2012 Packers roster to 75· Page 2

earthquake
Member

12 years ago

source:

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/24/packers-cut-anthony-hargrove/

Packers cut Hargrove, Herb Taylor, WR Andrew Brewer, S Micah Pellerin, and CB Dion Turner.

Good news for everyone wanting to see Taylor gone.

Apparently they can re-sign Hargove after week 8, he can fulfill his suspension even if he's not on a roster. Though I'm not sure he has shown enough to warrant a spot even then.

blank

beast
Select Member

12 years ago

#12

Apparently they can re-sign Hargove after week 8, he can fulfill his suspension even if he's not on a roster. Though I'm not sure he has shown enough to warrant a spot even then.

Originally Posted by: earthquake

If they wanted him after his suspension then they wouldn't of cut him to start with... he can be put on a suspension list and doesn't count against the 53 man roster list until his suspension was up.

earthquake
Member

12 years ago

#13

If they wanted him after his suspension then they wouldn't of cut him to start with... he can be put on a suspension list and doesn't count against the 53 man roster list until his suspension was up.

Originally Posted by: beast

Yeah I suppose you're right.

Also doh, slow on the new thread button.

blank

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

12 years ago

#14

If they wanted him after his suspension then they wouldn't of cut him to start with... he can be put on a suspension list and doesn't count against the 53 man roster list until his suspension was up.

Originally Posted by: beast

They would if they didn't want to PAY him for those games suspended, right?

nerdmann
Premier Member

12 years ago

#15

I think it was simple because Hargrove was looking bad in his very limited snaps... I don't think it had to do with political or money... just like the other guys cut haven't looked too good ether.

Originally Posted by: beast

Well we wouldn't have to pay him, so why not keep him around? Suppose somebody goes down between now and week 8?

Just seems like a statement is being made, imo.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

DakotaT
Select Member

12 years ago

#16

I think we are like a bunch of old women insisting on conspiracy theories where there are none.

beast
Select Member

12 years ago

#17

They would if they didn't want to PAY him for those games suspended, right?

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

I think the suspension are unpaid suspensions... but I don't know that.

But I think some players might want to be suspended if they were paid suspension... less work for the same amount of money. I think the loss of money is the big thing for the players.

Well we wouldn't have to pay him, so why not keep him around? Suppose somebody goes down between now and week 8?

Just seems like a statement is being made, imo.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

I agree he could of made a safety net in case an injury happen between now and then. But I guess he wasn't showing enough for them to keep him even as a safety net.

But there also have been reports that Hargrove has been getting "frustrated" in practice and might of had a "dust-up" with DL coach Mike Trgovac. (some of the article is edited out so some might go read it (if I linked it correctly)

http://www.jsonline.com/blogs/sports/167380305.html

Over the last week, Hargrove was clearly frustrated with his practice time. In one practice, he kicked his helmet after not getting any reps in the one-on-one pass rush drill.

Article wrote:

He appeared to get in a dust-up with defensive line coach Mike Trgovac, (edit some out) Hargrove seemed to ignore Trgovac's call (edit some out) the two had words on the sideline. (edit some out) Hargrove was the only healthy player not to play against the Bengals.

Article wrote:

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

12 years ago

#18

Originally Posted by: beast

The player doesn't get their paycheck, but the team has to pay the player, which that pay goes to the NFL. At least, to my understanding that's how it's been.

Pack93z
Select Member

12 years ago

#19

All about the roster spot..

"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"

wpr
Preferred Member

12 years ago

#20

New Orleans Saints linebacker Jonathan Vilma was suspended without pay for the entire 2012 season by the NFL, one of four players punished on Wednesday for participating in the team's cash-for-hits bounty system.

Defensive lineman Anthony Hargrove, now with the Green Bay Packers, was suspended for the first half of the 16-game season; Saints defensive end Will Smith was barred for the opening four games; and linebacker Scott Fujita, now with the Cleveland Browns, will miss the first three games. Like Vilma, they were suspended without pay.

ESPN

Zero can you show where it says the money was to be paid to the league? I vaguely remember seeing something like that a year or two ago but not about this incident.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (1h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (1h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (1h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (1h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (2h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (2h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (2h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (2h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (2h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (2h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (2h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (2h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (2h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (2h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (2h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (2h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (2h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (2h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (2h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (2h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (2h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (2h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (2h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (2h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

packerfanoutwest (3h) : falcons are already ahead of us

beast (3h) : Packers will get in

beast (3h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen

packerfanoutwest (3h) : they still are in the playoffs

packerfanoutwest (3h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7

Zero2Cool (4h) : We can say it. We don't play.

Mucky Tundra (6h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints

Mucky Tundra (6h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games

Mucky Tundra (6h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.

buckeyepackfan (6h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.

Mucky Tundra (15h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan

beast (16h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings

bboystyle (16h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in

Mucky Tundra (19h) : Or ties, but let's be real here

Mucky Tundra (19h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses

Mucky Tundra (19h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch

buckeyepackfan (19h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?

Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks

Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.

Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak

beast (21-Dec) : So far the college playoffs have sucked... One team absolutely dominates the other

beast (21-Dec) : Well even if you weren't positive towards a guy, you wouldn't nessarily want to tell the media that (if they don't know about it)

Martha Careful (21-Dec) : I think MLF want Love to look past the end half issues, and feel good about his play. Our coaches generally keep a very positive tone.

beast (21-Dec) : I think a great running game will do that for most QBs

packerfanoutwest (21-Dec) : Coach Matt LaFleur has said quarterback Jordan Love is playing the best football of his career.

beast (21-Dec) : Oh, that's how you keep beating buckeye, with cheating

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS