Wade
  • Wade
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Veteran Member
13 years ago

Just have two points

First, she allegedly spends 3K on contraceptives because of her sex life. Perhaps she has just one partner and they happen to have a very healthy sex life. I don’t know the whole story, but it’s not my place to judge. Frankly, it’s none of my business or anyone else’s.

I don't know if this was part of the discussion here, but the Blunt amendment isn’t any better. How many employers would find religion or spirituality overnight based on that bills passage? I don’t have a moral objection to most of this stuff, but that doesn’t mean I wouldn’t exploit a law to save money. I know, it's a prick move, but many bosses are pricks. That’s my point there. We really need to write our laws better instead of writing them to impress voters. That is such a vague way to write a law.

I often joke that one party is dumb and the other is dumber. I just have trouble figuring out which. This sort of stuff makes it a little easier to figure them out.

Originally Posted by: porky88 



Actually, what we need to do is stop writing laws.

As long as people have been around, they've had stupid laws. America isn't doing anything new in this regard.

What America is doing wrong is writing laws too damn much. We don't just write stupid laws. We let government...no, we encourage government to write hundreds of thousands of pages of fed/state/local laws every damned year.

Of course the politicos write laws to impress voters. They're high-paid prostitutes and hired guns. And high-paid prostitutes and hired guns get paid by how well they impress their clients.

Politicians might be scum. (At least I think they are.) But they're not the real problem.

We are.


And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
DakotaT
  • DakotaT
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Select Member
13 years ago

But that is the whole point: I don't obsess about the past, and I don't hate anyone. If they choose to hate me, that is their own problem.

And yes, regardless of how others may view their sincerely held convictions (I think the vast majority of their teachings on sex are absurd), the Catholic Church's freedom to teach and practice according to its conscience is to be protected under the Constitution. "Congress shall make no law . . . prohibiting the free exercise" of religion. It doesn't add the caveat, "unless the majority thinks their practices are outmoded, reactionary, or illogical."

If having your birth control covered by health insurance is that important for you, don't work for an organization you know full well has the sincerely-held belief that birth control is sinful. No one is forcing anyone to work for the Church.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 



But does a religious organization have the right to impose their beliefs on you as their employee on a medical issue?

Like I said earlier, all this is about is laying groundwork for the next type of coverage the right wing wants to weasil out of having to pay. People can attach tangents to anything (lawyer tricks) - rarely to we ever hit a problem head on.
UserPostedImage
DakotaT
  • DakotaT
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Select Member
13 years ago
I guess his heiness Rush has now apologize for using a poor choice of words. I would just venture a guess that major adverstisers pulling their adds from his show helped to swallow his pride. What I'd like to see is the owner of his network shows some character and fire this stone age bully. Doubtful, very doubtful that will happen.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
13 years ago

I guess his heiness Rush has now apologize for using a poor choice of words. I would just venture a guess that major adverstisers pulling their adds from his show helped to swallow his pride. What I'd like to see is the owner of his network shows some character and fire this stone age bully. Doubtful, very doubtful that will happen.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



I don't understand why the advertisers are upset. We they surprised in some manner? Did they not have any idea of how inflammatory Rush can be? I have not listened to him in more than 10 years because I have been fed up with him and his hate messages for a very long time.

It is people like Rush that has pushed me back from the conservative edge to being a more moderate Republican. I do not want to be lumped into the same class as they are.
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
  • Cheesey
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Preferred Member
13 years ago

Porky for the most part it is not one's business. But when she makes a statement publicly about her sex life it is our business.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



Also, when she expects someone else to pay for it, it becomes our business.
If she's having sex with ONE guy, why can't he get a vasectomy? If it's LOTS of guys.....well....back in my day we had a name for girls like that. (I call guys that screw around the same thing. So it's NOT "sex discrimination". It's calling it what it is).

I consider myself a conservative. Not the "heartless non caring" kind. Not all conservatives are like that. Just as not all liberals are like Michael Moore.
Unfortunately, we get lumped into one catagory.

Where does it all stop? Like i have said, she wants (and got) birth control pills for free. What group will come up next and DEMAND their stuff for free? Like i said with the asthma, and was stated by others on here also, THAT is LIFE OR DEATH. Yet we don't get it for free.
I don't even want to add up what all my meds cost, as i think it would push my already weak heart to a heart attack.

I don't hate liberals (even though they all seem to hate me). I disagree with their political beliefs, but i think they are just mislead, not "evil".
It's funny how if you single out ONE, like this particular woman, I get attacked like i'm some kind of monster.
All i did was state my opinions. Agree with me or disagree, everyone has the right to their opinions.
UserPostedImage
TheKanataThrilla
13 years ago

But does a religious organization have the right to impose their beliefs on you as their employee on a medical issue?

Like I said earlier, all this is about is laying groundwork for the next type of coverage the right wing wants to weasil out of having to pay. People can attach tangents to anything (lawyer tricks) - rarely to we ever hit a problem head on.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



Since when is somebody's sex life a medical issue?

Should they be covering lubricants, sex toys, condoms, etc? One can argue that providing birth control gives a false sense of medical security because although one doesn't get pregnant however you are not protected from STDs.

We will no doubt hear the "regulating the period" argument. I call these people liars. If you are using birth control pills with all the side effect risks just to have a predictable period date you are nuts... or a liar.

And I don't want to come off as a right wing crazy guy. I'm a Libertarian... so if you want to fuck your brains out like I did in University great, but don't expect me as a tax payer to pay for it.

The fallout for socialized health care that you will encounter if you my American friends go down that route is health care will start to be used as a caveat to remove your personal freedoms and taxation will be used as a social engineering stick.

DakotaT
  • DakotaT
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Select Member
13 years ago
Sorry TKT, if you are in a group health care plan, it isn't your money, it is our money and you don't have a say - we have a say.

And just so you know, Mrs. Dakota gets most of her birth control pills covered for 2 reasons - treating endometriosis, and regulating a heavy flow period with excruciating cramps.

I totally agree with fucking your brains out when you are young experience - and the more the better. I personally used the pull out and shoot method - or when I was looking for some sexual education, went to the bars where the Cougars lived and rolled the dice.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
13 years ago

Since when is somebody's sex life a medical issue?

Should they be covering lubricants, sex toys, condoms, etc? One can argue that providing birth control gives a false sense of medical security because although one doesn't get pregnant however you are not protected from STDs.

We will no doubt hear the "regulating the period" argument. I call these people liars. If you are using birth control pills with all the side effect risks just to have a predictable period date you are nuts... or a liar.

And I don't want to come off as a right wing crazy guy. I'm a Libertarian... so if you want to fuck your brains out like I did in University great, but don't expect me as a tax payer to pay for it.

The fallout for socialized health care that you will encounter if you my American friends go down that route is health care will start to be used as a caveat to remove your personal freedoms and taxation will be used as a social engineering stick.

Originally Posted by: TheKanataThrilla 



When one month could happen in only 12-15 days and the next month after 45 or 60 days you will understand why women DO use the pill to regulate along with trying to end the more severe pains and heavy flows. (sometimes 2 week or more for my wife) This happened to both my wife and my daughter.
UserPostedImage
porky88
  • porky88
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Veteran Member
13 years ago

If she's having sex with ONE guy, why can't he get a vasectomy?

Originally Posted by: Cheesey 


Because they might actually want kids. Don't correlate birth control with never wanting kids, which a vasectomy does to a man. Many women want to wait until they graduate from college before having kids. Others want to wait until they build a new house and settle down. A number of reasons exist why people don't choose to have kids at certain points in time. This idea that women on birth control just pop the pill so they can go out and pop something else is simply not true.
TheKanataThrilla
13 years ago

Sorry TKT, if you are in a group health care plan, it isn't your money, it is our money and you don't have a say - we have a say.

And just so you know, Mrs. Dakota gets most of her birth control pills covered for 2 reasons - treating endometriosis, and regulating a heavy flow period with excruciating cramps.

I totally agree with fucking your brains out when you are young experience - and the more the better. I personally used the pull out and shoot method - or when I was looking for some sexual education, went to the bars where the Cougars lived and rolled the dice.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



Yes WE have a say... and when they start adding things for you to pay that you disagree with what then? When you start covering all of these women's birth control... what type of costs are we looking at. Will something fall off that should be covered.

Our socialized health care in Ontario (health care is provincial)covers abortion... it pisses me off that I am forced to pay for free-for-all abortions that we have in Canada. Sex reassignment is also covered. Hell I am pretty sure that tattoo removal is still covered, but for some strange reason we recently stopped covering eye exams. Go figure.

Endometriosis has many treatment options, we only choose the pill because of the secondary benefits of a birth control option. If you are done with having children... I don't many going the pill route to treat endometriosis given the high level of side effects.



DakotaT
  • DakotaT
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Select Member
13 years ago

Yes WE have a say... and when they start adding things for you to pay that you disagree with what then? When you start covering all of these women's birth control... what type of costs are we looking at. Will something fall off that should be covered.

Our socialized health care in Ontario (health care is provincial)covers abortion... it pisses me off that I am forced to pay for free-for-all abortions that we have in Canada. Sex reassignment is also covered. Hell I am pretty sure that tattoo removal is still covered, but for some strange reason we recently stopped covering eye exams. Go figure.

Endometriosis has many treatment options, we only choose the pill because of the secondary benefits of a birth control option. If you are done with having children... I don't many going the pill route to treat endometriosis given the high level of side effects.



Originally Posted by: TheKanataThrilla 



Didn't know you were Canadian. Pretty tough to be a conservative up there. How does tax evasion work there anyway if you have a job and don't own your own business? People who have jobs have a hard time sheltering money in America whereas business owners have many tricks. And what percentage of income is withheld right off the top?
UserPostedImage
TheKanataThrilla
13 years ago

Didn't know you were Canadian. Pretty tough to be a conservative up there. How does tax evasion work there anyway if you have a job and don't own your own business? People who have jobs have a hard time sheltering money in America whereas business owners have many tricks. And what percentage of income is withheld right off the top?

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



Most conservatives in Canada tend to be of the fiscal variety. Not as many so-cons like you see in the Southern US. If I was an American I would probably be in the Ron Paul camp although I am not sold on his position internationally when it comes to the military.

Taxes are tough on income because it is progressive. With all the level of taxation most are taxed at nearly 50% and then we have consumption tax on top of this. It is crazy. We cannot write off our mortgage interest which I believe is available to you guys. It costs us about $40 for a 24 of beer and our dollar is no pretty much on par with you guys. That is sad.

Your healthcare if far from perfect, but I really don't think that Obamacare is the solution and be prepared to see a massive increase to your taxation. Healthcare I believe is the largest component of our provincial tax that we pay. With an aging society it is only going to get worse.

Formo
  • Formo
  • 61.75% (Friendly)
  • Veteran Member
13 years ago

Most conservatives in Canada tend to be of the fiscal variety. Not as many so-cons like you see in the Southern US. If I was an American I would probably be in the Ron Paul camp although I am not sold on his position internationally when it comes to the military.

Taxes are tough on income because it is progressive. With all the level of taxation most are taxed at nearly 50% and then we have consumption tax on top of this. It is crazy. We cannot write off our mortgage interest which I believe is available to you guys. It costs us about $40 for a 24 of beer and our dollar is no pretty much on par with you guys. That is sad.

Your healthcare if far from perfect, but I really don't think that Obamacare is the solution and be prepared to see a massive increase to your taxation. Healthcare I believe is the largest component of our provincial tax that we pay. With an aging society it is only going to get worse.

Originally Posted by: TheKanataThrilla 



And a perfect example of why socialized healthcare was NEVER the answer..
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Pack93z
  • Pack93z
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Select Member
13 years ago

And a perfect example of why socialized healthcare was NEVER the answer..

Originally Posted by: Formo 



But what is the correct answer?

Letting the insurance and medical fields out price medical care isn't the answer.

Letting the drug companies rob those in need blindly sure the hell isn't the answer.

Letting some of the population go uninsured and thus hiking the cost for those that carry insurance isn't working.

Telling a sector of the population that you can't afford proper healthcare isn't the answer.

Allowing the lawyers the wiggle room for frivolous litigation suit after suit driving up the providers liability hasn't worked either.

I do agree, allowing the government to oversee it will only layer the costs and the money grab some more.

Simply put.. we the people as a whole are consuming ourselves consistently.

So again.. what is the correct answer?

I am convinced, just as history has proven again and again, every civilization will rise and will fall. And we are not on the uptick.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Cheesey
  • Cheesey
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Preferred Member
13 years ago

Because they might actually want kids. Don't correlate birth control with never wanting kids, which a vasectomy does to a man. Many women want to wait until they graduate from college before having kids. Others want to wait until they build a new house and settle down. A number of reasons exist why people don't choose to have kids at certain points in time. This idea that women on birth control just pop the pill so they can go out and pop something else is simply not true.

Originally Posted by: porky88 




So she might want kids in the future, but not now. Again, why is it society's responsibility to pay for it?
Even if it's for medical reasons, not just to keep from getting pregnant, why should she and millions of others get the meds for free?
THAT is the REAL question. So far, i haven't seen any answer to that question.
I think i should get all the meds i need-to stay alive-for free too. Shouldn't i?
If painful monthly periods is the reason, shouldn't weekly horribly painful migraines also be included?
It's one sided.....as it always seems to be.
UserPostedImage
Formo
  • Formo
  • 61.75% (Friendly)
  • Veteran Member
13 years ago

But what is the correct answer?

Letting the insurance and medical fields out price medical care isn't the answer.

Letting the drug companies rob those in need blindly sure the hell isn't the answer.

Letting some of the population go uninsured and thus hiking the cost for those that carry insurance isn't working.

Telling a sector of the population that you can't afford proper healthcare isn't the answer.

Allowing the lawyers the wiggle room for frivolous litigation suit after suit driving up the providers liability hasn't worked either.

I do agree, allowing the government to oversee it will only layer the costs and the money grab some more.

Simply put.. we the people as a whole are consuming ourselves consistently.

So again.. what is the correct answer?

I am convinced, just as history has proven again and again, every civilization will rise and will fall. And we are not on the uptick.

Originally Posted by: Pack93z 



I never said I had the RIGHT answer. but I bet that if you hammer the pharmaceutical companies' deals with practices to push shitty RXs on people and stop the practices' price gauging of insurance companies would help.

I've talked about the HSA insurance coverage here before. And I think that system, with some minor tweaks and balances, is vastly superior to Obamacare/current system we have in place. The HSA forces the consumers (the people) to actually THINK about what they are doing with their medical practices.

UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
wpr
  • wpr
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
13 years ago

I never said I had the RIGHT answer. but I bet that if you hammer the pharmaceutical companies' deals with practices to push shitty RXs on people and stop the practices' price gauging of insurance companies would help.

I've talked about the HSA insurance coverage here before. And I think that system, with some minor tweaks and balances, is vastly superior to Obamacare/current system we have in place. The HSA forces the consumers (the people) to actually THINK about what they are doing with their medical practices.

Originally Posted by: Formo 




I have the HSA plan. I recommend them to my clients. That said I still remember when Billery was trying to ram through their heath care "reform" in the 90's. Back then it was the MSA. It was the precursor to the HSA.

You probably recall their reform was not getting very far. One of the Congressmen from my area was at a meeting with Hillery. I think he said they were actually sitting at the same table for lunch. He said that he favored improving the MSA and making it more consumer friendly instead of ripping everything apart and starting all over.

Hillery looked right at him in front of other Congressman and and said that "They" (the Democratic party patriarchs)did not trust the general public to make the right decisions when it comes to health care. That the federal government needs to be the one that tells the people what treatment they need to get.

I don't see that the "Party of the People" has changed their mind set very much in the past 20 years.



UserPostedImage
Formo
  • Formo
  • 61.75% (Friendly)
  • Veteran Member
13 years ago

I have the HSA plan. I recommend them to my clients. That said I still remember when Billery was trying to ram through their heath care "reform" in the 90's. Back then it was the MSA. It was the precursor to the HSA.

You probably recall their reform was not getting very far. One of the Congressmen from my area was at a meeting with Hillery. I think he said they were actually sitting at the same table for lunch. He said that he favored improving the MSA and making it more consumer friendly instead of ripping everything apart and starting all over.

Hillery looked right at him in front of other Congressman and and said that "They" (the Democratic party patriarchs)did not trust the general public to make the right decisions when it comes to health care. That the federal government needs to be the one that tells the people what treatment they need to get.

I don't see that the "Party of the People" has changed their mind set very much in the past 20 years.


Originally Posted by: wpr 



Interesting. I had an HSA plan when I worked at the foundry. It was the ONLY way any insurance company would insure us (the employees) because of the danger. It turned out to be a great plan for me as I hardly ever went to the docs, only for maintenance checkups. Unfortunately I was laid off and my HSA account still is sitting inactive.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
4PackGirl
13 years ago
my parents (farmers) budgeted every year for their own health insurance. they had no choice. they did it. now i'm not sure with the economy the way it is that alot of people can afford health insurance. my husband got on a group plan with blue cross/blue shield. he pays $120/month - no Rx coverage & has a $5,000 deductible. basically it's for a catastrophic incident. so until he reaches that deductible he's 'self pay' & gets slammed big time by the doctors, often paying at least twice what someone with insurance coverage would pay. it sucks but we deal with it.
Wade
  • Wade
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Veteran Member
13 years ago

But what is the correct answer?

Letting the insurance and medical fields out price medical care isn't the answer.

Letting the drug companies rob those in need blindly sure the hell isn't the answer.

Letting some of the population go uninsured and thus hiking the cost for those that carry insurance isn't working.

Telling a sector of the population that you can't afford proper healthcare isn't the answer.

Allowing the lawyers the wiggle room for frivolous litigation suit after suit driving up the providers liability hasn't worked either.

I do agree, allowing the government to oversee it will only layer the costs and the money grab some more.

Simply put.. we the people as a whole are consuming ourselves consistently.

So again.. what is the correct answer?

I am convinced, just as history has proven again and again, every civilization will rise and will fall. And we are not on the uptick.

Originally Posted by: Pack93z 



1. Even with all of the above, health care in America is *STILL* the best in human history. Especially if you account for biggies (rarely counted by anyone, but incredibly significant) of life expectancy, quality of food, and, IMO the biggest of all -- childhood nutrition. Go back any multiple of 25 or 50 years and you'll discover that all the whining about junk food, unwed parents,etc. notwithstanding, today is the best it's ever been.
Most complaining about health care, including my own, demands that which has never been systematically available to everyone. But guess what, it's never been because no one has figured out how to get it (apart from stealing from others to pay for it. In the bad old days, the king stole wealth from the peasants; now, we've been conned into believing we can magically become healthier by stealing from each other via taxes and good government planning.

2. The notion that government can somehow find a way to do what has never been possible before I see as absolutely ludicrous. Doing what has never been possible before demands productive innovation. The *only* thing that government has ever demonstrated it is able to do consistently better than someone else: (i) coerced transfer payments; (ii) national defense; and, sometimes, (iii) courts and the adjudication of contract disputes.

3. I'm not a fan of big health care institutions.. Having taught for 20+ years, I have some knowledge of the average thinking and quantitative quality of those who go into insurance. Some of those former students I know were and are fantastic; far too many of them come from the bottom third, and are people I wouldn't trust a penny of my money with, much less my health care if I could avoid it.

So I'm not going to sit here and claim Behemoth Private Hospital and Unbenevolent Insurance Company are saviors. They're not.

I will only say that prior attempts to improve the way they do things through state through regulation almost always makes things even worse. And it ALWAYS makes the total bill more expensive. Just look at all the paper generated by insurance claims, reimbursement, policy terms, etc., etc. -- THAT is the second big reason why health care is so damn expensive today. It's why many of the rich who pay for "concierge care" can get far more care at a price lower than the rest of us schmos would ever get did we try to buy it through the system we deal with: the people who care for it don't have to mess around with a few dozen separate bureaucracies all of them demanding forms filled out to satisfy CPAs, lawyers, health care consultants, and assorted other experts at pushing paper and using the Excel chart templates.

The biggest reason we have went down this road to mega-hospitals with their snazzy hand-held buzzers for patients sitting in their firing-squad-styled waiting rooms, mega-mega-insurance companies with Press-1-to-hold, Press-2-to-disconnect, Press-3-to-wait-for-me-to-learn-how-to-pass-the-buck, and doctors charging 100+ bucks for ten minutes and a glance at the PDR on their blackberry? Big companies are the only ones who can afford all the compliance shit and CPAs and high end lawyers and the like.

Me, I'd ban ALL government-provided health care except that provided to necessary government employees. And my list of necessary government employees would be very short: health care to military personnel "in harm's way" and to veterans for disabilities caused from being in harm's way, trial court judges, and those who maintain sewer and water systems. No one else.

And I'd make all elected officials and appellate court judges would be explicitly banned from EVER getting government-paid benefits of any kind, and would be required to pay a pro-rata share of the care provided to anyone else (that I didn't just specify) that they might classify as "necessary employees.


And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Fan Shout
beast (48m) : Packershome going to the Whiteout unis again
Zero2Cool (6h) : Oh wait, they got Cam Ward. 1st overall right? haha oops
Zero2Cool (6h) : They could send Packers a 1st for a QB they are familiar with
Zero2Cool (6h) : Titans QB Will Levis to have season-ending shoulder surgery
Zero2Cool (19-Jul) : Their season did kind of start there, so 🤷
dfosterf (19-Jul) : Eagles put an engraved Brazil flag on their super bowl rings
Zero2Cool (18-Jul) : Benton unsigned no more
Zero2Cool (17-Jul) : That's good analysis, yes you are getting old. It'd a blessing!
dfosterf (14-Jul) : *analysis* gettin' old
dfosterf (14-Jul) : One of the best analyisis I"ve ever watched at this time of an offseason
dfosterf (14-Jul) : Andy Herman interviewed Warren Sharp on his Pack a day podcast
packerfanoutwest (10-Jul) : Us Padres fans love it....But it'll be a Dodgers/Yankees World Series
Zero2Cool (9-Jul) : Brewers sweep Dodgers. Awesome
Mucky Tundra (6-Jul) : And James Flanigan is the grandson of Packers Super Bowl winner Jim Flanigan Sr.
Mucky Tundra (6-Jul) : Jerome Bettis and Jim Flanigans sons as well!
Zero2Cool (6-Jul) : Thomas Davis Jr is OLB, not WR. Oops.
Zero2Cool (6-Jul) : Larry Fitzgeral and Thomas Davis sons too. WR's as well.
Mucky Tundra (5-Jul) : Kaydon Finley, son of Jermichael Finley, commits to Notre Dame
dfosterf (3-Jul) : Make sure to send my props to him! A plus move!
Zero2Cool (3-Jul) : My cousin, yes.
dfosterf (3-Jul) : That was your brother the GB press gazette referenced with the red cross draft props thing, yes?
Zero2Cool (2-Jul) : Packers gonna unveil new throwback helmet in few weeks.
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : I know it's Kleiman but this stuff writes itself
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : "Make sure she signs the NDA before asking for a Happy Ending!"
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : @NFL_DovKleiman Powerful: Deshaun Watson is taking Shedeur Sanders 'under his wing' as a mentor to the Browns QBs
Zero2Cool (30-Jun) : Dolphins get (back) Minkah Fitzpatrick in trade
Zero2Cool (30-Jun) : Steelers land Jalen Ramsey via Trade
dfosterf (26-Jun) : I think it would be great to have someone like Tom Grossi or Andy Herman on the Board of Directors so he/they could inform us
dfosterf (26-Jun) : Fair enough, WPR. Thing is, I have been a long time advocate to at least have some inkling of the dynamics within the board.
wpr (26-Jun) : 1st world owners/stockholders problems dfosterf.
Martha Careful (25-Jun) : I would have otherwise admirably served
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Also, no more provision for a write-in candidate, so Martha is off the table at least for this year
dfosterf (25-Jun) : You do have to interpret the boring fine print, but all stockholders all see he is on the ballot
dfosterf (25-Jun) : It also says he is subject to another ballot in 2028. I recall nothing of this nature with Murphy
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy is on my ballot subject to me penciling him in as a no.
dfosterf (25-Jun) : I thought it used to be we voted for the whatever they called the 45, and then they voted for the seven, and then they voted for Mark Murphy
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Because I was too lazy to change my address, I haven't voted fot years until this year
dfosterf (25-Jun) : of the folks that run this team. I do not recall Mark Murphy being subject to our vote.
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy yay or nay is on the pre-approved ballot that we always approve because we are uninformed and lazy, along with all the rest
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Weird question. Very esoteric. For stockholders. Also lengthy. Sorry. Offseason.
Zero2Cool (25-Jun) : Maybe wicked wind chill made it worse?
Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : And then he signs with Cleveland in the offseason
Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : @SharpFootball WR Diontae Johnson just admitted he refused to enter a game in 41° weather last year in Baltimore because he felt “ice cold”
Zero2Cool (24-Jun) : Yawn. Rodgers says he is "pretty sure" this be final season.
Zero2Cool (23-Jun) : PFT claims Packers are having extension talks with Zach Tom, Quay Walker.
Mucky Tundra (20-Jun) : GB-Minnesota 2004 Wild Card game popped up on my YouTube page....UGH
beast (20-Jun) : Hmm 🤔 re-signing Walker before Tom? Sounds highly questionable to me.
Mucky Tundra (19-Jun) : One person on Twitter=cannon law
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Well, to ONE person on Tweeter
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : According to Tweeter
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
49m / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

18-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

15-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

14-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

10-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

10-Jul / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

6-Jul / Random Babble / Martha Careful

4-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

2-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

2-Jul / Fantasy Sports Talk / dfosterf

1-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.