2012 Packers roster to 75· Page 2

earthquake
Member

12 years ago

source:

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/24/packers-cut-anthony-hargrove/

Packers cut Hargrove, Herb Taylor, WR Andrew Brewer, S Micah Pellerin, and CB Dion Turner.

Good news for everyone wanting to see Taylor gone.

Apparently they can re-sign Hargove after week 8, he can fulfill his suspension even if he's not on a roster. Though I'm not sure he has shown enough to warrant a spot even then.

blank

beast
Select Member

12 years ago

#12

Apparently they can re-sign Hargove after week 8, he can fulfill his suspension even if he's not on a roster. Though I'm not sure he has shown enough to warrant a spot even then.

Originally Posted by: earthquake

If they wanted him after his suspension then they wouldn't of cut him to start with... he can be put on a suspension list and doesn't count against the 53 man roster list until his suspension was up.

earthquake
Member

12 years ago

#13

If they wanted him after his suspension then they wouldn't of cut him to start with... he can be put on a suspension list and doesn't count against the 53 man roster list until his suspension was up.

Originally Posted by: beast

Yeah I suppose you're right.

Also doh, slow on the new thread button.

blank

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

12 years ago

#14

If they wanted him after his suspension then they wouldn't of cut him to start with... he can be put on a suspension list and doesn't count against the 53 man roster list until his suspension was up.

Originally Posted by: beast

They would if they didn't want to PAY him for those games suspended, right?

nerdmann
Premier Member

12 years ago

#15

I think it was simple because Hargrove was looking bad in his very limited snaps... I don't think it had to do with political or money... just like the other guys cut haven't looked too good ether.

Originally Posted by: beast

Well we wouldn't have to pay him, so why not keep him around? Suppose somebody goes down between now and week 8?

Just seems like a statement is being made, imo.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

DakotaT
Select Member

12 years ago

#16

I think we are like a bunch of old women insisting on conspiracy theories where there are none.

beast
Select Member

12 years ago

#17

They would if they didn't want to PAY him for those games suspended, right?

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

I think the suspension are unpaid suspensions... but I don't know that.

But I think some players might want to be suspended if they were paid suspension... less work for the same amount of money. I think the loss of money is the big thing for the players.

Well we wouldn't have to pay him, so why not keep him around? Suppose somebody goes down between now and week 8?

Just seems like a statement is being made, imo.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

I agree he could of made a safety net in case an injury happen between now and then. But I guess he wasn't showing enough for them to keep him even as a safety net.

But there also have been reports that Hargrove has been getting "frustrated" in practice and might of had a "dust-up" with DL coach Mike Trgovac. (some of the article is edited out so some might go read it (if I linked it correctly)

http://www.jsonline.com/blogs/sports/167380305.html

Over the last week, Hargrove was clearly frustrated with his practice time. In one practice, he kicked his helmet after not getting any reps in the one-on-one pass rush drill.

Article wrote:

He appeared to get in a dust-up with defensive line coach Mike Trgovac, (edit some out) Hargrove seemed to ignore Trgovac's call (edit some out) the two had words on the sideline. (edit some out) Hargrove was the only healthy player not to play against the Bengals.

Article wrote:

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

12 years ago

#18

Originally Posted by: beast

The player doesn't get their paycheck, but the team has to pay the player, which that pay goes to the NFL. At least, to my understanding that's how it's been.

Pack93z
Select Member

12 years ago

#19

All about the roster spot..

"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"

wpr
Preferred Member

12 years ago

#20

New Orleans Saints linebacker Jonathan Vilma was suspended without pay for the entire 2012 season by the NFL, one of four players punished on Wednesday for participating in the team's cash-for-hits bounty system.

Defensive lineman Anthony Hargrove, now with the Green Bay Packers, was suspended for the first half of the 16-game season; Saints defensive end Will Smith was barred for the opening four games; and linebacker Scott Fujita, now with the Cleveland Browns, will miss the first three games. Like Vilma, they were suspended without pay.

ESPN

Zero can you show where it says the money was to be paid to the league? I vaguely remember seeing something like that a year or two ago but not about this incident.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

dfosterf (5h) : Mackelvie

dfosterf (5h) : Michael Macelvie- NFL teams know how to draft- Why don"t they?

dfosterf (5h) : Youtube

Zero2Cool (10h) : Packers were not selected for the 2025 Hall of Fame game.

dfosterf (12h) : PFOW Out of our division would be a good thing imo

Zero2Cool (14h) : Jameson Williams is done at 24 years old? What? He's a WR, not QB. I'm missing something here haha

wpr (14h) : Tomorrow is almost here.

packerfanoutwest (14h) : would you want him if Pack needed a back up qb?

packerfanoutwest (14h) : JW is done......stick a fork in him

Zero2Cool (16h) : You should. He goes to AFC that helps Packers.

packerfanoutwest (23-Apr) : don't care

Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Lions shopping Jameson Williams?

packerfanoutwest (22-Apr) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.

Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat

wpr (22-Apr) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.

wpr (22-Apr) : now 3

Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Who? What?

beast (22-Apr) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?

Martha Careful (21-Apr) : meh

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast

wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.

wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!

dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am

wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days

beast (18-Apr) : 6 days

wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep

dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire

dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that

dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24