Free-agent RB Cedric Benson is Green Bay· Page 7

wpr
Preferred Member

12 years ago

Excuse me Father Nick. Your friggin' team is composed almost entirely of convicts, or those that would be convicts if your judges in your state weren't wearing the same brand of goofy deep purple goggles you got.

Gimme a break. Every great once-in- a- while the Pack org ought to be able to dip a toe into the same exact cess-pool your Vikings absolutely immerse themselves in.

Edit--

It must be a real bitch. You as a person are far more relevant to the Packer fans that know you than your actual hoodlum-dysfunctional so-called NFL team. There. That's my compliment, lol

Originally Posted by: dfosterf

He is jealous. He wishes he had a team with so few "indiscretions" he has to drag up ones that happened before they played for GB knowing they won't happen when they are on the team. At least not with the same regularity that the Viking players are caught and convicted.

zombieslayer
Registered

12 years ago

#62

I no longer make fun of Vikings fans. If Brett Lorenzo Favre couldn't win them a Super Bowl, no one can. I think poor VR lost all hope when Brett should have run for the first down and ended the game but instead threw the ball to God knows where and it got picked off.

That was it. That's the closest the Vikings will get to the Super Bowl this decade.

So make fun of us all you want, VR. I don't take offense. I feel your pain. I'm here for you, amigo. 😇

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

DakotaT
Select Member

12 years ago

#63

I'm sure VR is amused by the reactions he's conjured out of us. The only way to truly get under his skin is for the Packers to keep adding to the trophy case. If a dipshit like Cedric Benson helps get us there, well then that's just icing on the cake.

Pack93z
Select Member

12 years ago

#64

I'm sure VR is amused by the reactions he's conjured out of us. The only way to truly get under his skin is for the Packers to keep adding to the trophy case.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT

Yes... I am sure it is viewed already as mission accomplished.. as it should be.

There are risks with signing Benson... one being the league policies and suspensions.

One damn thing I will ever probably source back to Jerry Jones... you don't win on Sundays with all choir boys.

"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

12 years ago

#65

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer

That play hurt vikesrule even more because of how much he admires and adores Brett Favre. That's a little factoid that most aren't aware of, speaking of his love for Brett Favre. Notice how after the 2007 season vikesrule spoke out against the Packers more? It's because his boy was no longer on the team he secretly lusts.

zombieslayer
Registered

12 years ago

#66

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

Yes. I remember him saying that Favre becoming a Viking was his biggest nightmare. He was actually covering up his love for Favre by going to the opposite extreme. Kind of like how a homophobe is more often than not a closet homosexual.

You can't get one past Pop Psychologist Extraordinaire Dr. Zombieslayer. No siree bob. I know what's going on in that ol' head of his, even more than he does.

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

yooperfan
Veteran Member

12 years ago

#67

Why Benson instead of Grant?
Anyone have a reasonable explanation?

flep
Member

12 years ago

#68

I like this pick up.

Looking forward to him running all over the Bears D!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Formed Merseyside Nighthawks. British Champions 1992. Packer fan for 32 years

I feel very wrong now!!!!!!!!!

zombieslayer
Registered

12 years ago

#69

Why Benson instead of Grant?
Anyone have a reasonable explanation?

Originally Posted by: yooperfan

This is a guess, so don't shoot the messenger.

I'm guessing because Benson's a better blocker. Grant is still an above average runner, so maybe his lack of pass protection is his Achilles' Heel?

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

dfosterf
Veteran Member

12 years ago

#70

Why Benson instead of Grant?
Anyone have a reasonable explanation?

Originally Posted by: yooperfan

Maybe the powers that be think he can hit the non-hole (ZBS editorial) faster and harder than Grant. I'm personally good with it, mostly because Grant played this org during the Favre fiasco, and I dig revenge, as I'm somewhat childish about shit like that. 🤣

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (4h) : Could ban beast and I still don't think anyone catches him.

Mucky Tundra (18h) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore

packerfanoutwest (25-Dec) : Feliz Navidad!

Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!

beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁

beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won

Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS