Would Ted Thompson Take Another Shot At Jenkins?· Page 4

zombieslayer
Registered

12 years ago

He is not coming off a pretty good year. He didn't have a sack at all in the last 10 or 11 games after coming out like a ball on fire getting all his sacks in the first 4-5 games.

Everything else you said I completely agree with and I know that will make you sleep gooder tonight! haha

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

Yeah but did you watch the Eagles games? It probably went like this - Jenkins starts the season on fire. Opposing OCs crap in their pants and realize they have to double up on Jenkins. Jenkins stats decline.

Let's not forget that Raji wasn't drawing double teams. Nobody was scared of him.

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

Rios39
Member Topic Starter

12 years ago

#32

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer

They were playing the wide 9 in the Dline at the start trying to get a bigtime pass rush..which happened but they got gashed in the run game. In the second half they tightened up the run game more and playing inside so Jenkins sack stats went down but his play was good.

blank

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

12 years ago

#33

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer

Let's not mistake having a good year and being valuable to the team are separate. Did Cullen Jenkins have an impact on the 18 sacks Mr Babin got? I have NO question he did.

But why didn't Babin start getting doubled and Jenkins stats rise after it was obvious the beast that Babin is? Why was Babin still getting sacks and Jenkins didn't register one the last 10 or so games of the season?

I like Cullen Jenkins, I knew I'd miss him, and it happened, but I don't think Cullen Jenkins is the god damn cure all Superman some naively make him out to be.

With that said, Eagles, cut Cullen Jenkins. Packers, sign him!

Rios39
Member Topic Starter

12 years ago

#34

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

Because you would rather have to deal with pressure from the outside edge than up the middle. At least if you protect the interior the QB has a spot to throw it. A fast rush from the interior affects the QB all game.

blank

zombieslayer
Registered

12 years ago

#35

Not only that Rios, but when someone from the edge breaks through, you step forward and release.

When someone from right up the middle breaks through, you hold on to the football as you're going down.

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

12 years ago

#36

Originally Posted by: Rios39

That's true unless the QB is mobile. Then your excuse for Cullen Jenkins lack of getting at least one sack the last 10 games is nothing more than toilet paper with brown stuff. 🙂

It does bring up a good point, or rather a question for me. A rush up the middle or pressure on the outside? The pressure from the outside, is that both sides or one? It's easy to step up in the pocket with an outside rush, plus it's easier for a Tackle to block an outside rusher than inside, right? As a Tackle you can slide him out wide... you can't do that with an inside rush. Plus an outside rusher you can chip with a TE and/or RB.

After going back an forth between my two brain cells... I think I'd rather a rush up the middle regardless if it's a mobile QB or not.

porky88
Veteran Member

12 years ago

#37

Sacks don’t necessary dictate the impact a player is having. Clay Matthews is somewhat of an example of that, as he still disrupted and made an impact, despite a low sack total. Nobody else did much, however. I didn’t watch the Eagles play every week, but when I did watch them, I thought Jenkins played well. I don’t think Ted Thompson will pursue him, though. The Packers have won 11, 14, and 15 games in the last three years drafting and developing young players. That is the formula and Jenkins doesn’t fit the bill anymore.

In regards to a rush up the middle or outside, then I suppose it depends on the player. Am I getting consistent pressure up the middle? If so, I'll take that any day because it's closer to the QB. It'll disrupt the pass more and I think most QBs are more dangerous when they can step up in the pocket. Brady and Brees are examples. Rodgers is a rare exception. However, consistent pressure up the middle is very, very rare. Certainly, Jenkins doesn't provide that. Let's not go overboard.

http://www.row12.com/

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

12 years ago

#38

WhA!!!? Stats don't tell the full story!! BLASPHEMY!!! Yes they do! You're absolutely correct, he played a role in the Eagles sacks, but HE himself did not have a good season, at least last 10 or so games. The handful of Eagles games I unfortunately seen, he didn't do anything other than look tough playing patty cake with the OL. Then again, 5.5 sacks for a DT ... I can't hold it against him that those were all within the first half dozen or so games. That's good production out of a DT if you ask me objectivly. I guess I'm just sick of some thinking Cullen Jenkins was the magic answer to the Packers when there's far more bigger issues with the defense. Tackling was an issue last year too.

But yes, Cullen Jenkins would have helped the pass rush ... even if he had just one frickin arm. In. My. Opinion.

Rios39
Member Topic Starter

12 years ago

#39

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

Well in regards to a guy like Brady or Brees or pretty much any QB that's not really mobile, they like to have the clean middle to stand in... if the outside rusher burns the tackle, they can step up set feet and throw. When it's coming up the middle a guy like Brady is rattled.

With a guy like Rodgers if the outside rushers decide to rush really wide he can cut that off and run between the tackle and guard and it's big trouble. So I would say pressure up the middle would be more disruptive to him as well, if anything else, cause it takes his mind off the reads for just a second.

Now in 2010 we were so good cause Raji and Jenkins were bringing the pressure up the gut and when the QB would try to reset, clay would be there. If Clay brought initial pressure they try to avoid and step right into the inside rush.

You don't really need sacks from a guy like Jenkins, but the rush up the middle will cause a big issue for most passing offenses. Forcing quick throws possibly right into where our first zones are standing. You rarely seen deep throws into our secondary last year due to this kind of pass rush and having Nick Collins back there for good measure.

blank

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

12 years ago

#40

Sometimes a threat is as good as a promise in the world of sacks. If you have equal threats on edge or one on the edge and one on the line, it'll be a promise you'll have solid pressure.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

wpr (23m) : wow. That three different things for the kid.

Zero2Cool (2h) : MarShawn Lloyd has appendicitis according to Matt LaFleur.

Zero2Cool (14-Nov) : He probably plays DB.

Zero2Cool (14-Nov) : I don't even know who that Don is

packerfanoutwest (14-Nov) : What position does Lemon play ?

dfosterf (14-Nov) : I read this am that Don Lemon quit x, so there's that

Zero2Cool (13-Nov) : Seems some are flocking to BlueSky and leaving Tweeter. I wonder if BlueSky allows embeded lists

beast (12-Nov) : He's a review guy

Zero2Cool (12-Nov) : Jordy Nelson is still in the NFL.

Zero2Cool (11-Nov) : Ok, will do.

wpr (11-Nov) : Kevin, donate it to a local food pantry or whatever she wants to do with it. Thanks

wpr (11-Nov) : Kevin,

Zero2Cool (11-Nov) : Wayne, got your girl scout order.

dfosterf (11-Nov) : I believe Zero was being sarcastic

dfosterf (11-Nov) : Due to that rookie kicker Jake Bates that Zero said "he didn't want anyway". 58 yarder to tie the game, 52 yarder to win it. In fairness,

Mucky Tundra (11-Nov) : Lions escape with a win

Mucky Tundra (11-Nov) : and now Goff looking better

Mucky Tundra (11-Nov) : Goff with ANOTHER INT

Mucky Tundra (11-Nov) : and now Stroud throwing INTs

Mucky Tundra (11-Nov) : Goff having an ATROCIOUS game

wpr (11-Nov) : Happy birthday Corps. Ever faithful. Thanks dfosterf.

Mucky Tundra (10-Nov) : stiff armed by Baker Mayfield for about 5-7 yards and still managed to get a pass off

Mucky Tundra (10-Nov) : Nick Bosa

wpr (8-Nov) : Jets are Packers (L)East

Zero2Cool (8-Nov) : Jets released K Riley Patterson and signed K Anders Carlson to the practice squad.

wpr (8-Nov) : Thanks guys

Mucky Tundra (7-Nov) : Happy Birthday wpr!

Zero2Cool (7-Nov) : Anders Carlson ... released by 49ers

dfosterf (7-Nov) : Happy Birthday!😊😊😊

wpr (7-Nov) : Thanks Kevin.

Zero2Cool (7-Nov) : Happy Birthday, Wayne! 🎉🎂🥳

beast (7-Nov) : Edge Rushers is the same... it's not the 4-3 vs 3-4 change, it's the Hafley's version of the 4-3... as all 32 teams are actually 4-2

Zero2Cool (6-Nov) : OLB to DE and player requests trade. Yet folks say they are same.

beast (5-Nov) : In other news, the Green Bay Packers have signed Zero2Cool to update their website 😋 jk

beast (5-Nov) : Might just re-sign the kicker we got

beast (5-Nov) : Are there any kickers worth drafting next year?

Zero2Cool (5-Nov) : Preston Smith for Malik Willis

Mucky Tundra (5-Nov) : Getting a 7th rounder from the Stillers

Zero2Cool (5-Nov) : At least we get 7th round pick now!! HELLO NEW KICKER

Mucky Tundra (5-Nov) : Steelers getting a premier lockdown corner!

Zero2Cool (5-Nov) : Packers are trading edge rusher Preston Smith to the Pittsburgh Steelers, per sources.

Mucky Tundra (5-Nov) : Preston Smith traded to the Steelers!!!!

Zero2Cool (5-Nov) : CB Marshon Lattimore to Commanders

Zero2Cool (5-Nov) : Bears are sending RB Khalil Herbert to the Bengals, per sources.

Zero2Cool (5-Nov) : ZaDarius Smith continues his "north" tour.

Zero2Cool (5-Nov) : Let the Chiefs trade a 5th for him

Zero2Cool (5-Nov) : Nearing 30, large contract, nope.

Martha Careful (5-Nov) : any interest in Marshon Lattimore?

Zero2Cool (4-Nov) : What does NFL do if they're over cap?

Mucky Tundra (4-Nov) : They've been able to constantly push it out through extensions, void years etc but they're in the hole by 72 million next year I believe

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS