wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
10 years ago

I get that you all think it is acceptable because your heroes on FOX use and misuse the new racial slur, but you really will get an ass whooping if you were to call one of brothers the T word. I know you're all keyboard tough guys and all, so go try it out for real and see what happens to you.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 




There is a huge difference between the two words.

The "n word" is race based-

noun
1.Slang: Extremely Disparaging and Offensive.
a contemptuous term used to refer to a black person.
a contemptuous term used to refer to a member of any dark-skinned people.

2. Slang: Extremely Disparaging and Offensive. a contemptuous term used to refer to a person of any racial or ethnic origin regarded as contemptible, inferior, ignorant, etc.

3. a victim of prejudice similar to that suffered by black people; a person who is economically, politically, or socially disenfranchised.



As noted in my earlier post Thug is not. There is nothing racial about about it unless as I said referring to the tribal group from the Asia subcontinent.

As far as walking up and calling someone a thug. That is moronic even for you. I am sure I would get the same response if I called him a SOB. That isn't racial either.

More than 95% of the people of any color or group are decent people. Those who want to act like thugs are not going to be wandering up and down most streets waiting for me to insult.

And just because you or a few other people want to change the meaning of a word doesn't make it so. It takes many years before the accredited dictionaries add new words or new definitions. So you are 10 years too soon for for your little snit. If then.
UserPostedImage
DakotaT
  • DakotaT
  • Select Member Topic Starter
10 years ago

There is a huge difference between the two words.

The "n word" is race based-



As noted in my earlier post Thug is not. There is nothing racial about about it unless as I said referring to the tribal group from the Asia subcontinent.

As far as walking up and calling someone a thug. That is moronic even for you. I am sure I would get the same response if I called him a SOB. That isn't racial either.

More than 95% of the people of any color or group are decent people. Those who want to act like thugs are not going to be wandering up and down most streets waiting for me to insult.

And just because you or a few other people want to change the meaning of a word doesn't make it so. It takes many years before the accredited dictionaries add new words or new definitions. So you are 10 years too soon for for your little snit. If then.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



They can't use the N word anymore so they use Thug instead. I really don't understand why you all feel the need to dig your heels in and argue about this. But I don't know why you all insist on beating up the poor or gays either. Actually, I do know why, just waiting on all of you to figure it out.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
10 years ago

They can't use the N word anymore so they use Thug instead. I really don't understand why you all feel the need to dig your heels in and argue about this. But I don't know why you all insist on beating up the poor or gays either. Actually, I do know why, just waiting on all of you to figure it out.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



I have never heard anyone use the Thug word instead of the N word. Ever.

By your own post it must not be the same because you used the word "Thug" you would never use the n word.

I am not beating up any poor or gay. Show me once where I did that. You can't. Once again by implying I have you are lying. You seem to lie a lot and think the means justifies the end. It doesn't.

I have criticized thieves not the poor. As I said in my last post and many times before that more people are decent. It is the very very few of any group that are the problem.

I won't even begin to discuss gays with you. You ever listen to what I say anyway other than to say I have no issues with any person.
UserPostedImage
DakotaT
  • DakotaT
  • Select Member Topic Starter
10 years ago

I have never heard anyone use the Thug word instead of the N word. Ever.

By your own post it must not be the same because you used the word "Thug" you would never use the n word.

I am not beating up any poor or gay. Show me once where I did that. You can't. Once again by implying I have you are lying. You seem to lie a lot and think the means justifies the end. It doesn't.

I have criticized thieves not the poor. As I said in my last post and many times before that more people are decent. It is the very very few of any group that are the problem.

I won't even begin to discuss gays with you. You ever listen to what I say anyway other than to say I have no issues with any person.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



That's because you only have the ability to reason to the end of your nose, anything past that, and you have real trouble. Just trust me on this one, thug is now a derogatory connotation for those ghetto people that do whatever they have to get by.

Why do you think poor people steal? Can you with a straight face say that they have been presented the same opportunities that you have?
UserPostedImage
texaspackerbacker
10 years ago

They can't use the N word anymore so they use Thug instead. I really don't understand why you all feel the need to dig your heels in and argue about this. But I don't know why you all insist on beating up the poor or gays either. Actually, I do know why, just waiting on all of you to figure it out.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



As I said previously, when you're right, you're ...... well, let's just say not as wrong as usual hahahaha. And this is about as close as you ever come to being right.

While I agree with wpr, I also have never really heard the T word directly substituted for the N word, the fact is, that is a semi-politically correct (that oh so important factor) way us good people to get the point across without quite a s big a shitstorm from your side - I would call that a minor good thing hahahaha.

The MAJOR point, though, is that your side, according to your own words, and YOU in particular, are displaying horrible RACISM. You basically are saying the new liberal DEFINITION of "thug" is "a black person" - what used to be tagged with the N word. Shame on you for that! It's not that big a surprise, though, because virtually everything the libs say and do regarding black people REEKS of racism - stealing their votes, portraying them as not competent to survive without your liberal welfare and favoritism programs, etc.

No wonder your side is so far down the electoral toilet.


Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
10 years ago

That's because you only have the ability to reason to the end of your nose, anything past that, and you have real trouble. Just trust me on this one, thug is now a derogatory connotation for those ghetto people that do whatever they have to get by.

Why do you think poor people steal? Can you with a straight face say that they have been presented the same opportunities that you have?

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



There you go again. How many times would you have used the N word? None. Yet you use 'thug once again. Even you don't believe what you are saying.

Your last question is once again stupid. The real questions are:

How many people who are in a similar situation feel it is necessary to resort to stealing? Very very few.
What makes those who steal better than the others that face the same predicament and forgo stealing? They are not.
Why do people from around the world, who are in much more dire circumstances, not resort to stealing.
Why do the people from other nations wish they could have the standard of living that those who steal have?
How many of those who steal have actually gone out and tried to get jobs?
Does their stealing really support them? Doubtful.

And yet none of this has nothing to do with a handful of people who try and make up a new meaning for a word. In 10 years your definition will have evaporated as a fad.
UserPostedImage
dyeah_gb
10 years ago
Dakota can't tell if you are trolling or not but, if you are not, you sound crazy. You have to come to terms that your reasoning is based on "right-wing" boogeymen that do not exist.

Thug, by itself, is not a racist word. Many a white mafia member deserves the term thug to define their behavior. I guess that is racists to Italians or the Russians or the Chinese.

Accusations of racism serve multiple purposes nowadays. It is a terrible accusation that is very difficult to defend and it allows some to feel intellectually and morally superior to others that they disagree with. In the case of scammers like Sharpton and Jackson, it is a business based on victim-hood. Unfortunately, real racism does exist in this country and is clouded by or lost completely by the politics.
The first principle is that you must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool - R. Feynman
IronMan
10 years ago

Dakota can't tell if you are trolling or not but, if you are not, you sound crazy.

Originally Posted by: dyeah_gb 

If I could applaud this 100 times, I would. I think the same thing when I read his posts. I mean, theres no way he's being serious, right?



DakotaT
  • DakotaT
  • Select Member Topic Starter
10 years ago
You all suffer from a condition called white male's burden. Any time a minority is tired of taking shit and stands up for themselves, you guys are appalled. Every one of you is a cakeating pussy. What bothers me is that you can't admit it. I find great amusement in conversations, so yes, I guess I am a troll because getting all of you to protect your bigotry and easy lives is fun for me.

WPR, last year when Richard Sherman went off with extreme passion, White conservative America was not using thug to call Sherman a thief, they were calling him the N word. All of you can take any bull shit tangent argument and shove it up your candy asses.
UserPostedImage
yooperfan
10 years ago
Actually Troy has a point here.
I worked in a maximum security prison for 25 years so I have a little experience with this issue.

The prison population over those years hovered right around 70% black.
It was very common for black prisoners to call each other "nigger" or "thug" even back then and that was accepted by everyone in there.
However if one of us "crackers" or "pink ass bitches" uttered either word the grievances would be flying, possibly being investigated as using racial slurs.
So there is a racial history with the word "thug", just that most people who have not spent much time around a black community wouldn't relate it as such.
Fan Shout
beast (28m) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
beast (28m) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
Zero2Cool (10h) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (10h) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (12h) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (13h) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (14h) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
Zero2Cool (14h) : Thank you
wpr (14h) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (14h) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (14h) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
wpr (14h) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
dfosterf (14h) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
Zero2Cool (15h) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
Zero2Cool (15h) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
Martha Careful (15h) : just kidding...it was down
Martha Careful (15h) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
dfosterf (15h) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Oh snap!!!
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Even Stevie Wonder can see that.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Nah, you see Lions OC leaving to be HC of Bears is directly related to Packers.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ohhhhhhh Zero is in TROUBLE
packerfanoutwest (21-Jan) : Zero, per your orders, check Bearshome, not packershome
Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : Then he'll land with another team and flourish.
Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : Ben going to Bears. He'll be out in 3 years.
Mucky Tundra (20-Jan) : what's so funny?
Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

15h / Random Babble / packerfanoutwest

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.