Aaron Rodgers looks pretty good on TV to me, so that means I'm wrong because I'm not watching live? Wow, I guess he sucks because my TV tells me he's good. TV is always in opposition with reality?
Eddie Lacy looks good to me, but he must be easy to tackle because he looks tough to tackle on TV.
Sam Shields looks fast on TV, but must be slow because I can't get a sense from TV.
BTW, what do scouts and GM's use a lot of to make player evaluations? T-A-P-E...what do they watch it on? A television. Our org has been doing it wrong. We shouldn't be watching tape because it's been misleading us not giving us the better players.
So, people who played football in HS, like me, understand NFL football? I played all the sports growing up... so you should bow to me? I don't understand where in the world you're coming from? Who has played the game that got frustrated? Sounds like they wanted to be validated because they played and nothing more.
What is a stupid debate? You arguing to keep fringe roster players over guys who have the talent to be 1st round draft picks?
If none of us can know who is good or who is bad, or what makes good football or bad football you may as well shut down Packer fan sites. J
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."