thief, they were calling him the N word. All of you can take any bull shit tangent argument and shove it up your candy asses.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



How is one supposed to respond to your comment? Are you seriously referencing Rudyard Kipling? Your points are clearly driven by some deep-seeded stereotypes and hatred but they are so incoherent that no one can understand where you are coming from.

Back to the topic: The idea of associating thug as a racist term assumes intent on the user with no obvious proof. How is this any less offensive than accusing someone of being a pedophile or a potential rapist? Further, any word can be associated in the same way. Suh's actions were clearly those of a Canadian and anyone who isn't blind can see that.
The first principle is that you must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool - R. Feynman
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
9 years ago

You all suffer from a condition called white male's burden. Any time a minority is tired of taking shit and stands up for themselves, you guys are appalled. Every one of you is a cakeating pussy. What bothers me is that you can't admit it. I find great amusement in conversations, so yes, I guess I am a troll because getting all of you to protect your bigotry and easy lives is fun for me.

WPR, last year when Richard Sherman went off with extreme passion, White conservative America was not using thug to call Sherman a thief, they were calling him the N word. All of you can take any bull shit tangent argument and shove it up your candy asses.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



Sit in your bitterness you petty little man. I have no hatred for any of mankind. I will still oppose wrongdoing be it a White man or a Black one or many other color or creed or whatever.
UserPostedImage
texaspackerbacker
9 years ago

You all suffer from a condition called white male's burden. Any time a minority is tired of taking shit and stands up for themselves, you guys are appalled. Every one of you is a cakeating pussy. What bothers me is that you can't admit it. I find great amusement in conversations, so yes, I guess I am a troll because getting all of you to protect your bigotry and easy lives is fun for me.

WPR, last year when Richard Sherman went off with extreme passion, White conservative America was not using thug to call Sherman a thief, they were calling him the N word. All of you can take any bull shit tangent argument and shove it up your candy asses.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



Not that you would EVER display the competence to answer questions, but your post really begs a few.

First of all, as was mentioned, you invoked Rudyard Kipling. Do you even have a clue as to what was meant by "white man's burden"? It was the "liberalism" of his day, and indeed, it is EXACTLY the variety of racism I have accused YOU and modern liberals of: portraying blacks as not having the ability to survive and thrive without your welfare and programs to slant the playing field in their favor.

Second question: do you even know or have contact with any black people? You mentioned "ghettos", have you been to any in let's say the last 5 or 10 years?

Third, are you familiar with David Clarke - the recently re-elected sheriff of Milwaukee County? If so, what do you think of him. If not, check him out and say what you think of him - not that you ever would hahahaha.

You persist in equating the T word with the N word - which clearly is a blatantly racist point of view. HOW could you possibly see defining thugs as black people as NOT racist?


Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.
DakotaT
  • DakotaT
  • Select Member Topic Starter
9 years ago

Sit in your bitterness you petty little man. I have no hatred for any of mankind. I will still oppose wrongdoing be it a White man or a Black one or many other color or creed or whatever.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



Who the hell are you to call anybody a thief selling insurance? LOL

If I'm so petty, you're completely clueless in the realm of right and wrong.
UserPostedImage
DakotaT
  • DakotaT
  • Select Member Topic Starter
9 years ago

Actually Troy has a point here.
I worked in a maximum security prison for 25 years so I have a little experience with this issue.

The prison population over those years hovered right around 70% black.
It was very common for black prisoners to call each other "nigger" or "thug" even back then and that was accepted by everyone in there.
However if one of us "crackers" or "pink ass bitches" uttered either word the grievances would be flying, possibly being investigated as using racial slurs.
So there is a racial history with the word "thug", just that most people who have not spent much time around a black community wouldn't relate it as such.

Originally Posted by: yooperfan 



Don't worry Yooper, to a man these idiots believe that the blacks are just lucky to be here and that they have been treated well, the Native Americans are so much better off because they have Casinos and buffalo checks, and stealing the American Southwest was just part of the war - ours for the taking. And they will go to whatever length possible to defend the Paradise they were handed. These men are complete fools, but then again, don't you have to be to believe Jesus was a blond haired, blue eyed white boy born a Hebrew and that the Earth is only 6,000 years old.
UserPostedImage
sschind
9 years ago
So if we assume for a minute that what Dakota is saying true then what we have become is a nation that will allow a group of people to change what is deemed offensive at their will. Its as if we have a group of people who are so desperate to be offended so they can justify their behavior as a reaction to racism that when one offensive word used against them is very effectively removed from society (we can't even write or say the word nigger, we have to say "the N-Word) they have to come up with another one. Its not a race thing its a cultural thing and even a sub cultural thing at that. The only people who should be offended by being called thugs are thugs and then they shouldn't be offended because that is what they are. Its no different than calling rapists rapists or child molesters child molesters. We don't call people pedophiles pedophiles because of the color of their skin we call them pedophiles because the have sex with children.

If I am surrounded by a half a dozen scary looking black men, or white men or Hispanic men or Asian men or even a mixed race group of tough looking women who want to kill me and steal my money I'm probably not going to call them thugs to their faces but its not because I am afraid of offending them because of their race its because they are thugs and they will probably kill me and steal my money if I do. That is what thugs do.

I don't think there are many people of any race calling anyone who is an upstanding productive member of society a thug. Why not? Because they are not thugs. Hell, they probably don't even have to be all that upstanding or productive. In that case we may call them something else but it probably won't be a thug. This is because the word thug is not a racist word. Regardless of its origin it is a word that is used to describe a particular type of person, who behaves in a particular way and until now it has had a fairly specific meaning. I do think that it may have become an overused word and as such has lost a little of its meaning. Perhaps that is why this particular group has latched onto it as its new offensive term. It is easier to convince people that it is being used in a racist manner because the true definition has been clouded by over use. If this word becomes the new "nigger" its because the thugs have decided to make it so and we have allowed them to make it so out of fear of being labeled a racist.
DakotaT
  • DakotaT
  • Select Member Topic Starter
9 years ago

So if we assume for a minute that what Dakota is saying true then what we have become is a nation that will allow a group of people to change what is deemed offensive at their will. Its as if we have a group of people who are so desperate to be offended so they can justify their behavior as a reaction to racism that when one offensive word used against them is very effectively removed from society (we can't even write or say the word nigger, we have to say "the N-Word) they have to come up with another one. Its not a race thing its a cultural thing and even a sub cultural thing at that. The only people who should be offended by being called thugs are thugs and then they shouldn't be offended because that is what they are. Its no different than calling rapists rapists or child molesters child molesters. We don't call people pedophiles pedophiles because of the color of their skin we call them pedophiles because the have sex with children.

If I am surrounded by a half a dozen scary looking black men, or white men or Hispanic men or Asian men or even a mixed race group of tough looking women who want to kill me and steal my money I'm probably not going to call them thugs to their faces but its not because I am afraid of offending them because of their race its because they are thugs and they will probably kill me and steal my money if I do. That is what thugs do.

I don't think there are many people of any race calling anyone who is an upstanding productive member of society a thug. Why not? Because they are not thugs. Hell, they probably don't even have to be all that upstanding or productive. In that case we may call them something else but it probably won't be a thug. This is because the word thug is not a racist word. Regardless of its origin it is a word that is used to describe a particular type of person, who behaves in a particular way and until now it has had a fairly specific meaning. I do think that it may have become an overused word and as such has lost a little of its meaning. Perhaps that is why this particular group has latched onto it as its new offensive term. It is easier to convince people that it is being used in a racist manner because the true definition has been clouded by over use. If this word becomes the new "nigger" its because the thugs have decided to make it so and we have allowed them to make it so out of fear of being labeled a racist.

Originally Posted by: sschind 



"Assume" I'm right? You all better start praying your descendants are going to be treated as a minority a hell of a lot better than we treated everybody else. Demographics are changing rapidly and all our sins from the past are coming home to roost. And you can thank your right wing nut cases for stirring up the pot for how they've treated our first black president.
UserPostedImage
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
9 years ago
If someone called me a thug, that would bother me. I don't think I'm a thug.

But if I were a thug, why should it bother me to be called what I am.

And if I think someone else is a thug -- N. Suh, for an example, or Donald Rumsfeld or Tweety Bird -- why should they be bothered? Because they think I'm a racist who thinks all black men or all white Republicans or all bird brains are thugs because of the group they belong to? Or because I'm calling them as an individual something they are not?

Race is, and it always has been, a human invention and a human conceptualization.

ISTM, and has for a long time now, that there's nothing wrong with taking someone's use of a derogatory term personal when it is referring to you as an individual. Thug is a derogatory term. If you (the individual you) think you aren't a thug, and I call you one, feel free to take offense. BUt for heaven's sake don't take offense because I've offended your race or your gender or your age group or any of those other groups you think you belong to.

Because quite frankly, I don't give a flying fuck or a rolling donut what group you define yourself as. I think you are a thug, Mister, because you -- you the fucking asshole individual that you are -- are a thug. I'm not looking at the color of your skin or what's in your pants. I'm labelling you because I've seen you do something thuggish or because I believe what others have told me about your individually thuggish behavior.

And frankly, if you decide that I have offended you by labelling you based on a small sample of your behavior or on hearsay evidence that I the individual have relied on? Then make it personal to me. Not because I'm a member of a group. But because you think I, Wade, the single individual, am an asshole and a jerk.

The problem with this "political redefinition of words" bullshit is not that this group is being racially profiled or that this other group is being labelled racist. The problem is that it substitutes group offense for individual offense. The problem is that we are all hiding behind groups, when what we should be concentrating on whether Suh did something bad or whether Wade said something inaccurate about an individual.

You want to take something that I said to you personal? Fine. Be my guest. You don't want to personally associate with me when I say the wrong thing about you or some other individual. Fine. Do that, too. And I'll do the same with what you say to me and about others. And we'll both be better off.


And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Zero2Cool
9 years ago

So if we assume for a minute that what Dakota is saying true then what we have become is a nation that will allow a group of people to change what is deemed offensive at their will.

Originally Posted by: sschind 



To quote Harvey Dent: "you either die a hero or you live long enough to see yourself become the villain" and that is what our society has become. What is acceptable today someone will find reason for complaint tomorrow.

Rather than worrying about important things like feeding the hungry, curing cancer, clothing the less fortunate, etc ... people get up in arms over words because of their own insecurities of who they are.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (20h) : rude
Mucky Tundra (20h) : RIP Frank Ragnow
Mucky Tundra (20h) : @E_Woodyard #Lions HC Dan Campbell says they're gonna put Frank Ragnow down this week. "We've got to be smart," Campbell said.
bboystyle (25-Sep) : Favre using the pitty card during that hearing for his criminal acts
Zero2Cool (24-Sep) : Former Packers QB Brett Favre recently announced he was diagnosed with Parkinson's.
Zero2Cool (24-Sep) : The only QBs this season with 0 turnover-worthy plays according to PFF (minimum 30 dropbacks) Aaron Rodgers Malik Willis Justin Fields
Mucky Tundra (23-Sep) : @DavidBearmanPFN · 18h Vegas has watched Will Levis for 3 weeks and installed them as a 1-point favorite in Miami next week. Let that sink
Mucky Tundra (23-Sep) : Martha, they did play much better with Dalton yesterday
Zero2Cool (23-Sep) : Test results on Sam Darnold’s knee showed a knee bruise and no structural damage. He is not expected to miss any time.
Martha Careful (23-Sep) : Not with Dalton apparently
Mucky Tundra (23-Sep) : Not sure what to make of the NFC South so far this season (outside of the Panthers being a dumpster fire)
Mucky Tundra (22-Sep) : of course I say that and then they overturn that play that put them on the 49ers 2 yard line
Mucky Tundra (22-Sep) : *without
Mucky Tundra (22-Sep) : Even with Nacua and Kupp out, Rams looking fiesty on offense
Martha Careful (22-Sep) : Tim Boyle is playing for the Dolphins
Martha Careful (22-Sep) : I love seeing Dallas lose
Mucky Tundra (22-Sep) : The Red Rifle is on fire in Las Vegas! 3 TDs in the first half!
Mucky Tundra (22-Sep) : @mattschneidman · 2m The fire alarm is going off inside the Packers locker room here in Nashville.
Mucky Tundra (22-Sep) : Gonna need a drink after looking at my picks for the early games in Pick'em
Zero2Cool (22-Sep) : James Jones. Y’all must not know, Dr. Mackenzie🤣 he was not going to let Jordan love play today.
Zero2Cool (22-Sep) : Malik to start. Love inactive. Per report. Let's go!!
buckeyepackfan (22-Sep) : I think J-10VE will be inactive, a little twist that could be put in is run a wildcat with Wicks at qb. Have him as emergency qb if needed.
Zero2Cool (21-Sep) : I think that's how it works.
Zero2Cool (21-Sep) : I'd go 3 QB regardless this game.
Zero2Cool (21-Sep) : Clifford was elevated, not activated. He doesn't play, it doesn't count.
hardrocker950 (21-Sep) : If Clifford is active, not likely to see Jordan play this weekend
Mucky Tundra (21-Sep) : QB Sean Clifford and CB Robert Rochell elevated from the PS for the Titans game
Zero2Cool (20-Sep) : Love questionable. Morgan is out. Valentine is doubtful
Martha Careful (20-Sep) : Rodgers and Lazard off to a very strong start
Zero2Cool (19-Sep) : Josh Jacobs. Limited.
Zero2Cool (19-Sep) : Can't find anything on Jacobs :(
wpr (19-Sep) : Do you know if they gave Jacobs an extra day off? I hope so.
Zero2Cool (19-Sep) : WR Jayden Reed (calf) and G Elgton Jenkins (illness/glute) returned after sitting out Wednesday.
Zero2Cool (19-Sep) : Packers are in pads and so is Jordan Love. Second straight day of practice for QB1.
bboystyle (18-Sep) : If Love comes back, we win in a blow out
Zero2Cool (18-Sep) : Jordan Love just spoke with reporters and said he’s giving himself the week but hopeful to play Sunday against the Titans.
Zero2Cool (18-Sep) : Practicing is Jordan Love!
Zero2Cool (18-Sep) : Packers are signing WR Cornelius Johnson to the Practice Squad per sources. Johnson was a 7th round pick this year.
Zero2Cool (17-Sep) : Packers placed RB MarShawn Lloyd on injured reserve.
Zero2Cool (16-Sep) : Rams won’t have Cooper Kupp or Puka Nacua when they host the Packers in Week 5.
Mucky Tundra (16-Sep) : Or is that the Rusty Red Rifle because of his age?
Mucky Tundra (16-Sep) : The Red Rifle Returns!
Zero2Cool (16-Sep) : Panthers are benching former No. 1 overall pick Bryce Young and starting veteran Andy Dalton beginning this week.
Mucky Tundra (16-Sep) : bears still have slim chance here
Mucky Tundra (16-Sep) : and there's another one!
Mucky Tundra (16-Sep) : oh crap macbob has the Texans K and he keeps hitting these long FGs
Mucky Tundra (15-Sep) : Hope the Texans beat the brakes off the Bears
Zero2Cool (15-Sep) : LaFleur: “I asked Malik why he didn’t throw it on that third down and he told me Josh threw up on the ball.”
Mucky Tundra (15-Sep) : i was wondering why it was just you, me, beast and macbob by the end
Zero2Cool (15-Sep) : Yeah it was weird today for some reason
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
34m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

1h / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

2h / Random Babble / wpr

26-Sep / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

25-Sep / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

25-Sep / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

25-Sep / GameDay Threads / wpr

24-Sep / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Sep / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

23-Sep / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Sep / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

23-Sep / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

23-Sep / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.