DakotaT
12 years ago

Yes WE have a say... and when they start adding things for you to pay that you disagree with what then? When you start covering all of these women's birth control... what type of costs are we looking at. Will something fall off that should be covered.

Our socialized health care in Ontario (health care is provincial)covers abortion... it pisses me off that I am forced to pay for free-for-all abortions that we have in Canada. Sex reassignment is also covered. Hell I am pretty sure that tattoo removal is still covered, but for some strange reason we recently stopped covering eye exams. Go figure.

Endometriosis has many treatment options, we only choose the pill because of the secondary benefits of a birth control option. If you are done with having children... I don't many going the pill route to treat endometriosis given the high level of side effects.



Originally Posted by: TheKanataThrilla 



Didn't know you were Canadian. Pretty tough to be a conservative up there. How does tax evasion work there anyway if you have a job and don't own your own business? People who have jobs have a hard time sheltering money in America whereas business owners have many tricks. And what percentage of income is withheld right off the top?
UserPostedImage
TheKanataThrilla
12 years ago

Didn't know you were Canadian. Pretty tough to be a conservative up there. How does tax evasion work there anyway if you have a job and don't own your own business? People who have jobs have a hard time sheltering money in America whereas business owners have many tricks. And what percentage of income is withheld right off the top?

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



Most conservatives in Canada tend to be of the fiscal variety. Not as many so-cons like you see in the Southern US. If I was an American I would probably be in the Ron Paul camp although I am not sold on his position internationally when it comes to the military.

Taxes are tough on income because it is progressive. With all the level of taxation most are taxed at nearly 50% and then we have consumption tax on top of this. It is crazy. We cannot write off our mortgage interest which I believe is available to you guys. It costs us about $40 for a 24 of beer and our dollar is no pretty much on par with you guys. That is sad.

Your healthcare if far from perfect, but I really don't think that Obamacare is the solution and be prepared to see a massive increase to your taxation. Healthcare I believe is the largest component of our provincial tax that we pay. With an aging society it is only going to get worse.

Formo
12 years ago

Most conservatives in Canada tend to be of the fiscal variety. Not as many so-cons like you see in the Southern US. If I was an American I would probably be in the Ron Paul camp although I am not sold on his position internationally when it comes to the military.

Taxes are tough on income because it is progressive. With all the level of taxation most are taxed at nearly 50% and then we have consumption tax on top of this. It is crazy. We cannot write off our mortgage interest which I believe is available to you guys. It costs us about $40 for a 24 of beer and our dollar is no pretty much on par with you guys. That is sad.

Your healthcare if far from perfect, but I really don't think that Obamacare is the solution and be prepared to see a massive increase to your taxation. Healthcare I believe is the largest component of our provincial tax that we pay. With an aging society it is only going to get worse.

Originally Posted by: TheKanataThrilla 



And a perfect example of why socialized healthcare was NEVER the answer..
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Pack93z
12 years ago

And a perfect example of why socialized healthcare was NEVER the answer..

Originally Posted by: Formo 



But what is the correct answer?

Letting the insurance and medical fields out price medical care isn't the answer.

Letting the drug companies rob those in need blindly sure the hell isn't the answer.

Letting some of the population go uninsured and thus hiking the cost for those that carry insurance isn't working.

Telling a sector of the population that you can't afford proper healthcare isn't the answer.

Allowing the lawyers the wiggle room for frivolous litigation suit after suit driving up the providers liability hasn't worked either.

I do agree, allowing the government to oversee it will only layer the costs and the money grab some more.

Simply put.. we the people as a whole are consuming ourselves consistently.

So again.. what is the correct answer?

I am convinced, just as history has proven again and again, every civilization will rise and will fall. And we are not on the uptick.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Cheesey
12 years ago

Because they might actually want kids. Don't correlate birth control with never wanting kids, which a vasectomy does to a man. Many women want to wait until they graduate from college before having kids. Others want to wait until they build a new house and settle down. A number of reasons exist why people don't choose to have kids at certain points in time. This idea that women on birth control just pop the pill so they can go out and pop something else is simply not true.

Originally Posted by: porky88 




So she might want kids in the future, but not now. Again, why is it society's responsibility to pay for it?
Even if it's for medical reasons, not just to keep from getting pregnant, why should she and millions of others get the meds for free?
THAT is the REAL question. So far, i haven't seen any answer to that question.
I think i should get all the meds i need-to stay alive-for free too. Shouldn't i?
If painful monthly periods is the reason, shouldn't weekly horribly painful migraines also be included?
It's one sided.....as it always seems to be.
UserPostedImage
Formo
12 years ago

But what is the correct answer?

Letting the insurance and medical fields out price medical care isn't the answer.

Letting the drug companies rob those in need blindly sure the hell isn't the answer.

Letting some of the population go uninsured and thus hiking the cost for those that carry insurance isn't working.

Telling a sector of the population that you can't afford proper healthcare isn't the answer.

Allowing the lawyers the wiggle room for frivolous litigation suit after suit driving up the providers liability hasn't worked either.

I do agree, allowing the government to oversee it will only layer the costs and the money grab some more.

Simply put.. we the people as a whole are consuming ourselves consistently.

So again.. what is the correct answer?

I am convinced, just as history has proven again and again, every civilization will rise and will fall. And we are not on the uptick.

Originally Posted by: Pack93z 



I never said I had the RIGHT answer. but I bet that if you hammer the pharmaceutical companies' deals with practices to push shitty RXs on people and stop the practices' price gauging of insurance companies would help.

I've talked about the HSA insurance coverage here before. And I think that system, with some minor tweaks and balances, is vastly superior to Obamacare/current system we have in place. The HSA forces the consumers (the people) to actually THINK about what they are doing with their medical practices.

UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
12 years ago

I never said I had the RIGHT answer. but I bet that if you hammer the pharmaceutical companies' deals with practices to push shitty RXs on people and stop the practices' price gauging of insurance companies would help.

I've talked about the HSA insurance coverage here before. And I think that system, with some minor tweaks and balances, is vastly superior to Obamacare/current system we have in place. The HSA forces the consumers (the people) to actually THINK about what they are doing with their medical practices.

Originally Posted by: Formo 




I have the HSA plan. I recommend them to my clients. That said I still remember when Billery was trying to ram through their heath care "reform" in the 90's. Back then it was the MSA. It was the precursor to the HSA.

You probably recall their reform was not getting very far. One of the Congressmen from my area was at a meeting with Hillery. I think he said they were actually sitting at the same table for lunch. He said that he favored improving the MSA and making it more consumer friendly instead of ripping everything apart and starting all over.

Hillery looked right at him in front of other Congressman and and said that "They" (the Democratic party patriarchs)did not trust the general public to make the right decisions when it comes to health care. That the federal government needs to be the one that tells the people what treatment they need to get.

I don't see that the "Party of the People" has changed their mind set very much in the past 20 years.



UserPostedImage
Formo
12 years ago

I have the HSA plan. I recommend them to my clients. That said I still remember when Billery was trying to ram through their heath care "reform" in the 90's. Back then it was the MSA. It was the precursor to the HSA.

You probably recall their reform was not getting very far. One of the Congressmen from my area was at a meeting with Hillery. I think he said they were actually sitting at the same table for lunch. He said that he favored improving the MSA and making it more consumer friendly instead of ripping everything apart and starting all over.

Hillery looked right at him in front of other Congressman and and said that "They" (the Democratic party patriarchs)did not trust the general public to make the right decisions when it comes to health care. That the federal government needs to be the one that tells the people what treatment they need to get.

I don't see that the "Party of the People" has changed their mind set very much in the past 20 years.


Originally Posted by: wpr 



Interesting. I had an HSA plan when I worked at the foundry. It was the ONLY way any insurance company would insure us (the employees) because of the danger. It turned out to be a great plan for me as I hardly ever went to the docs, only for maintenance checkups. Unfortunately I was laid off and my HSA account still is sitting inactive.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
4PackGirl
12 years ago
my parents (farmers) budgeted every year for their own health insurance. they had no choice. they did it. now i'm not sure with the economy the way it is that alot of people can afford health insurance. my husband got on a group plan with blue cross/blue shield. he pays $120/month - no Rx coverage & has a $5,000 deductible. basically it's for a catastrophic incident. so until he reaches that deductible he's 'self pay' & gets slammed big time by the doctors, often paying at least twice what someone with insurance coverage would pay. it sucks but we deal with it.
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
12 years ago

But what is the correct answer?

Letting the insurance and medical fields out price medical care isn't the answer.

Letting the drug companies rob those in need blindly sure the hell isn't the answer.

Letting some of the population go uninsured and thus hiking the cost for those that carry insurance isn't working.

Telling a sector of the population that you can't afford proper healthcare isn't the answer.

Allowing the lawyers the wiggle room for frivolous litigation suit after suit driving up the providers liability hasn't worked either.

I do agree, allowing the government to oversee it will only layer the costs and the money grab some more.

Simply put.. we the people as a whole are consuming ourselves consistently.

So again.. what is the correct answer?

I am convinced, just as history has proven again and again, every civilization will rise and will fall. And we are not on the uptick.

Originally Posted by: Pack93z 



1. Even with all of the above, health care in America is *STILL* the best in human history. Especially if you account for biggies (rarely counted by anyone, but incredibly significant) of life expectancy, quality of food, and, IMO the biggest of all -- childhood nutrition. Go back any multiple of 25 or 50 years and you'll discover that all the whining about junk food, unwed parents,etc. notwithstanding, today is the best it's ever been.
Most complaining about health care, including my own, demands that which has never been systematically available to everyone. But guess what, it's never been because no one has figured out how to get it (apart from stealing from others to pay for it. In the bad old days, the king stole wealth from the peasants; now, we've been conned into believing we can magically become healthier by stealing from each other via taxes and good government planning.

2. The notion that government can somehow find a way to do what has never been possible before I see as absolutely ludicrous. Doing what has never been possible before demands productive innovation. The *only* thing that government has ever demonstrated it is able to do consistently better than someone else: (i) coerced transfer payments; (ii) national defense; and, sometimes, (iii) courts and the adjudication of contract disputes.

3. I'm not a fan of big health care institutions.. Having taught for 20+ years, I have some knowledge of the average thinking and quantitative quality of those who go into insurance. Some of those former students I know were and are fantastic; far too many of them come from the bottom third, and are people I wouldn't trust a penny of my money with, much less my health care if I could avoid it.

So I'm not going to sit here and claim Behemoth Private Hospital and Unbenevolent Insurance Company are saviors. They're not.

I will only say that prior attempts to improve the way they do things through state through regulation almost always makes things even worse. And it ALWAYS makes the total bill more expensive. Just look at all the paper generated by insurance claims, reimbursement, policy terms, etc., etc. -- THAT is the second big reason why health care is so damn expensive today. It's why many of the rich who pay for "concierge care" can get far more care at a price lower than the rest of us schmos would ever get did we try to buy it through the system we deal with: the people who care for it don't have to mess around with a few dozen separate bureaucracies all of them demanding forms filled out to satisfy CPAs, lawyers, health care consultants, and assorted other experts at pushing paper and using the Excel chart templates.

The biggest reason we have went down this road to mega-hospitals with their snazzy hand-held buzzers for patients sitting in their firing-squad-styled waiting rooms, mega-mega-insurance companies with Press-1-to-hold, Press-2-to-disconnect, Press-3-to-wait-for-me-to-learn-how-to-pass-the-buck, and doctors charging 100+ bucks for ten minutes and a glance at the PDR on their blackberry? Big companies are the only ones who can afford all the compliance shit and CPAs and high end lawyers and the like.

Me, I'd ban ALL government-provided health care except that provided to necessary government employees. And my list of necessary government employees would be very short: health care to military personnel "in harm's way" and to veterans for disabilities caused from being in harm's way, trial court judges, and those who maintain sewer and water systems. No one else.

And I'd make all elected officials and appellate court judges would be explicitly banned from EVER getting government-paid benefits of any kind, and would be required to pay a pro-rata share of the care provided to anyone else (that I didn't just specify) that they might classify as "necessary employees.


And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (1h) : The Seattle Seahawks defeat the Chicago Bears 6-3. Jason Myers had 6 RBIs for Seattle while Cairo Santos had 3 RBI for Chicago
beast (2h) : Not nessarily, he might of been injured either way. He's playing about 50% of the games the last 4 years
Zero2Cool (9h) : If they'd been more patient with him, he'd be back already. Putting him out there vs Bears caused him to tweak it and here we are.
packerfanoutwest (9h) : well this is his last season with the PAck, book it
beast (10h) : Sounds like no Alexander (again), I'm wondering if his time with the Packers is done
Zero2Cool (17h) : Could ban beast and I still don't think anyone catches him.
Mucky Tundra (26-Dec) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore
packerfanoutwest (25-Dec) : Feliz Navidad!
Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!
beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

25-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Dec / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.