wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
12 years ago
for a team that only lost twice last year there were enough things going wrong on the defensive side of the ball to cause a lot of frustration. Sometimes it may have been Dom's doing. Sometimes it was the players letting the team down. Dom does get a little conservative sometimes but not always. When he came out with his psycho package a couple of years ago that was pretty innovative. But it is only going to work one or two weeks. OCs then have time to watch film and make adjustments.

I have a had time accepting the adage that some tout that it is ok to give up a LOT of yards if the other team doesn't score. I would rather have a defense that gives up 50 yards a game than one that gives up 400 yards. Shut down their offense and you are probably going to win the game. (Unless you fail on ST or give them a lot of turnovers.)
UserPostedImage
Dexter_Sinister
12 years ago

Bend but try not to break, but still break very often. Especially when it matters the most, i.e., 3rd downs/must stop plays.

Originally Posted by: doddpower 



That depended on which quarter it was. They were much better in the first through third quarters. When they didn't have the average 18 point lead.
I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.
beast
12 years ago

Dom Capers needs to step it up - That 3 man pass rush doesn't work-never has

Originally Posted by: dfosterf 



Maybe that's why he didn't use it?
Don't know if it was correct but someone on ESPN said the Packers brought extra guys in the pass rush 2nd most in the NFL only behind the Saints.

If he's a guru, he sucks at it.
He seems to always go very conservative when we are even a little bit ahead. Now I've been told we need to learn how to properly tackle. Where is the accountability as regards our Defensive Coordinator? I forget the actual ranking, but I know suckage when I see it, and his defense sucked.

Sucked Sucked Sucked.

Originally Posted by: dfosterf 



The accountability they're training them to properly tackle now...

There is VERY VERY VERY VERY little a coach can do when the guys up front aren't getting it done and you got not way to change it up. Other than Matthews and Bishop the front 7 got VERY VERY VERY little pressure even when he sent blitzes.

You can change things up and he seemed to try... but it still wasn't changing the fact that the guys up front weren't getting the job done.

Needed more healthy pass rush... Jenkins gone and NT Green didn't take care of himself during the lockout... killed the pass rush and Raji didn't seem able to do to much with out more help.

UserPostedImage
doddpower
12 years ago

Between Peprah playing for Collins

Originally Posted by: Dexter_Sinister 



Peprah replaced Collins? Interesting. And here all this time I thought Burnett was the Packer's free safety after Collins went down.
Porforis
12 years ago
One other point when it comes to giing away a lot more points in the 4th quarter: Becoming more conservative is part of it, but so is the other team becoming more aggressive because they're running out of time, and the defense starting to get tired.
Zero2Cool
12 years ago

No, our defense licked ass last year - and it was an abomination. I don't care how many picks we got. The only that stat that matters is getting off the field on 3rd down - and we couldn't defend 4 yards or 15. Our defense sucked.

And I think Gunny's take on Caper's accountability is completely appropriate.

Originally Posted by: Dakotat 



And that's okay for you to be completely wrong too. The sun will still rise.


The main issue with the Packers defense was tackling. Teams were going to get lots of passing yards no matter what, since the Packers lacked a pass rush and also the offense was putting up near historic numbers. When your team is down by a score and more, your offense abandons the running game and gets pass happy. You'd think that would make it EASIER to get a pass rush, but that just shows how inept the Packers pass rush was.

The yards given up don't bother me much. It's the crappy tackling that pisses me off and its not going to get better. I seen a clip of Jarrett Bush last night where he shoulder bumped someone out of bounds. Tackling needs to be done on every play, in my opinion, so it becomes a habit to tackle properly and to wrap up. Seeing that shoulder bump, I had to control the urge to Nolan Ryan my remote.


Oh, and yes, the three man rush is stupid.
UserPostedImage
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
12 years ago
I think my problem with the 3 man rush is that it is too reactive. Indeed, I think that's my problem with the Packer D in general.

I think the Capers approach is more "read-and-react." Buddy Ryan's 4-6, or in earlier days, the Purple People Eaters or the Lombardi/Hanner/Bengston defense were more attack-and-make-the-other-guy-adjust.

Attack defenses depend on good, but disciplined tackling. Not on the killer highlight-film shot, but sound wrap-up-and-drive-through-the-guy tackling. It doesn't mean freelancing, it means "We're not afraid of you, we're coming through *here* and you have to stop us or you're dead."

Read-and-react depends above all on having more acceleration -- acceleration through the hole the offensive scheme reveals after snap, closing speed if you're in coverage. Speed that sees the hole one guy is leaving and getting there before the other guy closes it. Speed that sees where the guy in front of you is going and beating him there. If you are Nick Collins or Tramon (before injury) or Sir Chuck before last year, it works. And it is the kind of thing that can yield lots of INTS even when you don't have that acceleration edge, because by reading, you see the other guy's mistakes and can take advantage of them.

But if the other guy doesn't make a mistake, and something happens to lose that acceleration edge (aging for Woodson, injury for Collins and Williams, bad tackling technique, you get big plays the other way and the other team moving down the field. And unless the acceleration edge is profound, you don't get sacks and you don't get quarterback pressure.

And the three man rush is the ultimate in read-and-react. Rush three and you're almost guaranteed to give the QB extra time. And because even a weak-noodle quarterback can put more speed on the ball than the fastest DB can run, that means you pretty need an error by the other guy to stop them.

Three man rush = "React, react, react."

I want a defense that is "You react, you react, YOU react."

[grin1]
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Dexter_Sinister
12 years ago

Peprah replaced Collins? Interesting. And here all this time I thought Burnett was the Packer's free safety after Collins went down.

Originally Posted by: doddpower 



The point you missed was that Peprah was starting because Collins was out.
I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
12 years ago

And that's okay for you to be completely wrong too. The sun will still rise.


The main issue with the Packers defense was tackling. Teams were going to get lots of passing yards no matter what, since the Packers lacked a pass rush and also the offense was putting up near historic numbers. When your team is down by a score and more, your offense abandons the running game and gets pass happy. You'd think that would make it EASIER to get a pass rush, but that just shows how inept the Packers pass rush was.

The yards given up don't bother me much. It's the crappy tackling that pisses me off and its not going to get better. I seen a clip of Jarrett Bush last night where he shoulder bumped someone out of bounds. Tackling needs to be done on every play, in my opinion, so it becomes a habit to tackle properly and to wrap up. Seeing that shoulder bump, I had to control the urge to Nolan Ryan my remote.


Oh, and yes, the three man rush is stupid.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



I can tolerant (not like it but tolerate) a bump out of bounds. But I can stand it when I see it in the middle of the field with the ball carrier clearly in control of his balance.
I have been yelling for the coaches to make the players wrap up and tackle the guy for years. Slapping and pulling at the ball is another annoyance. If they hit the ball on their way to tackling, ok. If the second guy their goes for the ball after the first guy wraps up the carrier, ok. But when the first defender tries to reach in and steal the ball while the carrier is going full speed that is not ok. That usually gives them another 5-10 yards. Often more.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
12 years ago

I can tolerant (not like it but tolerate) a bump out of bounds. But I can stand it when I see it in the middle of the field with the ball carrier clearly in control of his balance.
I have been yelling for the coaches to make the players wrap up and tackle the guy for years. Slapping and pulling at the ball is another annoyance. If they hit the ball on their way to tackling, ok. If the second guy their goes for the ball after the first guy wraps up the carrier, ok. But when the first defender tries to reach in and steal the ball while the carrier is going full speed that is not ok. That usually gives them another 5-10 yards. Often more.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



The bump out of bounds I'd be okay with ... if the Packers could tackle properly on a consistent basis. They can not, therefore, I think they should tackle every single time. Get comfortable doing it. Get used to doing it. Do it the right away. I'm reminded of a couple quotes...

Practice does not make perfect. Only perfect practice makes perfect.



Perfection is not attainable, but if we chase perfection we can catch excellence.



I am confident without any numbers to support the statement that if the Packers would have committed 50% less missed tackles, they would have went 19 - 0. I hate, absolutely HATE how poor tackling is in the NFL, and more passionately with the Packers.

I was talking to my dad about tackling the other day. He wasn't the biggest guy either in High School and he said he would take out the legs. He said I was foolish for how I tackled. I did it how I was told I had to, or I'd be on the bench. I wasn't big in High School but I sure as fuck wasn't going to let someone get past me and embarrass me.

Since I've been watching so much Olympics, ... NFL players not being able to tackle is like a swimmer not being able to backstroke!!


FIX THE FUCKING TACKLING!
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
dfosterf (14h) : Hasn"t Bosa missed more games than he has played in the last 3 years?
Mucky Tundra (19h) : He hasn't been too bad when healthy but I don't feel like I ever heard much about when he is
Zero2Cool (20h) : Felt like he was more interested in his body, than football. He flashed more than I expected
Zero2Cool (20h) : When he was coming out, I thought he'd be flash in pan.
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Joey seems so forgettable compared to his brother for some reason
Zero2Cool (21h) : NFL informed teams today that the 2025 salary cap will be roughly $277.5M-$281.5M
Zero2Cool (19-Feb) : Los Angeles Chargers are likely to release DE Joey Bosa this off-season as a cap casualty, per league source.
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : If the exploit is not fixed, we'll see tons of "50 top free agents, 50 perfect NFL team fits: We picked where each should sign in March" lo
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Issue should be solved, database cleaned and held strong working / meeting. Boom!
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : It should be halted now.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : usually spambots are trying to get traffic to shady websites filled with spyware; the two links being spammed were to the Packers website
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : you know when you put it that way combined with the links it was spamming (to the official Packers website)
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Yep. You can do that with holding down ENTER on a command in Console of browser
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : even with the rapid fire posts?
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : I'm not certain it's a bot.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : I've got to go to work soon which is a pity because I'm enthralled by this battle between the bot and Zero
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Yeah, I see what that did. Kind of funny.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : now it's a link to Wes Hodkiezwicz mailbag
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Now they're back with another topic
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : oh lol
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : I have a script that purges them now.
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : 118 Topics with Message.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : what's 118 (besides a number)?
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : They got 118 slapped in there.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : that's why it confused the hell out of me
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Yeah, but this is taking a headline and slapping it into the Packers Talk
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Wasnt there a time guests could post in the help forum?
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : lol good question, kind of impressed!
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : So how is a guest posting?
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Tell them its an emergency
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Working. Meetings.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Lots of fun; the spam goes back 4 or 5 pages by this point
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : I thought you'd look for yourself and put 2 and 2 together lol. I overestimated ya ;)
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : I thought Guests couldnt post?
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : And gosh that's gonna be fun to clean up! hahaa
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Oh. Why not just say that then? Geez.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : check the main forum, seems a spam bot is running amok
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : What?
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Is the Packers online game "Packers Predict" now available for 2024? I can't tell
Zero2Cool (17-Feb) : Bengals planning to Franchise Tag Tamaurice Higgins
Zero2Cool (14-Feb) : Packers are hiring Luke Getsy as senior offensive assistant.
Martha Careful (12-Feb) : I would love to have them both, esp. Crosby, but either might be too expensive.
Zero2Cool (12-Feb) : Keisean Nixon is trying to get Maxx Crosby and Davante Adams lol
Mucky Tundra (11-Feb) : Yeah where did it go?
packerfanoutwest (11-Feb) : or did you resctrict access to that topic?
packerfanoutwest (11-Feb) : why did you remove the Playoff topic?
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : Tua’s old DC won a Super Bowl Year 1 with Tua’s former backup
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : *winning MVP
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : Funny observation I've heard: Carson Wentz was on the sideline for both Eagles Super Bowl wins w/guys supposed to be his back up winning
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : NFL thought it would get more attention week preceding Super Bowl.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / MintBaconDrivel

18-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

18-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

18-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

18-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Feb / Around The NFL / beast

16-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

15-Feb / Around The NFL / beast

15-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

14-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

14-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

13-Feb / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

10-Feb / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.